1. CMS Experiment CMS Hadron Calorimeter - Arie Bodek
University of Rochester
DoE Review (15 min Talk) - Wednesday, July 23, 2003
I will only talk about Rochester contributions
We==Rochester CDF Plug Upgrade/CMS-HCAL Task D Group)
Brief History - Rochester CDF-Plug Upgrade Group
We invented Megatile-Tile-Fiber Technology for CDF
We built the CDF-Plug HCAL
We tested and calibrated CDF-Plug Upgrade Calorimeter in test beam
We developed very large Megatile technology for CMS-Barrel HCAL
We are building all the HCAL Megatiles. Optical Cables, Optical Decoders/Photodetector Boxes for CMS -HCAL
We installed all the Megatiles into CMS-HCAL at CERN
We have have built an ECAL module for the CERN test beam
Rochester (Slattery-Lobkowicz-Ginther) built the massive test beam table
We have led and are leading test beam efforts and analyses at CERN
We are now in charge of all of US-CMS installation at CERN

2. Overview Outline Past CMS HCAL Activities at U of R
CMS-HCAL Rochester Group
Past CMS HCAL Activities at U of R
Test Beam Motion Table (Slattery/Ginther)
1995 and 1996 HCAL Test Beam at CERN (data taking, analysis, NIM article)
Design of the HCAL Optics System
Construction of Scintillator Megatiles for Hadron Barrel Calorimeter
Rochester L3 Management Responsibilities, Fermilab FY98-F03
Present CMS HCAL Activities
HCAL Installation and Commissioning, CERN FY03-07
TestBeam Activities, 2002, 2003, 2004
Summary

3. Rochester CMS HCAL Group
Physicists ( at Rochester, FNAL, CERN)
Prof. Arie Bodek (25% CMS, 25% Neutrino, 50% CDF) - current effort
Prof. Paul Slattery (mostly Dzero now)
Pawel de Barbaro (Senior RA) - At CERN - 90% CMS (rest CDF)
Howard Budd (Senior RA) - At FNAL - 30% CMS (rest CDF, Neutrino)
George Ginther (Senior RA) - At FNAL - 5% CMS (rest Dzero)
Willis Sakumoto (Senior RA) - At FNAL - 5% CMS (rest CDF)
Y, S. Chung (RA) - at FNAL - 5% CMS (rest CDF)
Technical Staff (we had 6 techs, now down to 4)
Dan Ruggiero (lab engineer) - 100% CMS Project Funds (At FNAL)
Janina Gielata (technician) - 100% CMS Project Funds (At FNAL)->TOB
Agnieszka Sanocka (technician) -100% CMS Projectd Funds (At FNAL)->TOB
Heng Bao Zeng (technician) - 100% CMS Project Funds (AT FNAL)
Tom Haelen (Engineer) - At Rochester
Summer Students
Matthias Imboden (Bern U., 2002-US citizen NSF-REU) - at CERN summer
Pawel Sopicki (Jagellonian U., 2003) - at CERN summer
Administrative Staff
Sue Brightman and Judy Mack

4. Installing Megatiles at CERN
Rochester CDF Plug Group was in charge of CMS HCAL megatile construction at Fermilab and installation at CERN.
Rochester technical staff flew to CERN.
Megatile design made this a rather simple job.

5. Status of HCAL detectors, May 2003HB HE

6. H2 Testbeam - Motion Table built by Rochester Dzero Group
Slattery, Lobkowicz, Ginther and Engineer Tom Haelen HO HB HE

7. CMS Detector

8. US responsibilities in HCAL
Rochester is responsible for all of HB optics. US responsible for all readout electronics
US is also responsible for readout electronics for HE and HO subdetectors
HO 2.2
HB 2.1
HF 2.5
HE 2.3

9. Design of Optical System
Scintillation light is collected by wavelength shifting (WLS) fibers embedded in the tiles
Outside the tile, WLS fibers are spliced to clear fibers
Clear optical fiber cables with mass terminated connectors carry light to the outside of the detector ----> UNIT IS A MEGATILE read by Optical Cables with Connectors
Decoder boxes re-group fibers from layer-wise to tower-wise scheme and house photodetectors
CMS HCAL HB, HE and HO have adopted most of design features of the CDF End Plug Upgrade

