1. Format: Conversational Interruptions: Encouraged Conclusions: Speculative Goal: Dialogue and Community 1

2. Assertion: Formerly separate domains of lecture capture technologies and the emerging options for publicly sharing lectures on Web 2.0 consumer platforms are destined for convergence. This development will raise important questions related to policy, control, and governance. 2

3. Outline: Brief Overview of the Lecture Capture Imperative The Current Lecture Capture Publishing and Distribution Model The Proliferation of Institutionally Sponsored Open Lecture Sites Lecture Capture + YouTube / iTunes What’s Next? Professors Go it Alone Some Questions About Instructors Using Lecture Capture Software to Publish On Their Own to Consumer Media Platforms Questions and Discussion 3

4. Brief Overview of the Lecture Capture Imperative 4

5. Lecture Capture: The New Imperative -Students Demand -Faculty Want -Evidence for Learning -Distance Education -Etc. etc. etc. n=162 http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10 752 5

6. Wainhouse Research October Study 2009 http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752 6

7. Wainhouse Research October Study 2009 http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752 7

8. Wainhouse Research October Study 2009 http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752 8

9. Wainhouse Research October Study 2009 http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752 9

10. A Fragmented Lecture Capture Vendor Ecosystem 10

11. 11

12. The Current Lecture Capture Publishing and Distribution Model 12

13. -Proprietary Player -Behind Authentication -High Fidelity -Many View Options -Search -Closed Captioning? 13

14. Advantages of Traditional Model & LMS Publication: -Copyright Protections under TEACH Act -No need to secure permissions for clips, videos, charts etc. - Retain control of intellectual property. 14

15. Lecture Capture and LMS Integration: -Captured Lectures Published Directly to LMS -Lectures Only Available to Class Members -Authentication 15

16. The Proliferation of Institutionally Sponsored Open Lecture Sites 16

17. 17

18. Courses in Consumer the Space: YouTube/EDU -Dedicated Higher Ed Channels - Content loaded by Institutions -Often duplicates content on institution servers 18

19. Courses in Consumer the Space: iTunesU -Authenticated and Open Models - Tight Coupling with Application (iTunes) and Devices (iSlate etc.) -Automatic Syncing 19

20. Institutional Managed Course Content on YouTube: -Cheap publishing / storage platform - Wide distribution and use -Low fidelity / high convenience 20

21. Higher Ed. YouTube/EDU -Not only courses -Not only education - Presentations -Speeches -Marketing 21

22. High Fidelity iTunesU -Huge and growing public academic libraries -High quality experiences - Viable solution for both enrolled (paying students) and lifelong learners. -Superior to on campus solutions? 22

23. Lecture Capture + YouTube / iTunes 23

24. Lecture Capture Platforms Building in Publishing to Consumer Media Destinations 24

25. One Touch Upload to iTunesU and next YouTube 25

26. What’s Next? Professors Go it Alone 26

27. -Instructors create their own channels -Content not institutionally controlled -Professors use lecture capture software to record own classes without technical support 27

28. -Instructors publish on their own – without permission (or even institutional awareness) -Bypass Central IT -Content now lives in the Cloud: who owns, supports, maintains? 28

29. http://chronicle.com/article/YouTube-Professors-Scholars/22847/ 29

30. Some Questions About Instructors Using Lecture Capture Software to Publish On Their Own to Consumer Media Platforms 30

31. Will only lectures by the institution’s most erudite scholars and dynamic professors be shared, or will the published lectures be more inclusive? 31

32. Who decides which lectures are shared? 32

33. If a faculty member wants her lectures posted on iTunes U or YouTube EDU (and the lecture capture software supports this with automatic or one- button uploading), will a policy be necessary to support or thwart these postings? 33

34. Do all published lectures reflect and add value to the brand of institution? 34

35. How does the posting of lectures on iTunes U or YouTube EDU impact the competitive advantage of the institution? 35

36. What will result if the policy of our institution differs from that of peer or competing institutions? 36

37. Questions and Discussion 37