Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDiana Gregory Modified over 9 years ago
1
csurridge@plos.org PLoS Enlivening Scientific Culture Dr Chris Surridge Managing Editor, PLoS ONE Public Library of Science
2
csurridge@plos.org Public Library of Science Committed to making the World’s scientific and medical literature a public resource
3
csurridge@plos.org Public Library of Science 2003 PLoS Biology 2004 PLoS Medicine 2005 PLoS Computational Biology 2005 PLoS Genetics 2005 PLoS Pathogens 2006 PLoS Clinical Trials 2006 PLoS ONE 2007 PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
4
csurridge@plos.org What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted distribution and re-use Author retains rights to attribution Papers are deposited in a public online archive such as PubMed Central Bethesda Principles, April 2003
5
csurridge@plos.org What Open Access is Not A business model A scheme for Peer Review Free Access
6
csurridge@plos.org What do journals do? Validation Selection Statusing
7
csurridge@plos.org What do journals do? Selection
8
csurridge@plos.org
11
What do journals do? Validation
12
csurridge@plos.org Traditional Peer Review
13
csurridge@plos.org Preprint Server
14
csurridge@plos.org
15
Open Peer Review
16
csurridge@plos.org Open Peer Review
17
csurridge@plos.org Open Access the right to read, copy, distribute and share Inclusive scope a publication for the whole of science High Capacity no length or volume restrictions Peer-reviewed objectively focusing on technical quality Streamlined Production acceptance to publication in as little as 3 weeks Encouraging discussion and debate community comment and annotation http://www.plosone.org/
18
csurridge@plos.org
22
Comments PLoS
23
csurridge@plos.org
27
Comments Referee’s Reports PLoS
28
csurridge@plos.org
29
Comments Referee’s Reports Academic Editors PLoS
30
csurridge@plos.org
32
Comments Referee’s Reports Academic Editors Discussions − Formal PLoS
33
csurridge@plos.org
44
Comments Referee’s Reports Academic Editors Discussions − Formal − Less Formal PLoS
45
csurridge@plos.org
52
Comments Referee’s Reports Academic Editors Discussions − Formal − Less Formal − Journal Clubs PLoS
53
csurridge@plos.org
58
Comments Referee’s Reports Academic Editors Discussions Annotations PLoS
59
csurridge@plos.org
63
Comments Referee’s Reports Academic Editors Discussions Annotations Trackbacks PLoS
64
csurridge@plos.org
67
Rating PLoS
68
csurridge@plos.org
77
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Other Views
78
csurridge@plos.org
81
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases PLoS Hubs Clinical Trials Other Views
82
csurridge@plos.org
88
Library Blogs http://wulibraries.typepad.com/bione ws/2007/10/biology-researc.html
89
csurridge@plos.org
91
Use and Reuse
92
csurridge@plos.org
98
Submissions First submissions: 1 st August 2006 Submissions so far: 2,596 Published papers Launched 16 th December 2006 Published to date: 1,114 Editorial Board 420 individuals ~70% acceptance rate Streamlined Production Average acceptance to publication: 19 days Encouraging discussion and debate ~ 130 post publication comments posted per month > 1 per article on average http://www.plosone.org/
99
csurridge@plos.org Testimonial I have been looking over the PLoS site, what can be attached, how it prints, how it reads on-line, how it cites, how it allows flexible organization and headings. It's so f-king nice, I don't think I will ever leave! Prof. Paul Sereno, 1 November 2007
100
csurridge@plos.org Open Access the right to read, copy, distribute and share Inclusive scope a publication for the whole of science High Capacity no length or volume restrictions Peer-reviewed objectively focusing on technical quality Streamlined Production acceptance to publication in as little as 3 weeks Encouraging discussion and debate community comment and annotation http://www.plosone.org/
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.