1. Smart Management for Small Communities 1

2. 2 Defining successful communities DOS Community Development Programs Project Spotlights Smart Management for Small Communities Holiday Valley, Ellicottville Environmental Finance Center October 7, 2010

3. Smart Management for Small Communities 3 Indentifying and leveraging local assets Maximizing cost efficiencies Collaborating and partnering Capitalizing on opportunities Building and Sustaining Success

4. Multiple Jurisdictions

5. Population Shifts Percent Change in Population April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2006 (Estimated) Source: U.S. Census Bureau

6. Development Trends

7. Infrastructure Funding Deficits “A Gathering Storm” – NYSDEC 2008

8. Department of State Community Development Programs Local Government Efficiency Program - LGE Local Waterfront Revitalization Program - LWRP Brownfield Opportunity Area Program - BOA Appalachian Regional Commission Program – ARC Land Use Technical Assistance and Training (**No more single an separate funding purposes) Smart Management for Small Communities 8

9. 9 Building long-term relationships with local governments Aggressively exploring the integration of state and federal programs Effectively deploying public resources Leveraging regional opportunities, consistent with local needs Expanding Partnerships

10. Local Government Efficiency Program (LGE) 10 (Municipalities Gaining an Advantage) Improving services Reducing local costs Coordinating solutions Focusing resources Smart Management for Small Communities

11. Coordinated Solutions 11 Smart Management for Small Communities Used with permission.

12. LGE Grant Program Eligibility Local Governments (counties, cities, towns, villages, school districts, BOCES, fire districts, special improvement districts, library districts, regional planning boards, water and sewer authorities) Funding Up to $50,000 for planning $200,000 per applicant, up to $1,00,000 for implementation 12 Smart Management for Small Communities

13. Environmental Protection Fund Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Protecting resources Developing local waterfront s Revitalizing hamlets and main streets Improving water quality Enhancing water-based recreation 13 Smart Management for Small Communities Sustainable Community Development

14. 14 Smart Management for Small Communities Sustainable Community Development

15. LWRP Program Eligibility Coastal and inland waterway communities Funding Annually 50/50 matching grants No individual cap Implementation tied to planning 15 Smart Management for Small Communities

16. Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program (BOA) Community-based planning for the revitalization of neighborhoods effected by the presence of brownfields and economic distress 16 Smart Management for Small Communities

17. Brownfield Opportunity Areas 17 Smart Management for Small Communities

18. BOA Program 18 Eligibility Municipalities and community based organizations Funding Continuous applications No individual cap 90/10 matching grants Smart Management for Small Communities

19. Appalachian Regional Commission Increase job opportunities and income Strengthen community capacity Develop and improve infrastructure Reduce isolation 19 Smart Management for Small Communities

20. Appalachian Regional Commission 20 Eligibility Municipalities and non profits Funding Continuous applications 50/50 matching grants Planning and implementation Smart Management for Small Communities

21. Sustainable Infrastructure and Community Development Infrastructure defines a communities capacity to accommodate sustainable growth and development. Includes transportation modes; telecommunications technology; environmental, natural and cultural resources; as well as water and wastewater facilities Planning for sustainable infrastructure often requires a regional approach Collaboration and intermunicipal cooperation can help to improved cost and delivery of services

22. Sustainable Infrastructure and Community Development Village of Rouses Point Village of Champlain Town of Champlain

23. Village of Rouses Point 23 Smart Management for Small Communities Abandoned Barge Canal Dock to the new Montgomery Street Pier

24. Village of Rouses Point 24 Smart Management for Small Communities Shoreline Walkway

25. Village of Rouses Point 25 Smart Management for Small Communities Downtown Lake Access 2006 Plan Vision

26. Village of Rouses Point 26 Smart Management for Small Communities Joint Infrastructure Management

27. Sustainable Infrastructure and Community Development City of Olean Smart Management for Small Communities

28. City of Olean 500 acre study area strategically in northwestern sector of City. Extensive history heavy manufacturing Only opportunity for significant new development within city boundaries Key infrastructure to support redevelopment in place Brownfield Redevelopment Smart Management for Small Communities

29. City of Olean Water and Wastewater Management Smart Management for Small Communities Ensuring appropriate infrastructure for community development Providing opportunity for re-use of land Developing partnerships with state and federal agencies Department of State New York State Envrionmental Facilities Corporation New York State Office of Community Renewal Southern Tier West Regional Planning and Development Board

30. Erie County Consolidation of Water and Wastewater in Erie County

31. Erie County Wastewater Co-Applicants: – Towns of West Seneca, Cheektowaga, Amherst & Clarence, Villages of Sloan, Lancaster & Williamsville, and the Buffalo Sewer Authority. $585,000 in grants to plan for the consolidation of sewer districts

32. Erie County Sewer Districts in 2000

33. Erie County Sewer Districts in 2008

34. Erie County Wastewater Challenges – The size and complexity of the larger municipal systems to be consolidated – The regulatory and political atmosphere – The economic importance

35. Erie County Wastewater Potential Solutions Consolidation of similar services Economies of scale for operation and maintenance services, Increased and more efficient use of existing municipal resources, Effective long-term staffing and labor structures, Strategic and regionally cost-effective capital planning, Joint infrastructure replacement and sustainability, Consolidated management and regulatory compliance, District cost reductions and/or savings, and Long-term rate stability.

