2. I NSTITUTIONALIZING R EPRODUCTIVE L IFE P LANNING S ERVICES IN C ALIFORNIA ’ S T ITLE X- F AMILY P LANNING A GENCIES Maryjane Puffer, BSN, MPA Claudine Offer, MPH, Kathryn Horsley, DrPH, California Family Health Council (CFHC) 3rd National Summit on Preconception Health and Health Care June 13, 2011

3. F ROM INNOVATION TO STANDARD PRACTICE In 2006, California Family Health Council recognized : Importance of preconception and inter-conception health for women’s health and positive birth outcomes Began actions to raise awareness and build partnerships/coalitions across California. 2

4. F ROM INNOVATION TO STANDARD PRACTICE — THANKS TO M ARCH OF D IMES Investigated levels of “readiness” Initiated training for health Conducted pilot integration Developed logic model 3

5. …. TO STANDARD PRACTICE CFHC “institutionalized” reproductive life planning: Required agencies to include preconception and inter- conception health care services in applications for (re)funding Developed clinical guidelines Developed operational performance measures Initiated monitoring of client data: primary contraceptive method, pregnancy and seeking pregnancy 4

6. I NNOVATION S TAGE : 2006-2010 SUPPORTED BY M ARCH OF D IMES RecognitionAwareness Collaboration Training & Pilot Test Readiness Assessment 5

7. A SSESS R EADINESS TO INTEGRATE PCC/ICC IN FP Need for systematic information Goal of survey to assess each agency’s level of: 1. senior staff knowledge of preconception health 2. current delivery of preconception care 3. organizational readiness Methods 100% response rate Findings 6

8. Based on the definition of PCC/ICC provided, how would you rank your own familiarity/knowledge with these concepts: 7

9. Which of the following visits should include PCC/ICC health services? 8

10. Does your agency have a written PCC/ICC protocol? 9

11. At your agency, how often is folic acid information provided to women of reproductive age regardless of intention for pregnancy? 10

12. At your agency, how often are folic acid supplements (alone or in multivitamin) provided to women of reproductive age at low or no cost? 11

13. Indicate if your agency developed partnerships with any of the following organizations in efforts to enhance PCC/ICC services 12

14. W ORKING T OWARD C OMMON U NDERSTANDING Life course approach Reproductive life planning Clinic level pre- and inter- conception care 13

15. I NSTITUTIONAL S TAGE : 2010-2011 $$ Title X priority CFHC funding requirement TA Guidelines Training, webinars QI Performance measures Site evaluation checklist 14

16. S HARING THE ( GOOD ) NEWS * Awareness raising * Publications * Presentations 15

17. C LINICAL G UIDELINES FOR TX A GENCIES Screen for pregnancy intention (short & long term) and for pregnancy risk Ask/discuss reproductive life plan Assist with giving protection Prevention and treatment Assist with managing conditions Pre-disease and chronic conditions Assist with avoiding exposure Substances, medications, environmental toxins 16

18. S TATEMENT OF WORK FOR TX AGENCIES 1. Integrate PCC protocols with existing protocol 2. Incorporate PCC health assessment into the history form 3. Provide client centered comprehensive counseling 4. Provide PCC training for staff 5. Collect client visit record information for submission to centralized data system 17

19. T RAINING OF PROVIDERS Over 550 clinicians and health educators received 1-3 hour orientations On-going training on practical ways to integrate PCC/ICC into most family planning visits Over-arching goal: FP providers become so comfortable with integrated services, that integration is “second nature” to their work. Webinar gave easy access to all agencies in California; now available online 18

20. C LINIC S ITE E VALUATIONS Review charts for documentation: Discussion of client reproductive life plan √ Client statement of pregnancy intent √ Verify use of PCC protocols √ Verify revised history forms √ 19

21. O PERATIONAL P ERFORMANCE M EASURE Agencies provide evidence: PCC protocols integration Revised history form Pregnancy intent captured in client record 20

22. CFHC’ S I NSTITUTIONAL C APACITY FOR M ONITORING SYSTEM - WIDE I NTEGRATION Logic Model guides strategies and actions Baseline measure of agency PCC interest and current practice guides need for TA Contractual agreements in place Technical assistance on-going Systems of accountability and quality improvement launched Statement of Work Performance Measures Monthly and yearly client record data Site evaluations 21

23. W HAT W ORK IS A HEAD ? Reproductive Life Plans piloted and proven, available in different languages, appropriate for women and men, teens and adults Educational materials in multiple languages Revisions to centralized data system and EMRs/EHRs to document client pregnancy intent Promotion of interconception guidelines and patient handouts Full implementation-institutionalization in 85 agencies (340 clinic sites) 22

24. C ONTACT Questions? Kathryn Horsley Director of Monitoring and Evaluation California Family Health Council 510-486-0412 x2318 horsleyk@cfhc.org 23