Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeah Boone Modified over 11 years ago
1
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Stockholm Agreement and SOLAS2009 Lisbon, EMSA, 17 th November 2007 Dr Andrzej Jasionowski, The Ship Stability Research Centre, Universities of Glasgow and Strathclyde Andrew Scott MCA, United Kingdom
2
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Presentation Outline Stockholm Agreement and S2009 COSS suggestion SSRC data Reg 8 implications LLH case Conclusions
3
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Presentation Outline Stockholm Agreement and S2009 COSS suggestion SSRC data Reg 8 implications LLH case Conclusions
4
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Stockholm Agreement SA was designed to prevent RoRo accidents such as Herald of Free Enterprise
5
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Stockholm Agreement H s exceeded 10% of the year
6
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Stockholm Agreement No. Fatalities Herald of Free Enterprise Mar 1987 Rapid Capsize, high list 193 Estonia Sept 1994 Rapid Capsize, high list 852 Samina Express Sept 2000 Collision, Flooding, Sinking 82 El Salam Cob 98 May 2006 Collision, Flooding, Sinking ~1000 These are the cases which never respected the SA standard
7
ALLIANCE DM & SAS SOLAS2009
8
ALLIANCE DM & SAS SOLAS2009
9
ALLIANCE DM & SAS SOLAS2009 Reg 8
10
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Point 1/6 The SOLAS2009 and Stockholm Agreement are DIFFERENT rules! The SOLAS2009 accommodates for RoRo ships vulnerability only coincidently (Russas) No clear technique exists on the bases of which to compare both standards. The risk-based approach seems to be the only alternative.
11
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Presentation Outline Stockholm Agreement and S2009 COSS suggestion SSRC data Reg 8 implications LLH case Conclusions
12
ALLIANCE DM & SAS COSS - 25 July 2006
13
ALLIANCE DM & SAS COSS - 25 July 2006 8 out of 11 cases SOLAS2009 stricter than SA Suggested to dispense with SA
14
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Point 2/6 If it can be concluded that complying with SOLAS2009 is stricter than SA, then why to consider dispensation of SA? It should be met automatically.
15
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Point 3/6 What about the 3 out of 11 cases where SA was found to be stricter than SOLAS2009?
16
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Presentation Outline Stockholm Agreement and S2009 COSS suggestion SSRC data Reg 8 implications LLH case Conclusions
17
ALLIANCE DM & SAS SSRC study
18
ALLIANCE DM & SAS
19
Point 4/6 4 randomly chosen cases demonstrate that Stockholm Agreement is stricter than SOALS2009 Thus 7 out of 15 cases (~50%) considered in this context show that SA is stricter than S09
20
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Presentation Outline Stockholm Agreement and S2009 COSS suggestion SSRC data Reg 8 implications LLH case Conclusions
21
ALLIANCE DM & SAS SOLAS2009
22
ALLIANCE DM & SAS North Europe
23
ALLIANCE DM & SAS South Europe
24
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Whole Europe North and South of Europe divided into 45 regions 37 of these regions, ( 83% ), experience waves in excess of 2m during 10% of the year
25
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Point 5/6 Reg 8 of SOLAS2009 (~SA damage scenario), s>0.9, only requires survival of a 10% sea state of Hs=2.0m But 83% of Europe experiences seas higher than Hs=2.0m Stockholm Agreement by assumption is stricter than the forthcoming SOLAS2009
26
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Presentation Outline Stockholm Agreement and S2009 COSS suggestion SSRC data Reg 8 implications LLH case Conclusions
27
ALLIANCE DM & SAS SOLAS2009
28
ALLIANCE DM & SAS SOLAS2009
29
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Multi free surface (MFS) effect during intermediate stages of flooding
30
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Multi free surface (MFS) effect during intermediate stages of flooding
31
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Point 6/6 Reg 8 allows LLH designs with more likely (70%) extensive damage to LLH than that of SA (45%) LLH flooding seems to be out width single free surface model adopted by S09 in stability assessment Thus it is not clear what are the implications of applying S09 for designing of RoRo ship with LLH concept
32
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Presentation Outline Stockholm Agreement and S2009 COSS suggestion SSRC data Reg 8 implications LLH case Conclusions
33
ALLIANCE DM & SAS Conclusions There are no reasons to dispense with SA Indeed, there are many reasons for retention of SA If in doubt, await outcome of the latest UK- sponsored research on SA and SOLAS2009
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.