Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPriscilla Norton Modified over 9 years ago
1
OSHA Update -- June 2011 Richard E. Fairfax, CIH Deputy Assistant Secretary Occupational Safety and Health Administration
2
FY 2007 – FY 2011 Inspections Conducted
3
FY 2007 – FY 2011 % Programmed vs. % Unprogrammed
4
FY 2007 – FY 2011 % Complaint Inspections
5
FY 2007 – FY 2011 % Inspections In-Compliance
6
FY 2007 – FY 2011 Total Violations Issued
7
FY 2007 – FY 2011 Total Violations Issued as Serious
8
FY 2007 – FY 2011 % Total Violations Issued as SWR
9
FY 2007 – FY 2011 % NIC Inspections with only OTS Violations
10
FY 2007 – FY 2011 % of Inspections Contested
11
FY 2007 – FY 2011 Average Penalty /Serious Violation
12
FY 2007 – FY 2011 % Construction Inspections
13
FY 2007 – FY 2011 Significant Inspections
14
FY 2007 – FY 2011 Egregious Cases
15
FY 2007 – FY 2011 Fatality Inspections
16
Top Ten General Industry Violations 1. Hazard Communication 2. Respiratory Protection 3. Lockout/Tagout 4. Electrical, Wiring Methods 5. Powered Industrial Trucks 6. Electrical, General Requirements 7. Machine Guarding 8. Recordkeeping 9. Personal Protective Equipment 10. Mechanical Power- Transmission Apparatus
17
Top Ten Construction Violations 1. Scaffolding 2. Fall Protection 3. Ladders 4. Fall Protection, Training Requirements 5. Hazard Communication 6. General Safety & Health Provisions 7. Head Protection 8. Aerial Lifts 9. Eye & Face Protection 10. Excavation, Specific Excavation Requirements
18
FY 2011 – Top 10 Serious Violations 1. Scaffolding 2. Fall Protection 3. Hazard Communication 4. Lockout/Tagout 5. Electrical, Wiring Methods 6. Ladders 7. Powered Industrial Trucks 8. Machine Guarding 9. Respiratory Protection 10. Electrical, General Requirements
19
FY 2011 – Top 10 Willful Violations 1. Excavation, Protective Systems 2. Fall Protection 3. Grain Handling Facilities 4. Process Safety Management 5. Asbestos 6. Recordkeeping, General Recording Criteria 7. Lockout/Tagout 8. Safeguards for Personnel Protection 9. Lead 10. Recordkeeping, Recording Criteria
20
FY 2011 – Top 10 PSM Violations 1. 1910.119 J – Mechanical Integrity 2. 1910.119 D – Process Safety Information 3. 1910.119 F – Operating Procedures 4. 1910.119 E – Process Hazards Analysis 5. 1910.119 L – Management of Change 6. 1910.119 G – Training 7. 1910.119 O – Compliance Audits 8. 1910.119 H – Contractors 9. 1910.119 I – Pre-Startup Review 10. 1910.119 M – Incident Investigation
21
Stuff in the Works FOIA Manuals – Whistleblower and Enforcement GHS Referral system for inadequate MSDS SVEP - Serious Violators Inspection Program
22
Stuff in the Works NOISE Current policy: 1983 interpretation and current FOM policy CSHO must conduct a cost estimation of a hearing conservation program (HCP) and of engineering controls. CSHO must conduct a cost estimation of a hearing conservation program (HCP) and of engineering controls. Training We have estimated the cost of a HCP for a large company to be $310- 320 per employee per year and for a smaller company the numbers aren't in but we are hearing about $600/per year/employee. We have estimated the cost of a HCP for a large company to be $310- 320 per employee per year and for a smaller company the numbers aren't in but we are hearing about $600/per year/employee. Stakeholder Meeting Public comments New Noise Website
23
Stuff in the Works SVEP: As May 31, 2011, DEP has logged: 149 SVEP cases 27 (18 %) of the 149 SVEP cases are fatalities 101 (68 %) of the 149 SVEP cases are Non-fatality/Catastrophe Related to a High-Emphasis Hazard 1 (.7 %) of the 149 SVEP cases are Non-fatality/Catastrophe for PSM 93 (63 %) of the 149 SVEP cases are in construction 9 (10 %) of the 93 SVEP construction cases are fatalities Number of SVEP cases that are egregious cases: 20 (14 %) of 149 SVEP cases
