1. Problem Orientated Partnerships Tackling Local Priorities Gary Salisbury - PC 1623 Sue Roach Community Safety Manager

2. 2000 2002 2005 2006 2007 EXPERIENCEEXPERIENCE Ditch the Dealer Overview MOPPIN – NIM POP

3. The Problem In the beginning - position of weakness Process for the way forward:  Scanning  Analysis  Response  Assessment

4. Scanning

5. –Unsustainable tenancies –Crime attractor/generator –Service provider ‘hotspot’ –Gang culture: FPOG –Deprived community –Overt drug dealing/taking –Under used community centre –No diversionary activities –Blame culture Scanning

6. Analysis Long process - very important Listen 1.Community 2.Stakeholders/Organisations Identify local priorities

7. OffendersVictims Location Analysis Problem Analysis Triangle Heart of the Problem

8. Quantitative analysis

9. Environmental Cleaning Costs £3878.26 for Jan, Feb, March 2004/05

10. Community Consultation Essential  Broad methods  PACT  TASK FORCE  Alternative methods  Option Study  MAPPIN  EVA

11. Qualitative Analysis CGA Option Study –Door to Door Survey –Dedicated Staff –Response of 80% –Areas covered: Length occupancy Involvement in Community Problems on Estate

12. Environmental Visual Audit Qualitative Analysis

13. Conclusion Neighbourhood Policing/Neighbourhood Management  Providing the public with access to local policing  Offering opportunities to influence local priorities  Working with partners to deliver positive interventions  Tackling priorities identified by local people  Providing answers to the public on what has been done

14. Response is 3 strand approach Early Intervention/Prevention Legal enforcement Situational crime prevention/Target hardening

15. Restorative justice GRIP/YIP/PAYP(early intervention) Outreach work (LYS) Princes Trust Reparation Tower Project (drug rehabilitation project) Promote community centre use School involvement Acceptable Behaviour Contracts Streetwise Soccer Residents group – buddies Response Social Crime prevention approach

16. Response 10 ASBOs 12 drug warrants 2 ASB Injunctions 3 Closure Orders Individual Support Orders Parenting Orders High profile arrests Prosecution of persistent offenders 8 Notices of Seeking Possession 1 Demotion of Tenancy 3 Evictions Target offenders Target interventions INTL visits Rat trap Patrol & hotspots Mobile Police Station

17. Response Situational crime prevention approaches Target hardening Estate clean up Improve lighting Improve fencing Funding for CCTV Option appraisal Crummock Rd Influence redesign of Crummock Rd Reduce No’s of play areas Improve existing play areas

18. Assessment What works:  Important to report back to community  Use of Media  Positive activities show sustainability

19. Assessment Quantitative All crime Dwelling burglaries Criminal damage All reports ASB reports Void properties 63 15% 49% 11 20% 91% 41 20% 66% 242 15% 34% 53 20% 29% 35 50% 85% StartTargetActual % Reductions

20. Assessment Quantitative Economic & Social Cost Savings –Savings first three months of 2007: £35,468. –Potential Annual Saving: £141,872 Cost Saving - CGA –Savings first three months 2007: £49,803 –Potential Annual Saving: £199,212

21. Assessment Quantitative Disrupt drug dealing Dissolve FPOG Crummock Road  Gates  Option appraisal  Fire Brigade

22. Assessment Remove fear of crime  Random sampling  Community Activities  Community priority  CCTV

23. Assessment Qualitative Promote sustainable change  Community Centre  Street Wise Soccer  Sure Start  One Voice NM Community involvement Raft CGA Community Development Officer Princes Trust PACT