Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byShana Simmons Modified over 9 years ago
1
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Simulation of the efficiency of hydrogen recombiners as safety devices Ernst-Arndt Reinecke, Stephan Kelm, Wilfried Jahn, Christian Jäkel, Hans-Josef Allelein International Conference on Hydrogen Safety September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA
2
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 2E.-A. Reinecke et al. Overview Simulation of the efficiency of hydrogen recombiners as safety devices Passive auto-catalytic recombiner (PAR) Goal of the numerical study Scenario investigated Model approach Results
3
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 3E.-A. Reinecke et al. Unintended H 2 release inside confined space safety measuredevice detectionsensor release interruptionautomatic valve avoid hydrogen accumulation and ignition/explosion ventilation recombiner
4
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 4E.-A. Reinecke et al. Passive auto-catalytic recombiner (PAR)
5
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 5E.-A. Reinecke et al. Commercial PARs in Nuclear Power Plants Vendors AECL, Canada AREVA, France/Germany NIS, Germany Source: Siempelkamp
6
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 6E.-A. Reinecke et al. Operational boundary conditions NPP containment large temperature and density gradients large natural convection loops large geometry (20,000-70,000 m³, typical length scales 5-50 m) steam-inertized in early accident phase Typical H2 and FC applications significant smaller scales different thermal hydraulic conditions NPP PAR applicability ? H2 & FC GOAL:
7
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 7E.-A. Reinecke et al. Scenario
8
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 8E.-A. Reinecke et al. Source: CEA Experiment GARAGE facility at CEA/France single vehicle private garage (~40 m³) concentration measurement at ~60 pos. Test 1: He release (~2 g/s) for ~2 min data recently published: Gupta et al., Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009) 5902–5911
9
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 9E.-A. Reinecke et al. Release scenario and measurement locations
10
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 10E.-A. Reinecke et al. Approach Scenario based on GARAGE experiment (CEA) 1.Simulation of the helium release and distribution scenario and validation against experimental data 2.Replace helium by hydrogen and verify the calculated distribution 3.Add a PAR to the scenario and compare mitigated/unmitigated scenario
11
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 11E.-A. Reinecke et al. Model approach
12
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 12E.-A. Reinecke et al. Coupled Modeling Approach Macro ScaleMeso ScaleMicro Scale REKO-DIREKT (in-house) ANSYS CFX
13
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 13E.-A. Reinecke et al. PAR model: REKO-DIREKT Input: T, y i, p Output: T, y i, mchemical (catalytical) reaction natural convection Chimney Catalyst section mass/heat transfer
14
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 14E.-A. Reinecke et al. T / °C y H2 / Vol.-% CFX REKO-DIREKT - Inlet gas temperature - Inlet gas composition - Pressure REKO-DIREKT CFX - Outlet gas temperature - Outlet gas composition - Mass flow through PAR REKO-DIREKT CFX REKO-DIREKT
15
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 15E.-A. Reinecke et al. Results
16
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 16E.-A. Reinecke et al. Unmitigated release - setup Physical Model: Half Symmetry RANS equations Ideal gas equation of state Isothermal SST-model incl. buoyancy prod. & dissipation Injection He: 240 g (1,99 g/s) H2: 120 g (0,99 g/s) Wall functions at inner walls Vent: Outlet Boundary
17
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 17E.-A. Reinecke et al. Helium/Hydrogen concentration profiles
18
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 18E.-A. Reinecke et al. Mitigated release - setup Physical Model: Half Symmetry RANS equations Ideal gas equation of state SST-model incl. buoyancy prod. & dissipation Injection H2: 120 g (0,99 g/s) Wall functions at inner walls +Fixed Wall Temperature +Temperature dependent properties +No heat radiation Vent: Outlet Boundary
19
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 19E.-A. Reinecke et al. Comparison mitigated/unmitigated scenario 800 s 240 s 120 s
20
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 20E.-A. Reinecke et al. Comparison mitigated/unmitigated scenario
21
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 21E.-A. Reinecke et al. Details mitigated scenario
22
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 22E.-A. Reinecke et al. PAR model details
23
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 23E.-A. Reinecke et al. Flammable cloud volume histories
24
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 24E.-A. Reinecke et al. Performance (estimates) Processor 1 CPU Quadcore I7-860, 2.8 GHz Open Suse Linux 11.3 CFX 12.1 Calculation time (1200 s) unmitigated scenario: ~10 d mitigated scenario: ~40 d REKO-DIREKT: ~6 min more time steps more gas components (H2+O2+N2+H2O)
25
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 25E.-A. Reinecke et al. Conclusions
26
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 26E.-A. Reinecke et al. Conclusions (1/2) Goal investigate the applicability of PAR from NPP containment to typical H2&FC application significant differences in operational boundary conditions first study based on GARAGE experiment, performed with ANSYS- CFX and REKO-DIREKT Results H 2 injection of 1.5 m³, flammable cloud was removed within 10 minutes hot exhaust plume promotes the transport of hydrogen rich gas mixture towards the PAR inlet
27
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 27E.-A. Reinecke et al. Conclusions (2/2) Next steps parameter variation injection rate, location, and direction PAR design and number geometry of the enclosure consideration of possible PAR ignition scenarios validation against mitigation experiments in new multi-compartment facility, currently under construction at JÜLICH
28
ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 28E.-A. Reinecke et al. Thank you for your attention !
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.