1. 4 Criteria for Web Evaluation ELEMENTARY (BASIC) This is an easy way to teach students how to evaluate web resources: 1.Content 2.Authority/Reliability 3.Bias/Purpose 4.Usability/Design WEB SITE EVALUATION (Joyce Valenza, 2004)

2. 1. Content  Does the site cover the topic comprehensively? Accurately?  Can you understand what is being said? Is it written above or below your level of understanding?  What is unique about this site? Does it offer something others do not?  Are the links well-chosen? sufficient?  Currency: Can you tell: the date the information was created? the publication date? the date the material was last revised? Are these dates meaningful in terms of the subject matter?  Would you get better information in a book? an encyclopedia?  Would you include this site in your bibliography? 2. Authority/Credibility  Who is responsible for this site? Who sponsors it? Hint: truncate each section of the URL back until you are able to find the sponsor.  What are his/her credentials?  Have the authors of the site cited their own sources? Are the sources documented appropriately?  What is the domain name? Does it end in.com,.gov,.edu,.org,.net? Is it a personal page?  Is that a meaningful clue in evaluating the site? (You can't always judge a web page by its suffix. Some commercial sites provide solid information. Some university sites offer less-than-serious personal pages to graduate students.)  Who else links to the site? (You can perform a link check in AltaVista or Google by entering "link:webaddress" in the search box. Is it linked to by reliable sites? What do other sites say about this one?  Would you include this site in your bibliography? 3. Bias/purpose  Why was this site created? (to persuade, inform, explain, sell, promote, parody, other?)  Is it a personal, commercial, government or organization site?  Is there any bias? Is only one side of the argument presented? Does it appear that any information is purposely omitted? Is there a hidden message? Is it trying to persuade you or change your opinion? Is the bias useful to you in some way?  Can you distinguish facts from opinion?  Would you include this site in your bibliography? 4. Usability/design  Is the site easy to navigate (user-friendly)?  Is there a well-labeled contents area?  Do all the design elements (graphics, art, buttons, etc.) enhance the message of the site? Is there consistency in the basic formats of each page?  Are there any errors in spelling or grammar?  Do the pages appear clean, uncluttered?  Do the links on the site work?  Would you include this site in your bibliography?

3. 1. Select 2 web sites and critically evaluate using the BASIC system. 2. List the title and web site; key your comments in the colored boxes. 3. Submit digitally / include in your portfolio.

4. 1.Content : This website provides tools that you will be able to use and is also very educational when it comes to electronics 2. Authority/Credibility : Created by Jennifer Parker –Moore, Ed.D., Macomb ISD and Cindy Kendall, Ingham ISD 3. Bias/purpose This website was created to inform students on different tools and technology literacy 4. Usability/design : This website is very easy to navigate and understand Web address: http://www.21things4students.net/search-strategies.html Title of Site: 21things4students.net

5. 1.Content : twitter is one of the largest social-networking sites in the world 2. Authority/Credibility : Jack Dorsey (born November 19, 1976) is an American software architect and businessman widely known as the creator of Twitter and as the founder and CEO of Square, a mobile payments company. [2] In 2008, he was named to the MIT Technology Review TR35 as one of the top 35 innovators in the world under the age of 35.software architectbusinessmanTwitter Square [2]MITTechnology ReviewTR35 3. Bias/purpose This website can be informative, persuasive it all depends on what is posted. 4. Usability/design : Twitter is very difficult to understand at first, but then it gets a little easier. Web address: Twitter.com Title of Site: TwitterTwitter.com