Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byScott O’Connor’ Modified over 9 years ago
1
Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006 Class1: Ana Costa, André Sena, Duarte Pinto, Inês Brandão, João Silva, Lídia Sousa, Luís Barros, Márcia Marinho, Maria Rocha, Pedro Falcão, Rafael Silva, Sara Tapa, Susana Franco. Supervisors: Altamiro da Costa Pereira, MD, PhD; Cristina Santos, MD, PhD Introduction to Medicine Porto Faculty of Medicine 2006/2007
2
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
3
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003 Deeks J. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. BMJ 2001 Smidt N, Rutjes A WS, et al. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC 2006 Cunningham, F.Gary. Williams obstetrics, 26 edição (2005) Berek, Jonathan S. Novak’s gynecology 12 edição (1996) Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annuals of internal Medicine. 2003 Deeks J. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. BMJ 2001 Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
4
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003 Deeks J. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. BMJ 2001 Smidt N, Rutjes A WS, et al. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC 2006 Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
5
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResults Conclusions Introduction Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
6
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResults Conclusions Introduction Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
7
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
8
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions The query Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
9
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions The query Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
10
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Limits and selection criteria Periods (one for each selector): - 2006 to 2006 - 2005 to 2005 - 2004 to 2004 - 2000 to 2003 - 1995 to 1999 Language restriction - English - Portuguese Humans Inclusion - report a study of diagnostic accuracy - the diagnostic test(s) is(are) used in obstetrics and/or gynecology - abstract is available Exclusion - is a clinical trial, a letter, an editorial, a practice guideline, a meta-analyse or a review Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
11
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Limits and selection criteria Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Inclusion - report a study of diagnostic accuracy - the diagnostic test(s) is(are) used in obstetrics and/or gynecology - abstract is available Exclusion - is a clinical trial, a letter, an editorial, a practice guideline, a meta-analyse or a review Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
12
2006200520042000-2003 ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Samples 1995-1999 1020304050 Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Articles in the final sample A random sample of 10 articles is obtained from each period Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
13
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Evaluation with the STARD 50 Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Articles in the final sample Each article is submitted to two independent evaluations (according to the STARD parameters) Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
14
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Analyze in SPSS Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Data from the evaluation is analyzed in SPSS Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
15
Data from the evaluation is analyzed in SPSS ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Outcome of results Articles’ search and selection Articles’ evaluation Statistical analyze Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
16
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
17
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Final selection states The probability of the article not be excluded by the 2nd selector if it had being also not excluded by the 1st one was 92% Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
18
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Causes of exclusion Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
19
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Causes of exclusion Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
20
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Agreement between evaluators Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
21
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Presence of the items in the articles But it was revealed an evolution in the report of items 10, 13, 20 Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
22
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes The evolution The only difference with statistical significant is between 1995-1990 and 2005 Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
23
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Relation between articles’ Score and the Impact Factor Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
24
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions From articles’ selection From articles’ analyzes Relation between articles’ Score and the Impact Factor Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
25
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
26
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
27
ObjectivesMethodsAcknowledgmentsResultsIntroduction Conclusions Acknowledgments to… Evolution of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy in obstetrics and gynecology literature between 1995 and 2006: 2006/2007
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.