1. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 1 of 16 COS Science Team Meeting – STScI Status  STScI Integrated Scheduling System Development – TIME-TAG (primary science mode) and dark exposures > FUV and NUV completed and tested at STScI > Ball testing per FSW availability timeline > OP-01 and good process (COWG) in place – ACCUM and Target Acquisition presently in development > On schedule

2. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 2 of 16 COS Phase Development Plan (Rev 4, 1/17/01) Phase 1 (1/1/00 – 6/30/00) 1.Macro Development 2.Reconfigurations Phase 2 (7/1/00 – 12/31/00) 3.NUV Timetag Mode + Darks 4.FUV Timetag Mode + Darks Phase 3 (1/1/01 – 6/30/01) 5.FUV & NUV Accumulation Science Exposures 6.FUV & NUV Target Acquisition Exposures 7.FUV & NUV Target Peakup Exposures Phase 4 (7/1/01 – 12/31/01) 8.Aperture Alignment Exposures 9.OSM1 Focus Alignment Exposures 10.OSM1 Rotation Alignment Exposures 11.OSM2 Rotation Alignment Exposures 12.FUV & NUV Flat Field Lamp Calibration Exposures Phase 5 (1/1/02 – 6/30/02) 13.FUV & NUV GO Wavelength Calibration Exposures 14.FUV & NUV Automatic Wavelength Calibration Exposures 15.FUV & NUV FP Split Exposures 16.SAA Contours Phase 6 (7/1/02 – 12/31/02) 17.SMGT Preparations 18.SMOV Special Commanding 19.FUV & NUV Anomalous Recovery 20.FUV & NUV Initial Turn-on 21.FUV & NUV BOP Target Screening Phase 7 (1/1/03 – 6/30/03) 22.FUV & NUV Lifetime Adjustments

3. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 3 of 16 COS Science Team Meeting – STScI Status  Pipeline Activities (Ground System “Back-end”) – PDR held 7 December 2000 at STScI > Very successful; excellent input from IDT and STScI systems – OPUS, Hubble Data Archive, calibration ( calcos ) design started – CDRs in April and June – AV-03 and good process (CALWG) in place

4. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 4 of 16 COS Science Team Meeting – STScI Status  COS Thermal Vac Data-Processing Memorandum of Understanding – Defines COS IDT, Ball, and STScI schedule of deliverables – Raw SI data processed through generic conversion by OPUS > Generate FITS files with all proper headers and keyword identifiers, data structures, and formats – No calibration – Catalog data in Hubble Data Archive (HDA) with all necessary searchable keywords and indices – Cost benefit to project; eliminates development of redundant systems – Test images that specify image orientation for all modes prepared by IDT

5. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 5 of 16 COS Team at STScI Tony KeyesGroup lead, Instrument scientist Melissa McGrathInstrument scientist (operations) Ralph BohlinInstrument scientist (calibration) Matt McMasterData Analyst - new team member Marsha AllenSystems engineer (operations; commanding) Dean ZakSystems engineer (operations; commanding) Ron HenrySystems engineer (operations) Tom WheelerEngineer (operations) Phil HodgeScience software – calcos (calibration) John AdamsTRANS developer – (scheduling)

6. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 6 of 16 COS Exposure Type Summary

7. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 7 of 16 COS Data Format  2-d data: FITS files containing imsets consisting of “science, error, and data quality” images  1-d data and TIME-TAG lists: FITS tables containing fluxes, wavelengths, errors, quality, positions, and other related quantities  Separate files for FUV “A” and “B” detector segments – All associated data (e.g., wavecals, FP-SPLIT components, REPEATOBS components, STIMs) use separate files (unlike STIS)

8. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 8 of 16 Tentative Data File Naming Conventions   Product Suffix Type Contents   ---------------------------------------------------------------   Uncalibrated _rawX image Raw counts image   _rtgX table Raw TIME-TAG event list   _asn table Association file   _trl table Trailer file (input)   _jit table   _jif image   _phaX table Pulse-height (FUV ACCUM only)   _rs1X image Stim-pulse 1 (FUV ACCUM only)   _rs2X image Stim-pulse 2 (FUV ACCUM only)   Where X = A, B, or M depending upon segment  

9. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 9 of 16 Data File Naming Conventions (continued)   Product Suffix Type Contents  ---------------------------------------------------------------   Calibrated _ctgX table Calibrated TIME-TAG event list   _fltX image Flat-fielded, corrected counts   _flsX image Summed flat-fielded corrected-counts   _x1d table 1-D extracted spectra   _x1s table Summed (combined) 1-D extracted spectra)   _cs1Y image Corrected stim-pulse 1 (FUV ACCUM only)   _cs2Y image Corrected stim-pulse 2 (FUV ACCUM only)   _trl table Trailer file (output)   _spt image Support file (header)  ---------------------------------------------------------------  Wavecal exposures produce same calibrated files as science, except no flux calibration applied to the _x1* files (TBD). Dark and flat exposures produce no _x1* files. Acquisition exposures produce no calibrated products.   Where X = A, B, or M depending upon segment   Where Y = A, B depending upon segment

10. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 10 of 16 COS Typical File Sizes

11. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 11 of 16 COS Spectroscopic Mode Data Files   TIME-TAG produces each of the following for each FP-SPLIT=NO science and each wavecal exposure: – – a.) raw photon list (_rtg) per detector segment – – b.) corrected photon list (_ctg) per detector segment – – c.) “observed” count-rate detector image [not retained] per detector segment – – d.) corrected effective-count detector image (_flt) per detector segment – – e.) 1-d extracted spectrum (_x1d) combining all detector segments

12. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 12 of 16 COS Spectroscopic Mode Data Files   TIME-TAG FP-SPLIT=YES exposures: each of the 4 individual component science exposures and all wavecals produce: – – a.) raw photon list (_rtg) per detector segment – – b.) corrected photon list (_ctg) per detector segment – – c.) “observed” count-rate detector image [not retained] per detector segment – – d.) corrected effective-count detector image (_flt) per detector segment – – e.) 1-d extracted spectrum (_x1d) combining all detector segments    and the following is also produced  – – f.) 1-d extracted spectrum summation of _x1d for all 4 individual exposures (_x1s) combining all detector segments   TIME-TAG and REPEATOBS combination is not allowed.

13. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 13 of 16 STScI and the COS Science Team: Looking Ahead   What can we do to facilitate your COS science?   COS working proposal instructions – – http://www.stsci.edu/instruments/COS/COWG/cowg.html http://www.stsci.edu/instruments/COS/COWG/cowg.html > > Click on “Ground system requirements from integrated schedule” – – Current version > > http://www.stsci.edu/instruments/COS/COWG/COS_42318.pdf http://www.stsci.edu/instruments/COS/COWG/COS_42318.pdf   Astronomer Proposal Tools – – ETC: > > Requirements : June 2001 > > Testing : fall 2001 > > Public : January 2002

14. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 14 of 16 STScI and the COS Science Team: Looking Ahead   RPS2 and PED   Handbook (review /suggestions?) – – Mini-handbook : May 2002 (cycle 12 CP) – – Instrument Handbook v. 1.0 : May 2003 (cycle 13 CP)   SMGT – – January 2003 > > Test suggestions > > Test data

15. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 15 of 16 STScI and the COS Science Team: Looking Ahead   SMOV and ERO Activities Timeline – – L minus 18 months: set SMOV requirements (GSFC review) [May 2002] – – L minus 15 months: start activity planning – – L minus 10 months: SMOV activity summary (like Phase I) review – – L minus 8 months: high priority SMOV Phase II due (alignments, etc) – – L minus 6 months: moderate priority SMOV and ERO Phase II due – – L minus 2-3 months: GTO phase II due

16. Keyes - 5 Mar 2001 Slide 16 of 16 STScI and the COS Science Team: Looking Ahead   Early Release Observations – – Unique combination of new science and clear public impact > > Demonstrate science capabilities of COS to public audience Traditionally harder for spectrographs Now is the time to start consideration > > Work with STScI OPO ERO Scientist (currently A. Fruchter) and STScI COS instrument team > > Strong NASA HQ and HSTP involvement – – Orbits are in addition to GTO allocation – – e.g., ACS presently developing target list > > Must consider contingencies, SMOV timeline