Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBethanie Stokes Modified over 9 years ago
1
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Research Question How are parents’ life course trajectories and well-being affected by having a child with a disability?
2
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Possible Sources of Bias More favorable well-being and adaptation Middle class and well-educated Under-representation of persons of color Well-connected with the service system
3
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Why is this a Problem? Unknown limitations on generalizability Underestimation or overestimation of service needs
4
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study Survey of 10,317 high school graduates in 1957 (born in 1939) Time of data collection 1957 (age 18) 1975 (age 36) 1992 (age 53) Survey of a randomly selected sibling (n=5363)
5
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n New Use of the WLS Some WLS parents have had a child with a disability. Would findings of past research generalize to an unselected sample? Advantages of WLS: prospective methods, assessment prior to parenthood, and continuing to mid-life.
6
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Sample 165 parents of a child with DD 53 parents of a child with MH problems 218 comparison parents
7
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Research Questions 1.Do the three groups differ in family background? 2.Do parents of children with disabilities diverge from the comparison group in patterns of life course attainment? 3.Do parents of children with disabilities diverge from the comparison group in well-being?
8
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Comparison of Groups in 1957 Similar in family background Parental education, occupation, income Family size Population of town in residence Similar in IQ score Different in family religion (p=.096) Found women who later had a child with a disability were more likely than young men in these groups to be from Catholic families; no difference in comparison groups Religion controlled in subsequent analyses
9
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Similarities in Life Course Attainment No differences among the three groups in post-secondary educational attainment No differences among the three groups in family income No differences among the three groups in marital status
10
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 1. Number of Weeks Employed in Previous Year (1975)
11
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 2. Percent of Respondents Employed (1992)
12
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 3. Years in Present Job (1992)
13
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 4. Family Matters Reduce Time for Job (1992)
14
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 5. Expect to Work in Ten Years (1992)
15
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Differences in Occupational Attainment Parents of children with MH problems: elevations in maternal employment less stability in father’s employment greater expectation that they will be employed in 10 years. Parents of children with DD: Reduced maternal employment More family-work role strain
16
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 6. Target Child Lives at Home (1992)
17
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 7. Number of Visits with Friends in Past 4 Weeks (1975)
18
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 8. Number of Visits with Friends in Past 4 Weeks (1992)
19
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 9. Number of Physical Symptoms (1992)
20
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 10. Depressive Symptoms (1992)
21
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Figure 11. Alcohol Symptoms (1992)
22
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Summary Support for prior pattern of findings New insights Similar at age 18 Divergence thereafter
23
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Public Health Risks of Parenting a Child with a Disability Elevations and health problems, depression and alcohol use (MH) Alterations in lifestyle – by mothers
24
w a i s m a n c e n t e r, u n i v e r s i t y o f w i s c o n s i n – m a d i s o n Next Steps New round of WLS data collection in 2002
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.