1. Sustainable energy consumption system in the city of Kherson Skopje 2011 Andrii Barulin Municipal energy service company in the city of Kherson Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

2. INTRODUCTION  increases in energy prices  Bad energy management  lack of analysis tools  insufficient knowledge about energy saving opportunities Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION  Overall objective - Sustainable energy consumption system in the city of Kherson  Immediate objectives - Disign municipal energy plan in October 2011 Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

4. STAKEHOLDERS 1. City Hall of Kherson Municipality – main stakeholder and implementer (owner) 2. Schools, kindergartens, hospitals and clinics etc. 3. Residents multifamily buildings - Home Owners' Associations 4. Heat Supply Companies 5. Municipal Heating Reform Project in Ukraine (MHR) – main funder.

5. Outputs and expected Outcomes Reduction of Energy consumption, payment for energy, local contributions to CO2 emissions; finance tools for energy efficiency projects, Energy efficient behaviour 2.Trained experts of energy management, energy supply companies and the city administration process MEP 1.Created Energy Management office. Appointment of experts of energy managers Defining the needs 3. Implemented of Information System (MEIS) Appointment of a specialist, responsible for implementing and managing MEIS. Installing MEIS. training. Develop plan for energy saving measures Data collection and analysis 4.Designed MEP Pilot energy audits of 15 buildings energy audit heat supply systems Appointment of the team for training. 3 Training workshops. Organisation of cooperation wit h other government agencies

7. Where am I at the moment? The project cycle Planning Implementing/ Monitoring Evaluating Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

9. RISKS Have not  political risk  economic risk  Legislative risk Have  Technical risks  Human factor Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

10. PROJECT MANAGEMENT and ORGANISATION  Project manager is responisible for coordination between all partisipant Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

11. MONITORING and EVALUATING  After each activity  Monthly  quarterly Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

12. Reflections on the programme Expectations – then  new knowladge and skiills –Planing –Managment project –enviromental  View best practice  Relationship  Take experience from another participants Expectations – now  View best practice  improving skills  More Relationship friendship Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

13. Specific things I learned from my colleagues  1.how they deside simular problem  2. what found use  3. cultural in another countries  Etc.. Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

14. Specific things I learned from the period in Sweden  1, approach  2, matrix  3, pasive house  Etc.. Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

15. How I have shared my experience in Sweden with my colleagues at work  1, prasentation  2, access to materials Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

16. Successes and challenges: Changes I have been able to effect in my own work, and within my organization: changed point of view on problems Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

17. What I wish had been different  1,more time with coucher  2,shortly repeat day before Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011

18. Thank you for your attention! Local Environmental Management in Urban Areas - Skopje 2011