1. presented by Mark DiCamillo Director, The Field Poll November 15, 2012 CSU, Sacramento presented by Mark DiCamillo Director, The Field Poll November 15, 2012 CSU, Sacramento

2. The Field Poll About The Field Poll’s final pre-election survey Population Surveyed:California registered voters considered likely to vote in the November general election. Interviewing Dates:October 17-30, 2012. Sample divided into two approximately equal size interviewing periods -- Wave 1: October 17-24 and Wave 2: October 25-30. Mode of Administration:Landline and cell phone by live interviewers working from Field’s central location call center in San Diego. Number of Interviews:1,912 registered voters, of whom 1,566 were considered likely to vote. Languages ofEnglish, Spanish, Cantonese, Administration:Mandarin, Korean, Vietnamese. Asian Sample Asian-Americans were Augmentation:oversampled and included 440 registered voters to permit comparisons with white non- Hispanic, Latino and African- American voters. Table 1

3. The Field Poll Trend of California presidential preferences between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney Table 2 Source: The Field Poll.

4. The Field Poll Trend of California voter image ratings of Barack Obama Table 3 Source: The Field Poll.

5. The Field Poll Trend of California voter impressions of Mitt Romney Table 4 Source: The Field Poll. Unfavorable Favorable

6. The Field Poll Is your preference more a vote for your candidate or a vote against his opponent? Obama VotersRomney Voters Table 5 Source: Late October 2012 Field Poll.

7. The Field Poll Trend of California voter preferences for U.S. Senate Table 6 Source: The Field Poll. Feinstein (D) Emken (R)

8. The Field Poll Trend of California voter impressions of Dianne Feinstein during this year’s election campaign Table 7 Source: The Field Poll. Favorable Unfavorable

9. The Field Poll Trend of California voter impressions of Elizabeth Emken Table 8 Source: The Field Poll. Favorable Unfavorable

10. The Field Poll Trend of California voter preferences on Prop. 30, the Governor’s tax increase initiative Table 9 Source: The Field Poll. Yes voters No voters

11. The Field Poll Factors affecting voting preferences on Proposition 30 Table 10 Source: Late October 2012 Field Poll.

12. The Field Poll Trend of California voter preferences on Prop. 31, the state budget reform initiative Table 11 Source: The Field Poll. Yes voters No voters

13. The Field Poll Trend of California voter preferences on Prop. 32, the payroll deductions for political contributions initiative Table 12 Source: The Field Poll. No voters Yes voters

14. The Field Poll Trend of California voter preferences on Prop. 34, to repeal the death penalty Table 13 Source: The Field Poll. Yes voters No voters

15. The Field Poll How views about the death penalty and life in prison without parole relate to voting preferences on Prop. 34 Table 14

16. The Field Poll Trend of California voter preferences on Prop. 38, the Munger tax increase initiative Table 15 Source: The Field Poll. No voters Yes voters

17. The Field Poll Trend of California voter preferences on Prop. 39, the business tax for energy funding initiative Table 16 Source: The Field Poll. Yes voters No voters

18. The Field Poll 19942012 in 000’s% %  Total registered voters14,724100%18,246100%+3,522,000 White non-Hispanic10,750(73%)11,000(60%)+250,000 Latino2,200(15%)4,200(23%)+2,000,000 African-American900(6%)1,046(6%)+146,000 Asian-American/other874(6%)2,000(11%)+1,126,000 The growing influence of ethnic voters in the California electorate Table 17 Source: Totals from the California Secretary of State. Ethnic subgroups are Field Poll estimates.

19. The Field Poll Differences in the party registration of California voters by race/ethnicity Table 18 Source: Total percentages are from the California Secretary of State, while subgroup percentages are Field Poll estimates