Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Teaching Functional Verification Design Automation Conference Sunday, June 9, 2002.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Teaching Functional Verification Design Automation Conference Sunday, June 9, 2002."— Presentation transcript:

1 Teaching Functional Verification Design Automation Conference Sunday, June 9, 2002

2 Workshop Goals Share experiences in teaching functional verification Initiate collaborative efforts to extend the teaching of functional verification Expand Computer Engineering curriculums to include functional verification

3 Agenda Workshop Overview Textbook Overviews Course Organization and Management Lab Exercise Overview Automated Testbench Concepts Formal Verification and Rulebase

4 Why is verification so important to the chip industry? Verification is the single biggest lever to effect the triple constraints: Schedule, Cost, & Quality Fewer revs through the fabrication process means lower costs and faster time-to-market Re-spinning a chip costs: Hundreds of thousands of dollars 6-8 weeks So if you can get it right in fewer "passes", you WIN!!!

5 What Industry Has Found The system and chip industry depends on functional verification There ’ s a science and methodology behind verification Verification has a separate career path from logic and circuit design

6 Course Evolution IBM internal class Initial 2 day class with 1 lab Current 2 week (80 hour) format University Partnerships followed initial course

7 University Participation Penn State, Pittsburgh and North Carolina State have completed full semester courses on functional verification Active class at Ohio State (quarters) There ’ s now a foundation of resources for other university professors to build upon

8

9 Notes: Web address: http://www.cse.psu.edu/~vijay/verify/instructors.html Open to university professors doing verification classwork. Industry access granted for adding to body of knowledge. Tool/Vendor specifics Universities should take advantage of any current vendor agreements they have Materials are “ vendor agnostic ” Simulation engines, Specman, VERA Recognition for all slides must be maintained

10 Contacts Vijay Narayanan, PSU (vijay@cse.psu.edu) (Web page owner)vijay@cse.psu.edu Steve Levitan, Pitt (steve@ee.pitt.edu)steve@ee.pitt.edu John Goss, NCSU (gossman@us.ibm.com)gossman@us.ibm.com Bruce Wile, IBM (bwile@us.ibm.com)bwile@us.ibm.com Matthew Morley, Verisity ’ s University partnerships (matthew@verisity.commatthew@verisity.com Yaron Wolfsthal, IBM ’ s Rulebase (wolfstal@il.ibm.com)wolfstal@il.ibm.com Janick Bergeron, Qualis Corp, “ Writing Testbenches ” textbook, & Verification Guild Newsletter (janick@bergeron.com)janick@bergeron.com Faisal Haque, Cisco, “ Art of Verification ” textbook (fhaque@cisco.com)

11 Blank page for your notes

12


Download ppt "Teaching Functional Verification Design Automation Conference Sunday, June 9, 2002."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google