1. 1 Participant Statistical Areas Program for the 2010 Census Michael Ratcliffe Indiana GIS Conference March 13, 2007

2. 2 Participant Statistical Areas Census Tracts Block Groups Census Designated Places Census County Divisions

3. 3 Topics Geography Division reexamined Current relevance and use of these geographies Needs of the data user community Validity of existing thresholds Accommodating ACS data Minimum thresholds for data reporting Population vs. housing unit counts Through: Geography Division research Consultation with Census Bureau stakeholders (ACS team leaders, statisticians, and others) Consultation with non-Census Bureau stakeholders

4. 4 No substantial changes to criteria All PSAP geographies are recognizable in: Concept and purpose Coding and naming conventions Boundary features permitted Things done informally in operational guidelines in the past are made clear and consistent in the criteria

5. 5 Census Tracts Nationally consistent small, statistical geographic units Boundary continuity for data comparability Data reliability

6. 6 Census Tracts: Considerations for the 2010 Census All types of populated tracts meet the same thresholds National standard Reliability of sample data Change minimum population threshold to 1,200 Reliability of sample data Avoid application of disclosure avoidance methodologies

7. 7 Census Tracts: Considerations for the 2010 Census Housing unit counts or population counts to meet thresholds Accommodate ACS data Census 2000Proposed for the 2010 Census Population Housing Unit Optimum4,000 1,600 Minimum1,5001,200480 Maximum8,000 3,200 Thresholds

8. 8 Indiana Census Tracts

9. 9 Census Tracts: Tippecanoe County

10. 10

11. 11 Block Groups (BGs) BGs nest within census tracts Smallest area for ACS sample data tabulation Continuity and comparability from one census to another less of a concern

12. 12 Block Groups: Considerations for the 2010 Census All types of populated BGs meet the same thresholds National standard Reliability of sample data Increase the minimum thresholds Sample data reliability Avoid application of disclosure avoidance methodologies

13. 13 Block Groups: Considerations for the 2010 Census Housing unit counts or population counts to meet thresholds Accommodate ACS data Census 2000Proposed for the 2010 Census Population Housing Unit Optimum1,500--- Minimum6001,200480 Maximum3,000 1,200 Thresholds

14. 14 Tracts and Block Groups: Considerations for the 2010 Census Special land use tracts and block groups Areas of 1 sq. mile or more within an urban area, 10 sq. miles outside No residential population Has an official name Large public parks, large public forests

15. 15 Tract and Block Groups: Considerations for the 2010 Census Special land use areas Source: NPS Central Park, NY 1.3 mi 2 Lava Beds National Monument, CA 73 sq mi 2 Source: NPS

16. 16 Tract and Block Groups: Considerations for the 2010 Census Why define special land use tracts and block groups? Clarify and cohere current practice Enhance thematic mapping of data

17. 17 Tribal tracts and tribal block groups Unique geographic framework separate from the county-based census tracts and block groups that are defined nationwide Equivalent to county-based census tracts and block groups Improve data relevance, availability, and reliability for American Indian tribes Implications: Standard, county-based census tracts defined nationwide (wall-to-wall coverage) Tribal tracts are a completely separate set of geography for data presentation purposes Tract and Block Groups: Considerations for the 2010 Census

18. 18 Census Designated Places Place-level statistics for well-known, settled unincorporated communities; Statistical equivalents of incorporated places; Mix of residential, commercial, and retail areas around a nucleus of relatively high residential population density

19. 19 Census Designated Places: Considerations for the 2010 Census CDPs cannot have zero population and zero housing units Zero population and housing units is contrary to the concept of “place” Not allow CDPs to be defined coextensively with governmentally functioning MCDs in the 12 “strong-MCD” states Reduce redundancy in data presentations

20. 20 Number of CDPs and Incorporated Places in the US, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas: 2000 CDPs Incorporated Places United States5,69819,452 Puerto Rico2250 American Samoa073 Guam320 CNMI160 USVI63

21. 21 Distribution of CDPs and Incorporated Places by Population

22. 22 Indiana Places Incorporated Places: 567 Mean Population: 6,851 Median Population: 1,137 Census Designated Places: 34 Mean Population: 3,363 Median Population: 1,741

23. 23 Indiana CDPs by Population

24. 24 Indiana CDPs

25. 25 Census County Divisions Set of sub-county units that have stable boundaries and recognizable names; Provide comparable set of sub-county geographic areas for longitudinal analysis; Represents one or more communities, trading centers, or major land uses; Can have more CCDs than census tracts in counties with small populations

26. 26 Census County Divisions

27. 27 Census County Divisions: Considerations for the 2010 Census Options: 1.Retain the CCD concept 2.Eliminate the CCD concept and do not replace with another type of sub-county geographic unit

28. 28 Participant Statistical Areas Program Regional, multi-county organizations, (e.g. COGs, MPOs) preferred primary participant To reflect local input and the needs of a wide range of data users Participation open to all interested parties MAF/TIGER Participant Software for electronic submission of boundaries

29. 29 Participant Statistical Areas Program Proposed criteria published in Federal Register in Spring 2007 90 day public review and comment period Final criteria published late 2007 Participants identified late 2007 – early 2008 Materials distributed: Summer 2008 Participants will have 120 days to review and submit boundaries

30. 30 Comments and Suggestions? Geographic Standards and Criteria Branch (GSCB) 301-763-3056 April Avnayim, Vince Osier, & Mike Ratcliffe geo.psap.list@census.gov www.census.gov/geo/www/psap2010/psap2010_main.html