Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMyles Nash Modified over 9 years ago
1
The development of social adaptation Stress and resilience 17th of January
2
Program Information about the course content, and lectures Information about the seminars and exams Introduction to resilience - What is resilience about? Summary
3
Resilience Definition of resilience What is resilience about? Research on resilience Resilience processes Risks and protective factors
4
What is resilience?
5
Resilience Resilience are defined as: ……positive adaptation in the context of sigificant risk or adversity……… ”Resiliens er prosesser som gjør at utviklingen når et tilfredsstillende resultat, til tross for at barn har hatt erfaringer med situasjoner som innebærer en relativt stor risiko for å utvikle problemer eller avvik” (Rutter 2000)
6
Understanding Resilience Two main components: 1) There must be evidence for positive adaptation, and 2) That there are or have been significant risk to overcome
7
What is positive adaptation? “doing okay” Researchers have provided a variety of criteria’s. - Absence of mental health problems, or - Competence in developmental tasks
8
Resilience Resilience is not a constant phenomenon, a person may be resilient at one time, but this does not mean that this person is invulnerable to other risks later in life. Individuals may be resilient to some environmental hazards but not others; resilience cannot be identified as an individual trait.
9
Research on resilience A new focus: From studying maladaptation to adaptation The rise of a new research focus Longitudinal research design
10
Research on resilience Psychosocia l risks Protective factor Biological risks Behavioural outcome
11
Longitudinal studies example: Werner and Smith (1977; 1982; 1992; 2001) - Kauai study White and colleges (1990) - Dunedin study Tremblay and colleges (1992, 2000) - Montrealstudy The norwegian MoBa study
12
Resilience processes Vulnerability and risk- The compensating modell Risk Psychosocial Adaptation Interventions ( s 42, Resiliens, 2005)
13
Protection model Risk Psychosocial outcome Protective factor (S 43, Resiliens, 2005)
14
Risk and protective factors Individual differences Family characteristics Community Resources
15
Risk factors Research have identified factors or criteria’s to predict higher rates of negative outcomes, than others Risks and stress does not necessary lead to difficulties Risks should be characterized in relation to relevance, type and seriousness.
16
Individual differences - Biological or genetic predispositions - Premature birth - IQ - Gender - Temperament - Personality
17
Family characteristics Mental illness in parents Addiction to alcohol or drugs Socio economic status Maternal education Disharmony/divorce Neglect Family size
18
Divorce
19
Community War Violence within the community Poverty
20
Protective factors - Reduce the effect of the risk factors - Sustain and establish a positive self image.
21
Protective qualities Positive network/organization Individual differences Positive relationships Competences Social support ”Sence of coherence”
22
Community resources Eks: Quality of schools and day care centres Social networks Good social services and health care
23
Individual qualities Eks: Cognitive abilities Positive temperament Self-esteem Competence in example sports Personality Self-regulation skills Positive outlook on life At least one secure attachment Having friends
24
Self-esteem
25
Family characteristics Eks: Higher education Less than 4 siblings Good economy Social support from siblings Parental style Maternal warmth
26
Parent-child relations
27
Multiple Risks, Higer Risks? Multi-risk modell Multiple risk factors increases the possibility for maladaptation
28
E-Risk study Kim-Cohen, Moffitt, Caspi og Taylor, (the E-Risk study)() Investigated outgoing temperament and maternal warmth as protective factors in children living under low SES. Low SES was associated with low IQ and higher antisocial behavior. Resilience against low SES, was found to be partly heritable, Hence protective factors was connected to both environment and protective factors.
29
Factors Resilience involves understanding underlying processes or mechanisms There is a need to understand interaction between individual differences and the environment (nature/nurture) Thus: Resilience is the study of individual differences in response to stress or adversity.
30
Example: Genotype and environment Dunedin study, Caspi, et al 2002. This study examined the association between antisocial behaviour and maltreatment in childhood. Results showed- more severe maltreatment, more engangement in antisocial behaviour. Low activity in the MAOA gene- reported more stronger effect
31
Interaction nature/nurture
32
Summary Resilience is a process in witch a person must be “doing okay” after overcoming severe risks One must look at resilience indirectly examining underlying mechanisms in the environment and the person. Risk and protective factors interact and can intervene or enhance each other.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.