1. EMH- 0 Efficient Market Hypothesis Eugene Fama, 1964 A market where there are huge number of rational, profit-maximizers actively competing, with each trying to predict the future market values of individual securities, and where important current information is almost freely available to all participants.

2. EMH- 1 The Implication of EMH The EMH has implications for investors and firms. –Since information is reflected in security prices quickly, knowing information when it is released does an investor no good. –Firms should expect to receive the fair value for securities that they sell. Firms cannot profit from fooling investors in an efficient market. –What changes stock prices? New Information! –What do we mean by new information? To managers, major shareholders vs. other investors

3. EMH- 2 Reaction of Stock Price to New Information in Efficient and Inefficient Markets Stock Price -30-20-10 0+10+20+30 Days before (-) and after (+) announcement Efficient market response to “good news” Overreaction to “good news” with reversion Delayed response to “good news”

4. EMH- 3 Reaction of Stock Price to New Information in Efficient and Inefficient Markets Stock Price -30-20-10 0+10+20+30 Days before (-) and after (+) announcement Efficient market response to “bad news” Overreaction to “bad news” with reversion Delayed response to “bad news”

5. EMH- 4 Forms of Efficient Market Hypothesis Weak Form Efficient Market –Prices reflect information set of past prices –Is there any strong relationship between current and past returns? Semi-strong Form Efficient Market –Prices reflect publicly available information –Is there significant market reactions to public announcements? Strong Form Efficient Market –Prices reflect all information relevant to a stock –Is future price predictable?

6. EMH- 5 Weak Form Market Efficiency Security prices reflect all information found in past prices and volume. Often weak-form efficiency is represented as P t = P t-1 + Expected return + random error t If the weak form of market efficiency holds, then technical analysis is of no value. Since stock prices only respond to new information, which by definition arrives randomly, stock prices are said to follow a random walk.

7. EMH- 6 Random Walk Theory The movement of stock prices from day to day DO NOT reflect any pattern. Statistically speaking, the movement of stock prices is random (skewed positive over the long term).

8. EMH- 7 Past vs. Future Returns: Microsoft

9. EMH- 8 Past vs. Future Returns: Dow Jones Index

10. EMH- 9 Past vs. Future Returns: CAC Index

11. EMH- 10 Can past return predict future return? Fama(1965): 1st order autocorrelation (about.03) Fama and French (1986): Higher order autocorrleation is negative and even smaller Other variables help to explain longer term return –Dividend yield –E-P ratio –high-low grade bond yield spread

12. EMH- 11 Semi-strong EMH - Event studies Security Prices reflect all publicly available information. In M&A, average increase for the target firms’ stock price is about 15%, while the average daily return is only.04% Stock price seem to adjust within a day to event announcement

13. EMH- 12 Event Studies: How Tests Are Structured  Event Studies are one type of test of the semi- strong form of market efficiency. This form of the EMH implies that prices should reflect all publicly available information.  To test this, event studies examine prices and returns over time—particularly around the arrival of new information.  Test for evidence of under reaction, overreaction, early reaction, delayed reaction around the event.

14. EMH- 13 Event Studies: Dividend Omissions Efficient market response to “bad news” S.H. Szewczyk, G.P. Tsetsekos, and Z. Santout “Do Dividend Omissions Signal Future Earnings or Past Earnings?” Journal of Investing (Spring 1997)

15. EMH- 14 Some Interesting Results of Event Studies –New stock issue : (-3% usually) –Share Repurchase –Change of dividend –Stock split

16. EMH- 15 Strong-Form EMH One group of studies of strong-form market efficiency investigates insider trading. Buy-and-hold strategy beat most of the other strategy Portfolio performance of WSJ specialists vs. random selection Studies of Value Line –Adjusted for risk and size, G1 stocks have higher return than G5 stocks up to 1 year-horizon (Huberman and Kandel) –The announcement of G2 stocks change to G1 bring 2.44% permanent return over 3 days. (Stcikel, 1985) –The effect of rank change is stronger for small firms (Stcikel, 1985)

17. EMH- 16 Strong-form EMH : Mutual Fund

18. EMH- 17 The Record of Mutual Funds Taken from Lubos Pastor and Robert F. Stambaugh, “Evaluating and Investing in Equity Mutual Funds,” unpublished paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago (March 2000).

19. EMH- 18 Strong-form EMH Mutual fund performance –Jensen (1969) 1945-1964, return to investors:1% lower per year than index (after management and other expense, but before loan fees) –Ippolito(1989) 1965-1984,.83% per year above index –Experience of Taiwan vs. US –Problem of index choice

20. EMH- 19 Relationship among Three Different Information Sets All information relevant to a stock Information set of publicly available information Information set of past prices

21. EMH- 20 Evidence against EMH Stock Market Crash of 1987 –The market dropped between 20 percent and 25 percent on a Monday following a weekend during which little surprising information was released. Size effect Temporal Anomalies –January effect –Monday effect –Sunshine and full moon Speculative Bubbles –Sometimes a crowd of investors can behave as a single squirrel.

22. EMH- 21 Some Criticism Is EMH is testable? –Problem of joint testing between EMH and CAPM Does EMH suggest that we can randomly choose the components of portfolio, since the securities are always fairly priced?