1. Clam Lake E n g i n e e r i n g Vassar Tree Shear Project

2. Clam Lake E n g i n e e r i n g Clint Cosgrove Clint Cosgrove Matt Lemmons Matt Lemmons Lance Klement Lance Klement Kevin Taylor Kevin Taylor CL Am La Ke

3. Vassar Equipment Family Owned Family Owned Located in Perkins Located in Perkins Vast Array of Products Vast Array of Products

4. Tree Shears Simple Simple Effective Effective Safe Safe

5. Current Design  Vassar currently offers 7, 10, 12, & 16” tree shears  Main focus is on 10” (SS-4)  Main frame is ½” steel plate  No rotation  Blades not flush with the ground

6. History of Customer Service  Rigorous testing at demonstrations  Shears withstand much abuse by customers  Vassar believes in their product, 2/3 cost reimbursement for trade-in upgrades  Very few failures

7. Customer Requirements Frame Rotation  Manual Rotation Flush Cutting  Blades sitting on floor  Customer appeal

8. Customer Requirements New Features Simplified Frame  Less parts  Reshaping frame to align cylinders with blades

9. Customer Requirements Limitations  10 inch tree shear weight under 1100 lbs.  Brush guard remain intact  Withstand 3000 psi hydraulic pressure

10. Engineering Specifications Dimensions  Allow a 10 in tree to fit between blades  Length of implement must be minimized  Height of the frame remains the same

11. Engineering Specifications Forces  shearing forces on the tree from hydraulic rams and impact forces  40,000 lbs. from rams  impact loading of 14,000 lbs.

12. Engineering Specifications Other Considerations  Weight  Angle of rotation  User-friendly?

13. Patent Searches Most patents cover industrial logging implements  Attention is on gripping the tree Others covered boom-mounted shears  These designs were more like “loppers”

14. Patent Searches Design uses oscillatory movement  Cylinder placement and frame shape are much different Contains a C-shaped frame  Patent is for blade angle, also does not sit flush with ground

15. The Competition Dymax Inc.  Only uses one shear blade  May make non-uniform cuts  Mount is not the same Skid Steer Solutions  Only uses one shear blade  Rotational, but with hydraulics  No known patents

16. The Competition Grace Manufacturing  Frame is not curved  Hydraulic cylinders close to 45 o  No rotation  No patents pending

17. Cost Materials Materials Manufacturing Manufacturing In House/ Send Out In House/ Send Out

18. User Friendliness Regular Use Regular Use Maintenance Maintenance

19. Strength Cutting Cutting Impact Impact Fatigue Fatigue

20. Considerations for Rotation Requirements Requirements –Low Rotational Speed –Must Support the Shear Weight –Low Cost –Easily Manufactured

21. Considerations For Rotation Hydraulic/Electric Rotation Hydraulic/Electric Rotation –Rotation with a hydraulic cylinder  Rotation with a rack and pinion  Rotation with an lever arm –Rotation with a hydraulic/electric motor * All require more than one hydraulic circuit Rotation by hand Rotation by hand

22. Possible Designs-Rotation Mechanism Bearings Bearings –Expensive –Require Low Tolerances Drive Rollers Drive Rollers –Low DOM Tubing DOM Tubing –Almost Unlimited Amount of Sizes –Appropriate Wall Thickness –Cost Effective

23. Possible Designs-Frame Four Piece Frame Four Piece Frame –Less Parts –Max Cylinder Force –Manual Rotation

24. Possible Designs-Frame Three Piece Frame Three Piece Frame –Less Parts –Maximum Cylinder Force –Flush Cut

25. Acknowledgements The Vassar Company The Vassar Company Larry Kimmel and Jack Vassar Larry Kimmel and Jack Vassar Dr. Paul Weckler Dr. Paul Weckler H. Clay Buford, P.E. H. Clay Buford, P.E. Wayne Kiner Wayne Kiner