Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRafe McCarthy Modified over 9 years ago
1
Status of Farmers’ Organizations in Watershed villages of Mali AFRICA RISING SITES – KOUTIALA DISTRICT SIKASSO, 26 to 27 February 2015 By Dr Birhanu ZEMADIM / Cédrick GUEDESSOU Africa RISING annual Workshop
2
Work Plan 1- Target villages 2- Objective of the study & methodology 3- Main finding 4- Conclusion and perspective 5- Forwarding message
3
Target villages
4
Objective of the study and methodology Objective To produce necessary information about the presence of FO and feasibility of watershed approach focused on land and water management practices Methodology ● Meetings with the administration of each village and the presidents of each FO ● Field visits ● Investigations
5
Number of existing FO : 29
6
Years of existence ● The oldest FO is 50 years old (DOSOROLA in Zanzoni village) ● The youngest FO is 1 year old (BENKAN in Sirakele village)
7
Members of FO Number of Members ● The largest FO had 450 members (N’Golonianasso) ● The smallest FO had 14 members (Sirakele / Nampossela) Ethnicity of the members ● For 55.2% of the FO members are exclusively from Minianka ethnicity. In other cases they are associated with Fulani, Bambara, Senufo, Sarakole, Touareg and Bobo.
8
Nature of the FO
9
Inclusion of members of others village
10
FOs’ character
11
Reasons of establishment ● 41%: to be stronger while being together ● 24%: to work to develop the agriculture ● 24%: to develop the village
12
Main objective ● To make agriculture, gardening and stock farming together ● To increase members’ interest
13
Specific roles of the FO ● To promote collective work for sustainable agricultural development ● Knowledge sharing between members ● Mutual support ● To facilitate access of members to the CMDT and to the banks.
14
Support to members ● 41%: FO provide financial assistance and nature to their members in case of temporary difficulties ● 38%: FO provide fertilizer, seeds and pesticides to their members ● 17%: FO provide no help to their members
15
FO’s management: Leaders’ Team ● All of the FO are managed by a leaders' team headed by a president ● 79% of FO presidents were men (37 ÷ 62 years old) ● 21% of FO presidents were women (50 ÷ 60 years old)
16
FO’s management: Conflict resolution
17
Select Mode Leaders’ team ● 62%: Several criterion ● 38%: By vote Membership ● 35%: Free membership selection based on trust ● 31%: Consensus ● 21%: By vote ● 13%: Farmer, seller or cotton producers only
18
Rules for members ● Regular payment of financial contributions ● No delay or absence tolerated during a meeting and a working group ● Respect of other members
19
Socio economic ● 97% of FO Impact on the flow of information ● 72% impact on family ● 76% impact on nutrition ● 62% impact on crops production ● 42% impact on market ● 24%impact on water
20
Crops grown information ● Main crops: cotton, maize, sorghum, millet and groundnuts ● First priority crop for women’s association: Rice ● First priority crop for men’s association and mixed association : Cotton ● Cash crop: Cotton
21
Agricultural input information ● Seeds: Cotton seeds come mainly from the CMDT. The other seeds come from NGOs, Partner Institutions, local market or family selection ● Fertilizers and pesticides: Fertilizers and pesticides are mainly used for cash crop and come mostly from CMDT
22
Production information ● As reported by farmers, the production for cotton is about 1.1 T/ha, 4 T/ha for maize and 6 T/ha for millet ● For 43% of the FO, the agricultural production is increasing ● For 57% of the FO, the agricultural production is decreasing
23
Crops sold information The cash crop is cotton. It is sold almost immediately after harvest and priority to the CMDT. The others crops are family food warranty and are sold only in the excess spread or in cases of extreme emergency
24
Land and water management practices ● Land management practices: Use of grass and wood to fence the field (known since 20 years) / Stone bund in high erosion zones (known since 40 years) ● Water management practices: Use of wells (14%) / Use of dam (4%) / No water management practices (83%) ● CBT practices: CBT technology is not known in the region. So FO need to be informed about it and be accompanied
25
Water use information Agricultural production is mostly rainfed Few villages experience shallow well for irrigation (Zanzoni, one of the FO added the use of a well for supplemental irrigation for dry season crops)
26
Major constraints
27
Main partners
28
Conclusion and perspective Conclusion ● Limited knowledge in conserving rainwater and reducing soil erosion ● CBT technology is the preferred one but not widely known Perspective An awareness of different social strata on the importance of land and water management practices and show them the technologies to improve land and water management
29
Forwarding message 1- Objective: Study of the feasibility of watershed approaches focused on land and water management practices 2- Conclusion: Local communities require strong support to conserve rainwater and reduce soil erosion 3- Perspective: Show the importance of land and water management practices and the technologies available for wider dissemination
30
Thank you for your attention
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.