1. Case 8.6 (1-7) A 55-year-old woman who had previously been using a partial removable denture. During a long hospitalization, the denture had not been used and several teeth had over erupted and a forced bite with an inversion had developed in the anterior region. (8-12) Two mini-implants were inserted vertically on the top of the alveolar process distal to the upper canines. A.022 x.026 stainless steel wire was inserted into the bracket-like head of the mini-implants and bend so the two point of force application was produced allowing one to translate the molars mesially combined with intrusion. (13) One mini-implant distal to the right lower premolar was used as anchorage for the distal displacement of the lower teeth on the right side. (13-17) After 11 months, the patient had obtained occlusion of the overerupted teeth and 4 implants could be inserted. (18-22) Provisional crowns on the implant that had osseointegrated were used for final positioning of the right upper canine and the left molar. (23-29) Following the orthodontic treatment with a provisional reconstruction.

2. fig 8.6 (01)

3. fig 8.6 (02)

4. fig 8.6 (03)

5. fig 8.6 (04)

6. fig 8.6 (05)

7. fig 8.6 (06)

8. fig 8.6 (07)

9. fig 8.6 (08)

10. fig 8.6 (09)

11. fig 8.6 (10)

12. fig 8.6 (11)

13. fig 8.6 (12)

14. fig 8.6 (13)

15. fig 8.6 (14)

16. fig 8.6 (15)

17. fig 8.6 (16)

18. fig 8.6 (17)

19. fig 8.6 (18)

20. fig 8.6 (19)

21. fig 8.6 (20)

22. fig 8.6 (21)

23. fig 8.6 (22)

24. fig 8.6 (23)

25. fig 8.6 (24)

26. fig 8.6 (25)

27. fig 8.6 (26)

28. fig 8.6 (27)

29. fig 8.6 (28)

30. fig 8.6 (29)