1. Procedural Safeguards

2. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the right to seek review of any decisions they think inappropriate Congress placed as great an emphasis on school districts’ compliance with the procedural safeguards as it did on their compliance with the substantive aspects of the IDEA

3. Identification of Parents Definition- a parent, guardian, or person acting as a parent of the child, or a surrogate parent who has been appointed following the procedures of the law Does not include the state if the child is a ward of the state Includes persons acting in place of the parent with whom the child lives, as well as persons who are legally responsible for a child’s welfare

4. Identification (cont.) Two routes to parental eligibility: living with the child in a parental role, or having legal responsibility for a child who lives elsewhere Foster parent as a parent if legally responsible for a child’s welfare and the natural parents’ authority to make educational decisions has been relinquished

5. Surrogate Parents IDEA requires that a surrogate parent be appointed if the child’s parent cannot be found, does not have a parent or is a ward of the state Role- safeguard the educational rights of the child Has full parental rights and have no conflicts of interest

6. Notice Requirements Written notice must be provided to parents prior to the school’s proposing to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, educational placement, or provision of a FAPE to the child, or prior to the school’s refusal to make such changes Purpose- provide them with information to protect their rights, allow them to make informed decisions, and allow for full participation in the special education process

7. Notice (cont.) Must be written so that it is understandable to the general public Full explanation of all procedural safeguards Description of action proposed or refused by the school- why action taken, options considered, options rejected Description of evaluation procedures utilized and any other factors relevant to the decision Written in understandable language, understood by parent, and written evidence that these requirements were met

8. Consent Requirements Required prior to initial evaluation and placement in special education, Reevaluation (unless demonstrate unsuccessful attempts)

9. Examining Records Right to inspect educational records relating to their child No unnecessary delay and before any meeting regarding the child’s education Respond to reasonable requests for explanations/interpretation s of records Request copies of records Can have a representative inspect and review Must assume parents have right to inspect Keep records of who accesses the records List types and locations of records Can request records be amended

10. IEE Right to one IEE at public expense Provide parents information about where an IEE may be obtained Right to an IEE at public expense if they disagree with the school’s evaluation School can initiate a hearing to show appropriateness of the evaluation Results of the IEE must be “considered” by the school Hearing officer requests an IEE- school pays

11. Mediation IDEA 97- added voluntary mediation requirements Mediator has no authority to to impose solutions Cannot be used to delay or deny parents’ rights to an impartial due process hearing Allows LEA’s to establish procedures to require parents to meet with a third party who would encourage and explain the benefits to them State bears the cost of mediation Agreements are to be put into writing

12. Due Process Hearing Purpose- allow an impartial third party hear both sides of a dispute, examine the issues, and settle the dispute Parents may request: contest school’s identification, evaluation, educational placement, FAPE or to question the info. in their child’s educational records (EDGAR- ed. dept. general administrative regulations), or resolution of procedural violations adversely affecting a student’s education

13. Due Process Hearing Schools request- parents refuse consent to evaluation or placement 9th Circuit- may be requested by parents even if their child has not been formally accepted into special education

14. Impartial Hearing The officer must have no involvement with the child, the parent, or the school system Districts must maintain a list of persons who may serve as due process hearing officers and provide, upon parental request

15. Role of the Hearing Officer Duties- inform the parties of their rights during the hearing, allow opportunity to present case, conduct hearing in a fair, orderly and impartial manner, and render a decision in accordance with the law A hearing officer may order an IEE, reimbursement of educational expenses, or compensatory education, but may not award attorneys’ fees Has no authority over outside agencies Decision final unless appealed (cannot be held liable- unless known violations)

16. Hearing Rights Can be accompanied by counsel or experts Present evidence and confront, cross examine and compel attendance of witnesses Prohibit information not shared at least 5 days prior to the hearing Obtain a record of the hearing Obtain written findings of fact and decisions Parents can have the child present, require LEA to provide record of hearing and facts and decision Open the hearing to the public

17. Stay Put Provision Unless parents and school agree, IDEA’s stay put provision is in effect Objective- maintain stability and continuity for the student Conduct of the hearing- The formal rules of evidence used in courts do not apply to administrative hearings Relevancy and reliability should be the rules for introducing evidence in the hearing

18. School District Responsibilities Most decisions by due process hearing officers are upheld on review 7 deadly sins- 1) procedural violations, 2) telling parents that a particular service or program is appropriate for their child, but the school district cannot afford it, 3) rigidity, 4) giving in to parental demands when the demands will not provide the child with a FAPE, 5) acting on principle rather than reason, 6) burden of proof is usually on the district, 7) procrastination