Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRoxanne Hunt Modified over 9 years ago
2
Applying chaos and complexity theory to language variation analysis Neil Wick, York University
3
Outline New ways of looking at sociolinguistic data Key concepts demonstrated with quantitative linguistic data Non-linearity: small changes in initial conditions can have large effects Complex boundaries between two stable states Attractors: differing degrees of stability
4
The search for patterns is of fundamental importance, but what constitutes a pattern?
7
Chaos Not “randomness” but the precursor to order Sensitive dependence on initial conditions Small changes produce big and non-linear outcomes “the straw that broke the camel’s back” Catastrophe
8
Cellular Automata Invented in the 1940’s More manageable with computers Conway’s Game of Life (1968) –“Mathematical Games” column by Martin Gardner in Scientific American –A cell dies with 3 neighbours –A cell with exactly 3 neighbours is reborn
9
Stochastic algorithm In a dialect simulation, each cell tends to talk like its neighbours The more neighbours that differ from a given cell, the more likely it will adopt that variant
10
123 45 678
11
Thom’s 7 elementary catastrophes Thom’s classification theorem 1965 All the structurally stable ways to change discontinuously with up to 4 control factors 2-dimensional to 6-dimensional
12
4 cuspoids Fold1 control factor Cusp2 control factors Swallowtail3 control factors Butterfly4 control factors
13
The fold
14
The cusp
15
Hysteresis
17
AgeCanadaU.S. 14-196433 20-2929731 30-391662 40-491512 50-591065 60-69375 70-79362 over 8078 Grand Total93580 Age distribution in the Golden Horseshoe data
18
39: Athletic shoesrunn- (vs. sneak-)91%0%91% 43: Shone[a] (vs. [o])85%2%83% 5: Garden knobtap (vs. faucet)89%6%83% 4: Sink knobtap (vs. faucet)84%5%79% 58: Antitee (vs. tie)86%16%70% 8: Vaseause/ays (vs. ace)76%7%69% 57: Semime (vs. my)89%25%64% 62: Zzed (vs. zee)64%5%59% 6: Cloth for facefacecloth (vs. washcloth)66%11%55% 40: wants (to go) outout (vs. to go out)61%8%53% 37: Asphalt has [sh]sh (vs. z)80%27%53% Question #/Desc.Canadian variantCan US Diff. 35: Lever[eaver] (vs. [ever])66%16%50%
32
Hysteresis on the Fold
33
Stability: -Stable -Semi-stable -Unstable
34
4 regions included: 1991-92Golden Horseshoe 1997Ottawa Valley 1994Quebec City 1998-99Montreal
49
Attractors Features tend to go towards stable positions called attractors Example: tongue heights of vowels
50
4 types of behaviour Sink – stable point, attracts nearby objects Source – unstable point, repels nearby objects Saddle – stable in one direction, unstable in the other Limit cycle – forms a closed loop
51
Saddle
52
Limit Cycle Attracting type - Any point starting near the limit cycle will move towards it Repelling type also exists - Nearby points will move away
53
Front rounding in English Proto-Germanicno /y, / Pre-historic OE /y, / emerged through i-umlaut During OE periodmerged with /i, e/ During MEre-emerged Late southern MElost again Modern Englishincreasingly common
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.