2.  Outline the new NCCP  Outline WBC & the NCCP –proposed  What we have done to date  Where are the next steps  Unknowns

4.  Learning Facilitators (LF’s)  Master Learning Facilitators (MLF’s)  Evaluators  Master Evaluators  Certified coaches  Trained coaches

6. ENTER Register for Course Pre-workshop readings and worksheets Course Modules Plan to Develop Wheelchair Basketball Players Making Ethical Decisions Modified Games TRAINED COMPETITON INTRODUCTION COACH

7. PORTFOLIO Submit portfolio to WBC EVALUATION Evaluated by a certified evaluator in a practice Debrief CERTIFIED COMPETITON INTRODUCTION COACH

8.  Certification lasts 5 years only  Maintenance of certification is based upon active coaching and professional development

9. Context5 years4 years3 years Community Sport10 Points8 Points6 Points Competition Introduction20 points16 Points12 Points Competition Intro - Advanced20 Points16 Points12 Points Competition Development30 Points24 Points18 Points Minimum Professional Development Credits Required ActivityPointsLimitations Active Coaching 1 pt / seasonTo a max number of points equal to certification years NCCP Activity5 pt / moduleNo Max or Min Re-Evaluation100% of pointsNo other PD is required Credit / Point Examples

10.  MED is the cornerstone of the New NCCP Competition Stream  It is required by all coaches regardless of previous level in old-NCCP  Trained = MED Module  Certified = MED Module + MED evaluation

11.  Integration of modules into Competition Introduction – why?  Must take MSM through the Provincial Coaching Association for Competition Development – Replacement of Old Level III Theory

12.  There are certain norms within CAC and what other sports are doing  PSO’s are responsible for: LF’s, evaluators, courses  NSO is responsible for: MLF’s, ME’s development  We are able to adjust and tweak with what fits our sport

13.  Complete development of coach materials for Community Coach, Comp Int, Comp Int Advanced, Comp Dev.  Complete development of LF materials for Comp Int, Comp Int Advanced and Comm Coach  Pilot of Competition Introduction x3  Pilot of Competition Introduction – Advanced (1)  Pilot of Competition Development (1)  Very Positive feedback

14.  Collaboration with Canada Basketball  What does it look like?  What will the role of the PSO be?  When will it be ready?  Who should be taking it?

15.  Re-evaluate all developed material  Re-evaluate course set-up  Creation of the NCCP committee  Decisions to be made: o Transfer policies – within NCCP standards o MLFs, LFs, MEs, Es (applications, who, experience, qualifications) o Pathway o Maintenance of certification standards and plan o Professional development opportunities o Rollout plan  when, where, how will coaches in our country get trained and evaluated in our sport? o Risk Management plan – What would we do without Tim? Succession plan for MLF’s & LF’s o Fee Structure o Quality Control of LF’s and Evaluators o Impact Assessment – how effective is the training? o LF : Coach candidate : Athlete Ratios

16.  Context Approval Process (CAP) for each course  Conditional Approval  Final Approval

17.  How many clinics?  How many LF’s, E’s?  Time Frame Surveys & assessments – Nov 2010 Committee creation x 2 – Nov 2010 Development Committee review – Jan 2011 Policy Committee review – Jan 2011 Final Development Committee review – Mar 2011 Final Policy Committee Review – Mar 2011 CAP CC – Apr 2011 CAP IC – May 2011 CAP Comp Dev – June 2011 CAP ICA – July 2011 Full Implementation – Fall 2011

18.  What do my levels give me?  What is necessary to upgrade? Replace?  NCCP Minimum standards combined with WBC standards  Example; CAC, “Coach has Level 1 certification will be granted – at a minimum TRAINED status in either Community Coach or Competition Introduction.  Can ONLY be assigned TRAINED or CERTIFIED in Community Coach or Competition Introduction”  WBC will then have a policy that states; “all Level 1 Certified coaches will receive CERTIFIED status in Community Coach & IN TRAINING status for Competition Introduction”** for example

19.  If a coach has only Theory 1 and / or 2, they receive no status in the New NCCP  Level III transfer has not been finalized yet with CAC  Levels IV & V are targeted for June 2011

20.  How / who manages it all  Numbers, numbers, numbers  How many top-level coaches do we have to fill the role of LF’s?  How many evaluators can we have without doubling up  LF’s and evaluators should be different in different streams  How do we evaluate a coach in Moosonee, ON?  How can we expect a coach in Saint John, NB to take a course when the closest one offered is in Montreal? (not a new problem)  How can we be expected to run courses with 2-3 attendees? (not a new problem)  Ensuring we have the right athletes at that stage for the coach to work with  How do we ensure the program is able to sustain itself financially?  What do we do if we don’t have Tim?

21.  What are the PSO needs?  Community vs. Competition  LF’s, Evaluators, courses  Are you comfortable with a single LF in your province and who that LF is?

22.  Building of the toolkit resource  Funding through your Provincial Coaching Association  Important to note that what we have provided this past 6 months is NOT the norm (cost sharing etc.)  We have one chance to do this and to do it right