Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGervase Harrison Modified over 9 years ago
1
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Interpretation of simulated exchange across the Iceland Faroe Ridge in a global model Steffen M. Olsen with contributions from Bogi Hansen, Svein Østerhus, Detlef Quadfasel, Héðinn Valdimarsson Challenge Simulation of ocean exchanges across a shallow ridge 3.5±0.5 Sv. Contributes about half the ocean heat transport to the Arctic
2
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Model limitations In the coarse resolution global model analyzed simulated transport across the IFR consists solely of Atlantic Inflow -Used here are hindcast results based on the NEMO/ORCA1 code, the ocean-sea ice component of the EC-Earth coupled climate model (CMIP5) Estimates of the IF overflow are uncertain but the total flow is likely not higher than 1 Sv
3
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Model-data discrepancy during the 2003-event Contribution from the two components are negatively correlated: (r=-0.71) Inflow on the Faroe side of the Ridge correlates reasonably with observed total transport (r=0.55) but with about half the variability.
4
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Hypothesis Model IF-transport which per definition is the net transport compares with the true net volume transport: Atlantic inflow - dense overflow Requires model verification of the barotropic forcing To explain apparent discrepancy between observed and simulated inflow requires the (unresolved) IF-overflow to be weak during the event. Need for observational support
5
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice The anomalous conditions during the 2003-event A strong increase in the meridional (right) wind stress characterized the JFM conditions during the 2003- event. Correlations with the local meridional (blue) and zonal (red) wind forcing are weak both for the model inflow in on the Iceland (top) and Faroe side (bottom).
6
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Observed IF-inflow and sea-level The IF inflow is controlled by the sea-level drop across the Ridge described by h u -h d (Hansen et al. 2010) During the 2003 event this forcing was reduced.
7
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice The anomalous sea- level during the 2003- event The regional pattern of sea-level compares with observed changes. The model do reproduce the drop in h u -h d during the 2003 event. Only the inflow on the Faroe side (bottom) responds to the sea-level drop but with a reduced strength (55%).
8
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Changes in the depth of the 27.8 interface during the 2003-event North east of the IF-ridge the interface deepens by up to 50m sufficient to explain a large decrease in overflow (simple two- layer models). This appears to be a baroclinic adjustment to the changes in sea- level whereby also the intermediate water circulation decreases (seen in both model and observations) Observations (not shown) indicate that this response is delayed by up to a couple of months.
9
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Results from a 2-year ADCP deployment in the Western Valley The time-series of reconstructed interface height is produced using a regression model exploiting the linkage to sea-level and fitted to synoptic hydrographic data at section K (red dot)
10
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Reconstructed interface height variations Evidence of a reduced interface height (above sill level) during the 2003-event as in the model simulation. Consistent with a reduced overflow over the ridge.
11
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Conclusions It is emphasized that model IF-inflow represents the net flux with realistic forcing. The IF-overflow is linked to variations in IF-inflow through coupled sea-level and interface height changes. The interface deepened sufficiently during the 2003-event to explain a significant decline in overflow. This linkage may partly explain the striking discrepancy between model results and observed variations in IF-inflow. To completely account for the discrepancy the average IF-overflow during the whole of 2003 should be ~1.5 Sv below the average. Such a high overall average is however not supported by the literature. Biased ocean heat transport to the arctic across the Iceland Faroe Ridge in global models?
12
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7 2007-2013), under grant agreement n.308299 NACLIM www.naclim.euwww.naclim.eu
13
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Supplementary slides
14
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Supplementary slides
15
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice InflowOverflow/Outflow Østerhus et al., in prep. Supplementary slides
16
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice Overflow/OutflowInflow Seasonality links surface inflow the the east with light surface outflow to the west- the eusturine circulation loop. Weak seasonality in the overflows (consistent with critical flow) Observed DS overflow distribution is inconsistent with model result – suggests a high level of noise. Østerhus et al., in prep. Supplementary slides
17
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK (smo@dmi.dk) Center for Ocean and Ice The net would account for the sum of the light EGC outflow and the denser IFR and WWTR overflows. Supplementary slides
18
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7 2007-2013), under grant agreement n.308299 NACLIM www.naclim.eu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.