1. Making Sense of the Social World 4 th Edition Chapter 11, Evaluation Research

2. Evaluation Research Evaluation Research is conducted for a distinctive purpose: to investigate social programs. Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

3. Evaluation Terms  Inputs: resources, raw materials, clients, and staff that go into a program  Program process: the complete treatment or service delivered by the program  Outputs: the services delivered or new products produced by the program process  Outcomes: the impact of the program process on the cases processed  Feedback: information about service delivery system outputs, outcomes, or operations that is available to any program inputs  Stakeholders: individuals and groups who have some basis of concern with the program, often setting the research agenda and controlling research findings Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

4. History of Evaluation Research  Began after expansion of federal government during the Great Depression and WWII  Became more important with Great Society programs of 1960s, because program evaluation became a requirement  The New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment was the first large scale experiment to test social policy in action  Decline of evaluation research firms in early 1980s as Great Society programs also declines  Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 required some type of evaluation for all government programs Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

5. Design Alternatives  Black Box or Program Theory:  Is it important how the program gets results? Black box: if program results are of primary importance, how it works may be of secondary importance. Program theory: a descriptive or prescriptive model of how a program operates and produces effects. descriptive program theory specifies impacts that are generated and how this occurs (suggesting a causal mechanism, intervening factors, and context), generally empirically based prescriptive program theory specifies what ought to be done by the program, but has not yet been empirically tested or observed  Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

6. Design Alternatives, cont’d.  Researcher or Stakeholder Orientation: Is the primary evaluator of research a set of social scientific peers or a funding agency?  Stakeholder approaches encourage researchers to be responsive to stakeholders (aka responsive evaluation)  Social science approaches: emphasize the importance of researcher expertise and maintenance of some autonomy in order to develop the most trustworthy, unbiased program evaluation  Integrative approaches: attempt to cover issues of concern to both stakeholders (including participants) and evaluators, balancing stakeholder concern with scientific credibility Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

7. Design Alternatives, cont’d.  Quantitative or Qualitative Methods  Evaluation research that attempts to identify the effects of a social program typically use quantitative methods  Qualitative methods useful for investigating program process, learning how individuals react to treatment, understanding actual operation of programs, understanding more complex social programs  Simple or Complex Outcomes  Most evaluation research attempts to measure multiple outcomes  Unanticipated outcomes can be missed  Single outcomes may miss the process of how a program works Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

8. Foci of Evaluation Research 1. Needs assessment: an attempt to determine if a new program is needed or an old one is still required 2. Evaluability assessment: a determination if a program may be evaluated within available time and resources 3. Process Evaluation (implementation assessment): evaluation research that investigates the process of service delivery Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

9. Foci of Evaluation Research, cont’d. 4. Impact analysis: evaluation research that compares what happened after a program was implemented with what would have happened had there been no program at all 5. Efficiency analysis: cost-benefit and cost- effectiveness evaluation Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

10. Ethical Issues  The direct impact on participants and their families through social programs heightens the attention to human subjects concerns  Needs assessments, evaluability assessments, process analysis, and cost-benefit analysis have few special ethical considerations  When program impact is focus, human subjects problems multiply  Federally mandated IRBs must assess all research for adherence to ethical practice guidelines Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

11. Solving Ethical Issues  To lessen any detrimental program impact:  Minimize number in control group  Use minimum sample size  Test only new parts of the program, not the entire program  Compare treatments that vary in intensity rather than presence and absence  Vary treatments between settings, rather than among individuals in a single setting Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications

12. Obstacles to Evaluation Research  Evaluation research can miss important outcomes or aspects of the program process  Researchers can be subjected to cross- pressures by stakeholders  Answering to stakeholders can compromise scientific design standards  Researchers may be pressured to avoid null findings or find their research findings ignored  Evaluation reports might need to be overly simplified for a lay audience, and thus subject to some distortion Chambliss/Schutt, Making Sense of the Social World 4th edition © 2012 SAGE Publications