Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMavis Fox Modified over 9 years ago
1
Michael Hall David Lasby October 24, 2007 Using a Social Economy Framework for Understanding the Economic Impact of Community Organizations
2
Measuring Community Nonprofit framework typically excludes co- operatives and the inclusion of hospitals and universities is a “grey area” Social Economy: broad definitions include all nonprofits and cooperatives; narrower definitions may focus on those nonprofits that engage in market activity (e.g., PRI 2005 excludes foundations, religious organizations and business associations) How do measures of size and scope vary according to the framework that is employed?
3
Information Sources 2003 National Survey of Nonprofits and Voluntary Organizations (Ontario data) - –Financial data adjusted for inflation 2007 survey of Ontario co-operatives conducted by On Co-op
4
Community Nonprofit Organizations in Canada: A Significant Economic Force Core nonprofit sector (excluding hospitals, universities and colleges) accounts for 2.6% of GDP or $29.1 billion Volunteering contributes additional 1.7% to GDP (1997 estimates) 1.5 million full-time equivalent workers (paid and volunteers) –9.2% of economically active population Broader nonprofit sector including hospitals, colleges and universities adds $80.3 billion
5
Gross Domestic Product: Nonprofit Sector and Selected Industries, 2003
6
The Contributions of Cooperatives to the Social Economy in Ontario Relatively small in number –Approximately 1,300 co-operatives in Ontario vs. 45,000 nonprofits or about 3% of total number of organizations Significant contribution to revenues –$6 billion vs. $51.8 for nonprofits or about 10% of total revenues for social economy Relatively small paid staff contribution –18,000 vs. 959,000 for nonprofits or about 2% of social economy employment Relatively small volunteer contribution –Volunteer complement of 49,000 vs. 7.8 million for nonprofits
7
Relative Contributions to Social Economy
8
Distribution by Organization Type: Nonprofits
9
Distribution by Organization Type: Co-operatives
10
Distribution by Organization Type: Nonprofits and Co-operatives
11
Annual Revenues
12
Distribution by Annual Revenues
13
Distribution of Revenues by Organization Type - Nonprofits
14
Distribution of Revenues by Organization Type – Co-operatives
15
Paid Staff
16
Distribution by Paid Staff Size
17
Distribution by Volunteer Size
18
Volunteers
19
Distribution by Non-board Volunteer Size
20
Distribution of Volunteers by Organization Type – Co-operatives
21
Average Proportion of Total Head Count as Volunteers by Annual Revenues
22
Members
23
Distribution of Members by Organization Type – Co-operatives
24
Conclusions Choice of conceptual framework can substantially affect estimates of size and scope of community organizations in Ontario Inclusion of “core nonprofits” will dramatically increase estimates of revenues, paid staff and volunteers Inclusion of HUC’s substantially increase estimates of revenues and paid staff Inclusion of co-operatives moderately increase estimates of revenues and some estimates of area of activity There are appear to be differences in the resources that cooperatives and nonprofits rely upon for their operations
25
Thank You. ]For more information about Imagine Canada visit: www.imaginecanada.ca To obtain copies of research publications visit: www.nonprofitscan.ca
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.