Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5."— Presentation transcript:

1 2013-14 Data Review

2 Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5 th to 6 th 62% to 76% UP 14% 2012-13 to 2013-14

3 Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons Math Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 76% to 63% Down 13% 4 th to 5 th 63% to 46% Down 17% 5 th to 6 th 62% to 72% UP 10% 2012-13 to 2013-14

4 Where are we ranked within Clay County?

5 READING: 3 rd : 6 th 4 th : 1 st 5 th : 17 th 6 th : 9 th MATH: 3 rd : 17 th 4 th : 16 th 5 th : 23 rd 6 th : 9 th WRITING: 4 th SCIENCE: 14 th

6 In READING, ROE 3 rd to 4 th Graders moved up 8 positions to 1 st ! In MATH, ROE 3 rd to 4 th Graders moved down 14 positions.

7 In READING, ROE 4 th to 5 th Graders moved down 5 positions. In MATH, ROE 4 th to 5 th Graders moved down 8 positions.

8 In READING, ROE 5 th to 6 th Graders moved up 8 positions. In MATH, ROE 5 th to 6 th Graders moved down 1 position.

9 Learning Gains

10 Roughly 70% of ROE 4 th -6 th graders made learning gains in reading.

11 Roughly 2/3 of ROE 4 th -6 th graders made learning gains in math.

12 Growth of Lower Quartile

13 4 th Grade: 73% evidenced adequate growth. 5 th Grade: 60% evidenced adequate growth. 6 th Grade: 82% evidenced adequate growth.

14 4 th Grade: 46% evidenced adequate growth. 5 th Grade: 65% evidenced adequate growth. 6 th Grade: 72% evidenced adequate growth.

15 Let’s Put It All Together!

16 READING RATES PROFICIENCY 74% GAINS 72% LQ 78%

17 MATH RATES PROFICIENCY 61% GAINS 66% LQ 68%

18 Writing Proficiency Rates 59% (L3.5) 4 th in Clay County!

19 Percentage of students scoring 3.5 and above on FCAT Writes. ROE made a 5% gain while the district and state made declines.

20 Students scoring at Level 4 on the FCAT Writes at ROE decreased by 12 percentage points, while the district remained static and the state declined dramatically.

21 ROE ranked 4 th in the county!

22 Science Proficiency Rate: 59%

23 School Grade 2014 Proficiency %: Reading: 74 W riting: 59 Math: 61 Science : 59 Learning Gains (Weighted %) : Reading: 72 Math: 66 Lowest Quartile % : Reading: 78 Math : 68

24 537 POINTS!

25 8 th in the county!

26 You did an “A”mazing job!!!

27 What do we need to work on?


Download ppt "2013-14 Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google