Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Published byFelicity Carter Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc."— Presentation transcript:

1 Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

2 Regional Analysis AoH Phase I intended to make assessments that cover broad regions Many Methods of approaching regional/cluster analysis –Similar aerosol composition –Similar emissions source regions/categories –Similar geography –Similar meteorology

3 Regional Clusters on COHA Website COHA: http://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.htmlhttp://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.html

4 IMPROVE Particulate Monitoring Cluster Criteria All Class I areas within 100 km of a current site Site location lies between highest and lowest elevations of all areas in cluster 156 Class I areas combined into 108 clusters

5 IMPROVE Clusters IMPROVE Sites Class I Areas

6 Look at CMAQ-TSSA results and group sites that are basically influenced by the same sources Look at trajectories of the 20% worst visibility days and group sites with similar patterns Look at monitoring results Possible Expansion of IMPROVE Clusters

7 IMPROVE Sites Class I Areas

8 Monitoring Results July and January, 2002 preliminary results presented at July, 2004 AoH meeting –1 st look at site groupings: July 20% worst modeled extinction days NOx

9 Rocky Mountain National Park CMAQ- TSSA NOx

10 Mount Zirkel WA CMAQ-TSSA NOx

11 White River WA CMAQ-TSSA NOx

12 Trajectory Analysis HYSPLIT calculated back trajectories matching July 2002 days from modeled data Model ParameterValue Trajectory duration72 hours (3 days) Top of model domain14,000 meters Vertical motion optionused model data Receptor height500 meters EDAS meteorological data was used for trajectories Note: CMAQ modeled data uses MM5 meteorological data

13 ROMO HYSPLIT Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

14 MOZI HYSPLIT Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

15 WHRI HYSPLIT Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

16 ROMO, MOZI, and WHRI Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

17 Monitoring Results IMPROVE aerosol samplers –24-hour integrated aerosol sample every 3 days –Analytical results can be characterized by visibility contribution of individual species

18 ROMO MOZI WHRI IMPROVE Aerosol Extinction Data 20% Worst Days 1997 - 2002

19 IMPROVE Sites Class I Areas

20 Weminuche WA CMAQ-TSSA NOx

21 Great Sand Dunes NP CMAQ-TSSA NOx

22 WEMI HYSPLIT Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

23 GRSA HYSPLIT Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

24 WEMI and GRSA Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

25 GRSA WEMI IMPROVE Aerosol Extinction Data 20% Worst Days 1997 - 2002

26 Mesa Verde NP CMAQ-TSSA NOx

27 MEVE HYSPLIT Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

28 WEMI, GRSA, and MEVE Back Trajectories July 1, 2,8,9,10, 23 (2002)

29 MEVE WEMI IMPROVE Aerosol Extinction Data 20% Worst Days 1997 - 2002 GRSA

30 IMPROVE Sites Class I Areas Similar Approach for Tribal CIAs Pine Mountain Mazatzal Sycamore Canyon Supersition Yavapai-Apache

31 DRI residence time maps and trajectory regression analyses Temporal Resolution of Aerosol Data –Total Extinction –Mass –Worst and best days Summary of particulate and visibility data, and attributable emissions What else would be helpful for States and Tribes for Phase I? Other Tools for Attribution Analysis

32 Residence Time Plots Based on 20% Worst and Best Extinction Flat Tops 20% Worst Flat Tops 20% Best Great Sand Dunes 20% Worst COHA: http://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.htmlhttp://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.html Great Sand Dunes 20% Best

33 Residence Time Plots – Flat Tops Based on 20% Worst Species Mass SulfateNitrate Organic CarbonElemental Carbon COHA: http://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.htmlhttp://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.html

34 Residence Time Plots – Great Sand Dunes Based on 20% Worst Species Mass SulfateNitrate Organic CarbonElemental Carbon COHA: http://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.htmlhttp://coha.dri.edu/web/general/trajgallery/trajmapgallery.html

35 19% 0.2% 2.9% 3.1% Contribution to Sulfate at Grand Canyon Based on Transport Regression Modeling COHA: DRI AoH presentation July, 2004

36 20% Worst Extinction (2002) – Northern CO VIEWS: http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspxhttp://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspx

37 20% Worst Extinction (2002) – Southern CO VIEWS: http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspxhttp://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspx

38 Extinction Amm. Sulfate Amm. Nitrate Organic Mass Elemental Carbon Extinction Amm. Sulfate Amm. Nitrate Organic Mass Elemental Carbon VIEWS: http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspxhttp://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspx 20% Worst Extinction/Mass (2002) Rocky MountainMesa Verde

39 Extinction Amm. Sulfate Amm. Nitrate Organic Mass Elemental Carbon Extinction Amm. Sulfate Amm. Nitrate Organic Mass Elemental Carbon VIEWS: http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspxhttp://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/Web/AnnualSummary/ContourMaps.aspx 20% Worst Extinction/Mass (2002) Mount ZirkelMesa Verde

40

41 Avg. Aerosol for ROMO, MOZI and WHRI (ug/m 3 ) Total Emissions for CO,UT and WY (millions tons/year) Average Light Extinction for ROMO, MOZI and WHRI (Mm -1 )

Download ppt "Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc."

Similar presentations

Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.

Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
An Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) Study Marc Pitchford, Ph.D National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

An Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) Study Marc Pitchford, Ph.D National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.

PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Integration of PMF Data into AoH Analyses AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Integration of PMF Data into AoH Analyses AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Phase 2 Attribution “Footprint” Maps show mock ups for how to answer these questions in Phase 2 (data shown is from Phase I) Probably too many colors to.

Phase 2 Attribution “Footprint” Maps show mock ups for how to answer these questions in Phase 2 (data shown is from Phase I) Probably too many colors to.
Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.

Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.

Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Attribution of Haze Report Status Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting December 8, 2004 Tom Moore Marc Pitchford.

Attribution of Haze Report Status Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting December 8, 2004 Tom Moore Marc Pitchford.
Colorado Plateau Sulfate Episode Worst 20% at 5 sites: INGA, BRCA, MEVE, WEMI & SAPE Best 20% at GICL, SACR, CHIR, SIAN, GUMO, TONT, and most California.

Colorado Plateau Sulfate Episode Worst 20% at 5 sites: INGA, BRCA, MEVE, WEMI & SAPE Best 20% at GICL, SACR, CHIR, SIAN, GUMO, TONT, and most California.
Modeling Aerosol Formation and Transport in the Pacific Northwest with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Susan M. O'Neill Fire.

Modeling Aerosol Formation and Transport in the Pacific Northwest with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Susan M. O'Neill Fire.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November 15 - 18, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Case study for September 3, 1997-Eastern US sulfate transport to Colorado Plateau 12 spatially coherent sites in TX, NM, AZ, CO 20% worst haze,with sulfate.

Case study for September 3, 1997-Eastern US sulfate transport to Colorado Plateau 12 spatially coherent sites in TX, NM, AZ, CO 20% worst haze,with sulfate.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,

Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.

Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute Presented at the RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting November 5, 2003.

Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute Presented at the RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting November 5, 2003.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) 2000-2010 IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.

MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
AoH Phase I Report Outline AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

AoH Phase I Report Outline AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.

Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google