1. Network Ontology Ramesh Subbaraman Soumya Sen UPENN, TCOM 799

2. Motivation Semantic web – i.e. make web machine UNDERSTANDABLE. Ontology: vocabulary - semantics - relationships - rules

3. Resource Description Framework – RDF - resources - properties - statements

4. Resource Description Framework Schema – RDFS A schema language to model the resources

5. Partial Example

6. Axioms in RDF(S) We have that: so, in RDF we add a resource where symmetric is agreed to mean composition

7. General Axiom

8. Why Network Ontology? Ontology is the shared understanding of what concepts or specifications mean in a particular domain. Presently there isn’t any formal widespread ontology that is being used to represent networks (some proprietary ones exist). A formal ontology will make creating, updating, and simulating networks more efficient.

9. Possible solution: Develop a Network Markup language used to represent all information needed in a network. By creating an XML-based ontology it will provide greater flexibility when dealing with platforms and programming. NML has been designed with a top-down approach. Identification of ‘classes’ and establish relationship between them for different scenarios. Validating relationship with Ontology languages.

10. Today’s topics: Network markup language for Network Planning tool. Framework for modeling wireless networks. Ontology for modeling Sensor Networks. Ontology of representation of sensor network data. Semantic services for sensor-rich Information systems.

11. Network Planning Tools Expert systems like CACIT, Opnet are good but they have some drawbacks. So new expert systems that may be developed can use ontology based on NML for representing the network layout. Kinds of questions asked to the user: -What kind of company? -How many branches? Regional/HQ/global -Workload estimate -description of office dimension

12. Output of NPT: Output: -Well illustrated network layout diagram -satellite/LAN/local loops/wireless/bluetooth -network plans for each office and each floor, access points, routers. -future extension capabilities etc.

13. Idea of using XML ontology: Describing and identifying the commonly used patterns in a network and capturing them in the XML ontology. The representation through relations and tags help in easy interpretation by automated processes.

14. NML DTD A DTD was created to be used in the digital network advisor tool and captures the necessary parameters to fully describe all types of networks. The fields are determined by the user’s answers, underlying assumptions, and calculations.

15. NML DTD

16. XML output

17. Graphical representation of data extracted from XML ontology

18. Proposed ontology for Wireless networks framework:

19. “A framework for modeling sensor networks”- Raja Jurdak, C. Lopes, P.BAldi, OOPSLA,’04. Proposes a framework for sensor network modeling based on general features identified through analysis of existing sensor networks. The framework facilitates the modeling of new sensor networks by characterizing them according to these general features and providing a set of performance goals. Specification of network performance requirements helps in selecting communication protocols. Related Literature: “Ontology driven Adaptive-sensor networks”, S.Avancha, C.Patel, A. Joshi, UMBC.

20. Elements in the framework of sensor networks: Topology- affects network routing, power consumption, battery life. Includes physical (deployment area) and logical organization of the network as well as sensor density. Sensor networks can have distributed or a clustered organization where selected nodes handle forwarding.

21. Elements in the framework of sensor networks (cont..): Network Setting- communication media quality (noise, spreading, attenuation, multi- path fading) and operating environment (security). Sensor Description- resources, memory, battery, participation, processing speed. Data flow- event-driven/demand-driven (SQL type query), processing architecture, system health.

22. Proposed ontology for Sensor Networks:

23. “A Novel Ontology for Sensor Networks Data”- M.Eid, R.Liscano, A. El Saddik, MCRLab Sensor data from a large number of nodes need to be searched efficiently. Classical retrieval techniques had poor performance. Brings improvement in search engine performance by utilizing captured relationships. This ontology is based on the IEEE 1451.4 smart transducers template description language.

24. Components of Ontology: Classes or concepts that may have sub- classes. Properties or relationships that describe various features and properties of the concepts (also called slots). Restrictions on slots that are superimposed on the defined classes and/or properties to define allowed values (domain & range).

25. 1.Identification of the initial taxonomy: Step: List of concepts as described by the identified terms and form the initial class taxonomy.

26. 2. Properties & restrictions: Relationships among classes are usually referred to as properties. Property links an individual from its domain to an individual of its range. Concepts can be refined by superimposing constraints and axioms expression relationships. Universal restriction & Existential restriction.

27. 2. Properties & restrictions: (contd..)

28. 3. Consistency Checking: 2 types of Ontology Tests: - Subsumption test (Testing Class hierarchy) - Consistency check (logical check) Usage of possible Ontology development tools: Protégé. Knowledge representation language for modeling various data types of sensor data is OWL-DL. Validation tool: RacerPro.

29. “Towards Semantic Services for Sensor-rich Information Systems” - J.Liu, F.Zhao, Microsoft Research (publ. IEEE 2005) Need to describe the architecture of a semantic- service-oriented sensor information system platform. The key to enabling scalable sensor is to define an ontology and associated information hierarchy for interpretation of raw data streams. Systems may have mobile or stationary nodes, and products from different vendors must interoperate. Related literature: “Semantic Agent Technologies for tactical sensor networks”, G.Jiang, W.Chung, G.Cybenko

30. To quantify the semantic information contained in sensor data and to capture the relations between various semantic entities such as objects or events in the physical world, we must provide a set of transforms, or semantic services.

31. Application in a garage parking sensor system

32. Application in a garage parking sensor system composed of semantic services

33. Advantages of Ontology designs Sharing common understanding of the structure of information among people or software agents. Enabling reuse of domain knowledge. Making domain assumptions explicit. Separating the domain knowledge from the operational knowledge Analyzing domain knowledge.