1. Tim Cordy, Project Secretariat: traffiQ, Frankfurt AN INTRODUCTION

2. WHY PIMMS?

3. Partner Initiatives for the development of Mobility Management Services PIMMS: 2004-7 8 partners (EU15); bilateral Study Visits PIMMS TRANSFER: 2008-11 deepen and widen 14 “Regions”: 7 Initiation, 7 Progression PIMMS CAPITAL: 2010-12 regionalise 12 regions 7 2/52/5

4. STRUCTURAL FUNDS [2007-13 budget is €347bn = ⅓ EU budget] Objectives are regional development : Convergence Regional Competitiveness Territorial Cooperation INTERREG IVC €321m = 0.1% of Structural Funds budget builds networks to develop good practice and facilitate the exchange and transfer of experience by successful regions. showcases what regions do well, to the benefit of those still investing Priority areas : innovation and the knowledge economy, environment and risk prevention Regional Initiative Projects | Capitalisation Projects WHAT IS INTERREG IVC? A = cross-border (52) B = trans-national (13) C = interregional (3)

5. WHAT IS CAPITALISATION Transfer of “previously identified good practices” into mainstream Structural Funds programmes Must be measurable: Investment Competitiveness  Convergence Target is the Regional Operational Programme: policy impact – getting something done Project output: a Regional Action Plan for each region

6. = Accelerate the transfer of good ideas PIMMS CAPITAL is a Fast Track Network 21 networks: 11 INTERREG IVC 10 URBACT II European Commission provides label and supports implementation (Assessment questions - available on the RfEC website)

7. The PIMMS Transfer Methodology Seeing-is-believing Key decision-makers… not just from project- partners but from all relevant organisations (“Deep Delegations”) Critical Success Factors: what’s the magic ingredient that will allow the transfer Project has a tight-loose structure: many bilateral actions, so partners set their own agenda Own-language working: so that key decision- makers can properly participate

8. The PIMMS CAPITAL Questions How can mobility management be adopted more effectively in regional transport and sustainability policy? How to spread the understanding of mobility management? How to overcome the problem of administrative competencies? How to demonstrate the impact of mobility management?

9. Oct-10 to Dec-10Plan visits, delegationsstakeholders! Jan-11 to Jun-11Export Visits SEE/SELECT Jul-11 to Dec-11Import WorkshopsADAPT Jan-12 to Jun-12Regional Action PlansPLAN Mar-12 to May-12Regional ConferencesDISCUSS Sep-12Final Conference The PIMMS CAPITAL Project Structure ADOPT

10. The PIMMS CAPITAL regions HessenDE BasilicataIT VenetoIT Southern & EasternIE Moravia-SilesiaCZ Central TransdanubiaHU West TransdanubiaHU West MidlandsUK Western GreeceEL StockholmSE( ) CyprusCY SofiaBG HessenExport region CyprusNot export region IECompetitiveness region CZConvergence region in PIMMS TRANSFER

11. The PIMMS CAPITAL Good Practices#1 it’s GOOD practices not best practices; ie what’s available to share between the partners Long-list of 81, iteratively reduced to 14 during bid preparation Being imported a total of 32 times via the project Each import will be personalised (regionalised) to match the importer’s realities

12. The PIMMS CAPITAL Good Practices#2 Frankfurt DEAktionsprogram “effizient mobil”1 Frankfurt DEPromotion of public transport3 Frankfurt DETraffic and Mobility Planning3 Frankfurt DEMobility Management and Mobility Centres3 Moravia-Silesia CZIntegrated Public Transport System2 Limerick IEComputer Aided Central Traffic Monitoring System2 Limerick IEBus Priority Corridors, Cycle lanes, Park & Ride4 Stockholm SEPolicy – Regional Platform on mobility management2 Stockholm SERegional transport, MM, spatial planning3 Treviso ITSafe roads2 Treviso, Venice ITIntegrated fares: technological investments2 Worcestershire UKWorcester Sustainable Travel Demonstration Town3 CENTRO UKIntegrated Transport Strategy5 West Pannon HURegional Operational Programme1

13. EXPORT VISITS: OUTCOMES Hosted events 1 14 Visitor delegations 2 302.1 per event Visitors1585.3 per delegation Key decision-makers8755% of visitors ‘Non-partner’ delegates7044% of visitors Good practice aspects 3 1936.4 per delegation Critical Success Factors1464.9 per delegation 1 4 more in Sep/Oct! 2 6 more delegations 3 “Please identify what aspects of the good practice you consider could be transferred into your Regional Action Plan”

14. KEY DECISION-MAKERS: CHEERS!

15. CONTACTS Lead Partner: Dr Johannes Theissen traffiQ – Frankfurt Public Transport Authority J.Theissen@traffiQ.de +49 69 212 25108 Secretariat: Tim Cordy sec@pimms-capital.eu +44 1273 241688