1. Developing Security Standards for Smaller Commuter Airports Presented by: Ms Jennifer Morris Australia 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October 10-14 2010

2. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Maximum Take-Off Weight (MTOW) Security measures have previously been tied to aircraft propulsion type – Jets have been treated more strictly than propeller aircraft Why change the current settings for passenger and baggage screening and other security measures?

3. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Security Screening – Major airports

4. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Geographic Challenges

5. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional airports – proximity to capital cities

6. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 MTOW as a trigger for the revision of security settings Amongst all factors of aircraft design, weight or capacity, MTOW is an appropriate trigger for a number of reasons: Consistent across aircraft regardless of method of propulsion. Airframe, fuel load, passenger and baggage weight are all considered. MTOW cannot be altered unless the aircraft is recertified by the manufacturer.

7. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010

8. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Damage and MTOW

9. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Damage and MTOW

10. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Damage and MTOW

11. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 MTOW Creating a robust and transparent primary trigger for security measures –From 1 July 2010, passenger and checked baggage screening for all aircraft greater than 30,000 kg operating RPT services. –From 1 July 2012, passenger and checked baggage screening for all aircraft greater than 20,000 kg operating a prescribed air service.

12. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Q400 Range

13. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Aircraft Size Saab 340 compared to A330

14. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Aircraft Size Q-300

15. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Aircraft Size Q-300 - inside

16. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Aircraft Size Fokker 50

17. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Aircraft Size Fokker 50 - Inside

18. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Aircraft Size Q-400

19. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Regional Aviation – Aircraft Size Q-400 - inside

20. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Barcaldine Airport

21. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Blackall Airport

22. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Milingimbi Airport

23. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Shark Bay Airport

24. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Kalkurung Airport

25. JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Questions?