10. Techical issues specific to CMS
Calorimeter Performance in 4 Tesla Magnetic field
magnetic field has two-fold effect on the response of the
calorimeter. First it changes light yield of the scintillator
and secondly, it affects the particle shower development.
The second effect depends on the field orientation.
HCAL resolution with and w/o crystal ECAL
presence of highly non-compensating lead tungstate crystal electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) degrades the overall response of the combined ECAL+HCAL calorimeter to hadrons.
Radiation damage of clear and WLS fibers
assuming int. luminosity of 5x10**5 pb-1 for first ten years
of LHC operations, radiation dose will reach 30 kRads for HB (eta=1.1). Radiation dose scales with 1/theta**3, so that
high eta region (eta ~2.8, HE) is affected most (2.4 Mrads).

11. Rochester Management Responsibilities
P. de Barbaro was L3 manager responsible for HCAL Optics
Rochester managed the production of megatiles for Hadron Barrel Calorimeter:
Purchasing of materials (over $2M)
Organization of production (14 technicians, 3 years)
Quality control (light yield, uniformity)
L3 manager responsibilities included supervision of several institutes working on the HCAL Optics
Production of scintillator megatiles and optical cables has been completed on time
All HB scintillators have been installed into the absorber in 2002

12. HCAL Calibration Goal: Calibrate from test beam to 3%.
Time in HCAL electronics.
Monitor performance, including radiation damage.
Tools: 1. Nitrogen laser distributed to each sub-detector. Excites scintillator
2. Laser injects light to photo-detectors.
3. LEDs (fast) inject light to photodetector Programmable pulser.
4. Moving wire radioactive source for long term calibration.
5. Charge injection to ADC’s (QIE).
Specialized calibration modules designed and built to achieve goals.

13. HCAL Test Beam activities
HCAL had a major test beam effort in 1995 and 1996
The focus of these test beams were to resolve some technical issues prior to completing the design of optics
UR played a major role in these test beams:
Lobkowicz/Slattery/Ginther/Haelen have designed and constructed HCAL Motion table, able to carry over 100t of detectors
P. de Barbaro was the corresponding author of NIM article sumarizing these test beam results - analysis done by Rochester

14. Source / Beam Data m- e- RMS 3% RMS 2%
We verified wire source calibration works
(with muons and electrons)
 use to get absolute calibration to 2 – 3 %

15. TB 2002 versus GEANT4 Resolution Linearity
Shape difference: e/h (e.m. & nuclear x-sec), leakage……?
suppressed
zero
The agreement is excellent in all the energy range
Data systematic error analysis in progress
Validate GEANT4 physics models

16. Test Beam in 2003
Present test beam runs focus on verification of electronics:
We are testing two 20deg HB wedges, 20 deg of HE module, and 30deg of HO
40 MHz Charge Integrators (QIE) send data to HCAL Trigger Cards (HTR) via 1.6 GHz link
For each channel, we collect 20 time slices, each time slice is 25ns wide
In addition, we have ECAL module (100 PbWO4 crystals with PMT readout, module designed/built/tested by UR) to study response of the combined ECAL+HCAL, especially in the 53deg crack region.

17. Rochester Responsibilities at CERN
P. de Barbaro has assumed responsibilities of Installation and Commissioning Coordinator for HCAL at CERN
Rochester responsibilities cover installation of scintillators, optical cables, radioactive source tubes, readout electronics, cooling.
Testing of entire chain (scintillator, photodetector, QIE, DAQ) – vertical slice test

18. Rochester CMS HCAL task summary
Rochester lead the design, management and production of the optics system for the HCAL Barrel and corresponding test beam activities,
Production of scintillator megatiles and optical cables has been completed. Several test beam runs completed - First NIM article published
Rochester is now responsible for installation and commissioning of HCAL detector at CERN
Rochester Major Tasks in :
installation of HB, HE and HO scintillators, optical cables and readout electronics at CERN
Test and integration of full HCAL readout and DAQ with other sub-detectors (vertical slice test) at CERN
At Fermilab, continue construction of Optical Decoder Boxes and Electronics.
Provide Root Support and Test Beam Analysis - CMS supplemental request for a postdoc to be at CERN.

