1. Entity Relationships for the Bibliographic Universe Jacquie Samples September 7,2010 FRBR

2. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Conceptual model Not a set of rules Uses an entity relationship model, rather than descriptive analysis, without a structural model Abstraction of how we can think about bibliographic records to facilitate relationships between data elements and between data and users Outlined in a 1998 report from the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)

3. FRBR Working for the User “FRBR is a user-centered model, explicitly relating its organization of entities and attributes to the users tasks identified by the 1998 IFLA modification to the Paris Principles (find, identify, select, and obtain). From: Antelman, K. (Oct. 2004). Identifying a Serial Works as a Bibliographic Entity. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(4), 238.

4. FRBR User Tasks Find to locate either a single entity or a set of entities as the result of a search using an attribute or relationship of the entity Identify to confirm that the entity described corresponds to the entity sought, or to distinguish between two or more entities with similar characteristics Select to choose an entity that meets the user's requirements with respect to content, physical format, etc., or to reject an entity as being inappropriate to the user's needs Obtain to acquire an entity through purchase, loan, etc., or to access an entity electronically through an online connection

5. FRBR - Modeling the Bibliographic Universe Utilizes an entity-relationship framework: Entities (a class of things) Relationships (associations among entities) Attributes (characteristics of the entities) Group 1 Entities – Works, Expressions, Manifestations and Items Group 2 Entities – Persons, Corporate Bodies, Families Group 3 Entities – Subjects Childress, Eric, CO-ASIS&T Program, Columbus, OH. 21 July 2005. What’s FRBR?

6. Entity Relationships and FRBR The first stage of information system design uses these models during the requirements analysis to describe information needs or the type of information that is to be stored. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity-relationship_model Artist performs Song Name Title was performed by has

7. is realized through is embodied in is exemplified by Work Expression Manifestation Item one many Physical – Recording of Content Intellectual/Artistic Content Group1 Entities Childress, Eric, CO-ASIS&T Program, Columbus, OH. 21 July 2005. What’s FRBR?

8. The Work in FRBR “A work is an abstract entity; there is no single material object one can point to as the work. We recognize the work through individual realizations or expressions of the work, but the work itself exists only in the commonality of content between and among the various expressions of the work” FRBR p. 17. http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_2008.pdfhttp://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf

9. 9 Vocabulary “Book” –Door prop (item) –“publication” at bookstore any copy (manifestation) Tillet, Barbara. Library of Congress. March 4, 2009. FRBR: Things You Should Know, But Were Afraid To Ask

10. 10 Vocabulary “Book” –Who translated? (expression) –Who wrote? (work) Tillet, Barbara. Library of Congress. March 4, 2009. FRBR: Things You Should Know, But Were Afraid To Ask

11. What is a “book”? Item Manifestation Expression Work I have lost my book. We should order that book. I'd like to read that book in French. That movie is based on my favourite book. Riva, Pat. CLA 2010 Conference, Edmonton, Alberta. 2 June 2010. IFLA’s Conceptual Models and RDA

12. 12 Examples 1. Leatherbound autographed copy in Rare Books Collection? 2. Digitized version of the Oxford University Press text published in 2008? 3. French translation? 4. London Symphony Orchestra 2005 performance? 5. Hamlet? Item Manifestation Expression Work Tillet, Barbara. Library of Congress. March 4, 23009. FRBR: Things You Should Know, But Were Afraid To Ask

13. More Examples of Group 1 Entities Harry Potter Example http://www.frbr.org /eg/hp-goblet- 1.html# http://www.frbr.org /eg/hp-goblet- 1.html# Hitchen, Alison, and Ellen Symons. "Preparing Catalogers for RDA Training." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 47 (2009): 691-707.

14. Relationships http://www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF

15. Group 2 Entities Persons and corporate bodies, responsible for the custodianship of Group 1’s intellectual or artistic endeavor. source: IFLA, http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_current3.htm

16. 16 Group 2 Entities Literary Expression Songs of Innocence and Experience Person Blake, William, 1757-1827 Created by Creates Artistic Expression Songs of Innocence and Experience Created by Creates

17. FRAD Functional Requirements for Authority Data User tasks Find: Find an entity or set of entities corresponding to stated criteria Identify: Identify an entity Clarify (Justify): Document the authority record creator’s reason for choosing the name or form of name on which an access point is based. Contextualize (Understand): Place a person, corporate body, work, etc. in context Example: WorldCat Identities: http://worldcat.org/identities/http://worldcat.org/identities/

18. FRAD Entities/Attributes Attributes of a person Title of person Dates associated with the person (birth/death/period of activity Gender Place of birth Place of death Country Place of residence Affiliation Address Language of person Field of activity Profession / occupation Biography / history Other informational elements associated with the person Attributes of a family Type of family Dates of family Places associated with family Field of activity History of family Attributes of a corporate body Place associated Dates associated Language of the corporate body Address Field of activity History Other information associated with the corporate body

19. Group 3 Entities Subjects of Group 1 or Group 2’s intellectual endeavor, and include: concepts objects events places source: IFLA, http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_current3.htm

20. 20 Group 3 Entities Work Songs of Innocence and Experience Person Blake, William, 1757-1827 Created by Creates Concept/Topic Work Approaches to Teaching Blake Person Gleckner, Robert F. Is Is About Is Subject of Has Subject

21. FRBR/FRAD User tasks in RDA Bibliographic DataAuthority Data Find Identify Select Obtain Find Identify Clarify (Justify) Understand (Contextualize)

22. Why FRBR? Why do you need to understand this? RDA is based on this conceptual model RDA uses these terms and language To make the catalog work best for patrons If you don’t understand this, It will be difficult to navigate the RDA text It will harder to use cataloger’s judgment in context You won’t form 77X fields correctly To use RDA, you have to understand these concepts and terms, because we can’t cover everything in training (unless you want training to last the rest of your lives)

23. 23 Why Do Libraries Need FRBR? Improve the user experience in locating information Guide systems designs for the future Guide rule makers Cut costs for the description and access to resources in our libraries Position information providers to better operate in the Internet environment and beyond Tillet, Barbara. Library of Congress. March 4, 2009. FRBR: Things You Should Know, But Were Afraid To Ask

24. Credits Many of these slides are based on those developed by Erin Stalberg for a course developed for UNC-CH SILS: INLS 721, Organization of Materials II Bibliography Antelman, K. (Oct. 2004). Identifying a Serial Works as a Bibliographic Entity. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(4), 238. Childress, Eric, CO-ASIS&T Program, Columbus, OH. 21 July 2005. What’s FRBR? Riva, Pat. CLA 2010 Conference, Edmonton, Alberta. 2 June 2010. IFLA’s Conceptual Models and RDA Tillet, Barbara. Library of Congress. March 4, 2009. FRBR: Things You Should Know, But Were Afraid To Ask