24
Stuff in the Works SVEP In addition, there have been: 4 Follow-up inspections 13 General Industry- Related inspections, 1 of which was also an SVEP 1 Construction-Related inspection The Regional Offices also reported: 15 enhanced settlement agreement 20 company headquarters were sent copies of citations and/or notified 0 Section 11(b) case referred to SOL or filed with the courts Size of Employers (size based on # of employees controlled) 73 employers had 1-25 employees, 49 % of the SVEPs 35 employers had 26-100 employees, 24 % of the SVEPs 13 employers had 101-250 employees, 9 % of the SVEPs 27 employers had 251 employees or greater, 18 % of the SVEPs
25
Stuff in the Works SVEP Removal from te SVEP -
26
Stuff in the Works Directives: Workplace Violence Family Fatality CSHO Training Pyrotechnics
27
Stuff in the Works CSAs Status of Directive – with Assistant Secretary for signature Major Changes include: Clarifies the distinction between National and Regional CSAs OSHA may initiate negotiation of CSA Broadens the scope of enforcement issues appropriate for a CSA (no longer only egregious) Current Negotiations Sunoco USPS BP CVS
28
Stuff in the Works Penalties Continues to closely monitor metrics captured by IMIS Completing manual data collection to compare impact of penalty changes between FY 10 and FY 11 Challenges moving forward: Other OSHA policy changes impacting settlement negotiations
29
Stuff in the Works New NEPs Health Case Metals (Just released) Isocyanates Issues with NEPs How many is enough Should they have a sunset clause Should our strategy change
30
Stuff in the Works Initiatives Grain (will continue) Heat stress Under represented workers
31
Stuff in the Works Social media Apps Customer service project Click and fix ERGO
32
Standards Backing Operations – RFI, August 2011 Backing vehicles and equipment are common causes of struck-by injuries and can also cause caught between injuries when backing vehicles and equipment pin a worker against something else. OSHA is seeking comment on technological and non technological solutions to prevent back over incidents.
33
Standards Consensus Standards- Acetylene – DFR, August 2011 Construction Confined Spaces – Final – Fall 2011
34
Standards Cranes & Derricks-Underground & Demolition – DFR, August 2011 The final rule for Cranes & Derricks was issued on August 9th, 2010. This DFR will ensure that the Cranes & Derricks standard is applied to subsectors of construction work, demolition, and underground construction that were previously exempted from coverage.
35
Standards HazCom/GHS – Final, August 2011 This final rule modifies the current HCS to align with the provisions of the United Nations’ (UN) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). The modifications to the HCS will improve the quality and consistency of information provided to employers and employees regarding chemical hazards by providing harmonized criteria for classifying and labeling
36
Standards Infectious Diseases, Stakeholder Meeting, July 2011 Injury and Illness Prevention Program, SBREFA, June 2011 SIPs III – Final – Published June 8th, 2011
37
Standards Reinforced Concrete – ANPRM, June 2011 Current rules regarding reinforcing steel and post-tensioning activities do not adequately address worker hazards in work related to post-tensioning and reinforcing steel. OSHA is seeking public comment on Post-tensioning and Reinforcing Steel from professionals who work in the post- tensioning and reinforcing steel field and will consider rulemaking to prevent worker deaths and injuries related to these operations. OSHA hopes to determine whether a new rule is necessary, and, if so, what hazards need to be addressed.
38
QUESTIONS ???????
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.