19. Back-up transparencies
Additional transparancies - backup for
Short 15 min talk.

20. Optical Design for Calorimeters
Common Technology for HB, HE, HO

21. Optics-Megatiles
Components are the machined scintillator plates, cover plates, fiber assembly (WLS spliced to clear fiber, optical connector) pigtails

22. Cross section view of a megatile
Optics-Megatiles
Cross section view of a megatile

23. HCAL : HB Calorimeter (Barrel)
Sampling calorimeter: brass (passive) & scintillator (active)
Coverage: |h|<1.3
Depth: lint (at h=0) segmentation: f x h =
p resolution: ~ 120 %/ x0.087
17 layers longitudinally, f x h = 4 x 16 towers
Completed & assembled
20o f

24. HCAL : HE Calorimeter (Endcap)
Sampling calorimeter: brass (passive) & scintillator (active)
Coverage: <|h|<3
Depth: lint segmentation: f x h =
p resolution: ~ 120%/ x0.087
19 layers longitudinally
20o
Completed, assembled, HE-1 installed

25. HCAL : HO Calorimeter (Outer)
Total number of lint till the last sampling layer of HB is < 8
HO: 2 scint. layers around first m layer (extend to~11 lint )
Test Beam 2002
~ 5% of a 300 GeV p energy is leaked outside the HB
HO improves p resolution by ~10% at 300 GeV & linearity
Ring 0
Ring 2
Ring 1

26. HPD
Diode Layout
19 x 5.5mm
Hybrid PhotoDiode photon transducer for HB, HE, HO. Fiberoptic front window, conventional photocathode, pixelated diode (19 channels/device). From DEP, Holland. Need ~ 500 total.

27. HPD Fiber-Optic Window Photocathode Ceramic feedthrough
PIN Diode array
Ceramic feedthrough
Fiber-Optic
Window
Photocathode e 4
16 kV
Gain
4000 8

28. HCAL SOURCE CALIBRATION
2 HB wedges showing plastic tubes temporarily attached to accommodate wire source system.
Moving wire radioactive source. Source on tip of ~10 meter wire. Can be sent into each megatile.

29. HCAL – TB2002 beam beam h f h f h f 300 GeV pion 100 GeV electron beam
ADC counts
beam
ADC counts
300 GeV pion h f
Testbeam setup
16 X 8 towers in
Eta - phi
beam
225 GeV muon h f

30. Performance with ECAL
tower
phi
beam
Single Event
in HCAL
s = 12%

31. Fine scan of timing phase. Pulse shape tells timing.

32. Timing Issues (2003)
Clock and Control Module (CCM) controls relative timing of integration of pulses wrt trigger (LHC clock)
Since HB wedges are over 5m long, signal arrival to QIE could vary by up to 15ns (as a function of detector tower eta)
We used laser pulses to adjust timing for various eta towers, then tested timing with pion beam.
This is important, since for triggering purposes we want to use only 2 time slices.
We have also checked relative timing of the two wedges.
More test beam data will be taken in August 2003, test beam also planned for 2004.

33. Measuring relative phase of different towers
Laser calib system designed to mimic beam timing. It works. Laser and pion measurements track.
 Can use laser system to measure relative phases of different towers and then program CCA to compensate.
TIME 
Eta Tower number 

34. Relative Phase after alignment
Use laser to calculate d(t) offset. Program CCAs. Use electron beam to check.
 Can easily synchronize to <2ns using laser system

35. Setting timing of both wedges simultaneously
Use “universal” phase constants to set both wedges.
Conclude :
Rms(w1 or w1) ~ 1.2ns
d(w1-w2) <0.2ns
Wedges are identical. Can use laser to predict overall timing at CMS up to a constant
Wedge 1
Wedge 2
N towers
( Tower phase - mean ) (ns)

36. Interesting Observation
Medium sharing
Low Sharing
Note apparent phase shift of data (average time of pulse) as function of energy deposition in tower.
 Electronics group at FNAL is presently working on solution of this problem.
Medium sharing
Low Sharing
Low Sharing

37. Pileup Studies
Trigger on events with a particle in the subsequent bucket as well.

38. Pileup events, pulse shape study

39. Cradle

40. Absorber Design

41. Modified wedge attachment

42. Wedge side view showing skin on surface
Cutout for Services Z R