36. Erie County Wastewater Outcomes: – Regional consolidation in northeastern Erie County – $4.8M savings after 10 years or 13.7% of total budget vs. status quo – Savings due to lower county pay scale

37. Erie County Water Project Summary – Village of Blasdell and the Erie County Water Authority – Town of Evans and the Erie County Water Authority – Town of Hamburg and the Erie County Water Authority $1.5million in grants to consolidate 47 water districts

38. Erie County Water Challenges: Village of Blasdell Increasing Operating Costs Increased demands of running a utility for its residents. The loss of water was as high as 40% in recent years. Tough to remain in business. Increasing Water Rates Most Village residents are paying double the water rate as ECWA customers. In two of Blasdell's eight water districts, residents are paying a rate 2.5 times higher than ECWA rates.

39. Erie County Water Village of Blasdell Transfer the ownership and operation of the Village’s water system to ECWA $4,330,000 capital improvement project to allow the transfer to the ECWA Awarded $400,000 LGE grant in 2008 Project is moving forward and anticipate transfer to Erie County Water Authority

40. Erie County Town of Evans  Revenues generated through water usage fees do not cover the cost to operate the system  Water system has serious defects and improvement to the system are necessary  25% of the Town's annual water purchase is unaccounted for due to breaks and leaks  Future expansion of waterlines is prohibited until a storage tank has been constructed

41. Erie County Water Town of Evans  Enter into a Lease Managed agreement with ECWA  $12,600,000 improvement project to allow the transfer to the ECWA Fire hydrant replacement Water meter replacement Roadway & waterline improvement Waterline replacement Waterline extension Water storage tank  Awarded $400,000 LGE grant in 2008

42. Erie County Water Town of Evans Project is moving forward, anticipated outcomes include:  $666,000 annual savings for the town  Reduction of current water rate, from $4.95/1000gal to $4.75/1000gal  $2.81/1000gal for water usage  $1.94/1000gal for debt service incurred for the improvements

43. Erie County Water Town of Hamburg  Rising Costs of Construction  Lack of Expertise and Specialized Equipment  Increasing Tax Rates with no real improvement in service  Limited staff in the Town’s Engineering department

44. Erie County Water Town of Hamburg  Enter into a Direct Service Area agreement with ECWA  $5,229,000 improvement project to allow the transfer to the ECWA Fire hydrant replacement Roadway & waterline improvement Waterline replacement Waterline extension  Awarded $400,000 LGE grant in 2008

45. Erie County Water Town of Hamburg Project is moving forward, anticipated outcomes include:  $1,050,000 annual savings for the town  Reduction of proposed tax increase from $200 to an average of $15.35 per household.

46. Erie County Water Authority The Erie County Water Authority provides water under three different service management contracts: Bulk sale Lease Managed Direct Service

47. Tompkins County Water Study Countywide Inter-municipal Sewer & Water Study

48. Tomkins County Water and Wastewater Study Co-Applicants: – Villages of Cayuga Heights, Groton, Lansing, Trumansburg; Towns of Caroline, Danby, Dryden, Enfield, Lansing, Newfield, Ulysses Awarded $82,245.24 - 07-08 Grant Countywide Inter-municipal Feasibility Study

49. Tompkins County Water Study Challenges – Funding availability for infrastructure improvements is limited – Housing availability and supply of affordable housing is restricted – Revitalization of town and village centers is needed/desired – Current information needed to develop cost effective solutions to correct current deficiencies and address the county’s needs

50. Tompkins County Water Study Solution – Determine what areas (countywide) have the future capacity to develop affordable housing and revitalized centers through housing development using information on the capacity of future water/sewer infrastructure

51. Tompkins County Water Study Anticipated Outcomes 8 of the rural centers equipped with water and sewer services and ready for development at 0-5 years, 5 ready for development in 5-10 years, one in 10-15 years, and 8 others in over 15 years; Existing water and sewer systems that have capacity will share that capacity with others in order to achieve the goals of the County’s economic development strategy ~ 6,100 housing units could be built in areas with adequate water and sewer service potential in the next 5 years.

52. Schuyler County/Watkins Glen Countywide infrastructure assessment Revitalization of waterfront and First Street Innovative Wastewater Management Smart Management for Small Communities 52 Jefferson and Lewis County Countywide asset management Potential prioritization of projects

53. 99 Washington Ave, Suite 1010 Albany, NY 12231 (518) 473-6000 (800) 367-8488 http://www.dos.state.ny.us localgov@dos.state.ny.us 53