Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBlaise McCormick Modified over 9 years ago
1
Administrative Our Teaching Assistant: Janaki Srinivasan janakis@ischool.berkeley.edu Office hours – Thursdays, 1-2pm, room 107 Reading for Thursday: Bauer & Gaskell reading on ‘corpus construction’ can skim pgs 24-29 on language corpora, read the rest carefully
2
INFO 272. Qualitative Research Methods
3
Outline The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research Two versions of steps and sequencing in the research process – (1) linear vs. (2) iterative Discussion of Becker’s ‘The Epistemology of Qualitative Research’
4
Questions to be Answered What are some of the possibilities and problems of mixed methods (qualitative + quantitative) approaches? How is rigor defined in qualitative approaches that use an inductive analytical approach?
5
Bridging Qualitative and Quantitative 1. Quantification also involves qualification 2. Statistical analysis requires interpretation 3. Interpretative approaches can involve systematic procedures (see grounded theory)
6
Bridging Qualitative and Quantitative Methodological pluralism? Time ordering: Qualitative to define concepts Quantitative to refine, test Quantitative to test Qualitative to explain/interpret results The question of rigor
7
The Linear Model 1) theory/model 2) hypothesis 3) operationalization 4) sampling / recruiting 5) data collection 6) data analysis 7) validation [adapted from U. Flick, An intro to qualitative research, chap. 4]
8
The Iterative Model movement back and forth between these phases 1) research topic/questions 2) ‘corpus construction’ 3) data gathering 4) analysis 5) write-up
9
The Iterative Model movement back and forth between these phases 1) research topic/questions 2) ‘corpus construction’ 3) data gathering 4) analysis 5) write-up 4) more analysis Field work
10
A Double Iteration 1) research topic/questions 2) ‘corpus construction’ 3) data gathering 4) analysis 5) write-up 4) more analysis Field work
11
academic setting: contextualized within the major debates in your discipline ‘the boy with the hammer’ (law of instrument) = match between research questions and methods used to answer those questions (does not mean that questions always precede choice of method, nor does it mean that you will not tend to favor certain methods) 1) research topic/questions
12
recruiting people for interviews selecting texts or images Field site selection Why not ‘sampling?’ how to start, where to look, when to stop – meaning saturation but more generally, the search for data richness and the visibility of certain cultural processes 2) ‘corpus construction’
13
interviews (transcripts) participant- observation (field notes) collecting texts/images (from the field) expediency technique - how the communicative process between researcher and researched influences the data produced 3) data gathering
14
Comments in your field notes, emerging themes Established forms: Discourse analysis Rhetorical analysis Content analysis Semiotics Grounded theory 4) Analysis
15
Writing involves committing claims to paper/screen and is therefore an extension of analysis Coping with heterogeneous data (tip: start with the most interesting bit) Closeness to the data 5) Final Report
16
A Double Iteration 1) research topic/questions 2) ‘corpus construction’ 3) data gathering 4) analysis 5) write-up 4) more analysis Field work
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.