1. Accountability Reporting The “Scorecard” Presentation to Academic Senate November 1, 2012 Rosaleen Ryan

2. The world in which we live…

3. Student Success Taskforce recommendation 7.3: Scorecard  Progress on intermediate measures of student success  Completion outcomes  To the extent possible, implementation of this recommendation will rely on existing ARCC measures

4. Today’s presentation Current accountability framework vs. The upcoming Scorecard Examples of MPC’s performance

5. Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) In 2004, AB 1417  creation of a performance measurement system for the CCCs  ARCC ARCC has systemwide and collegewide performance indicators

6. Student Progress and Achievement Rate (SPAR) 30 unit achievement rate vs. NEW Student Progress and Achievement Rate (SPAR) NEW 30 unit achievement rate (“momentum” point)

7. The 2012 ARCC Report 7 Table 1.1: Percentage of first-time students who within 6 yrs “progressed” or “achieved.” 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 Student Progress and Achievement Rate 56.1%52.6%54.2%

8. The 2012 ARCC Report 8 Table 1.1a: Percentage of first-time students who earned at least 30 Units in a CCC. 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 2004-2005 to 2009-2010 2005-2006 to 2010-2011 Percentage of Students Who Earned at Least 30 Units 70.1%67.5%66.6%

9. Persistence (Fall to Fall) vs. NEW Persistence (Fall to Spring to Fall – 3 continuous terms)

10. The 2012 ARCC Report 10 Table 1.2: Percentage of first-time students who returned to any CCC the subsequent Fall. Fall 2007 to Fall 2008 Fall 2008 to Fall 2009 Fall 2009 to Fall 2010 Persistence Rate69.9%73.2%74.5%

11. Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) Collegewide performance indicators include: SPAR and 30 unit achievement rate Fall-to-fall persistence Successful CTE course completion rate Basic Skills improvement rate s

12. Statewide metrics Collegewide metrics: SPAR 30 unit achievement rate (“momentum” point) Fall-to-fall persistence (continuous enrollment) CTE completion rate (degree/cert or transfer) Basic Skills progression rates

13. Successful course completion rates for CTE courses vs. NEW CTE completion rate (degree/certificate, transfer, transfer prepared)

14. The 2012 ARCC Report 14 Table 1.3: Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Vocational Courses. 2008-20092009-20102010-2011 Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Vocational Courses 80.0%78.1%77.9%

15. Basic Skills Improvement rate vs. NEW Basic Skills progression rate

16. The 2012 ARCC Report 16 Table 1.5: Improvement Rates for Basic Skills Courses 2006-2007 to 2008- 2009 2007-2008 to 2009- 2010 2008-2009 to 2010- 2011 Basic Skills Improvement Rate 54.8%60.8%61.2%

17. The changing landscape of accountability reporting…  Focus on long-term distal outcomes, rather than short-term proximal outcomes Tracking students over time  No context, no room for unique identity or for flexibility  Data are publicly available  Drilling down in the data  Indicators will be broken out by demographics

18. Questions???