Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRebecca Rose Modified over 10 years ago
1
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group UKCCSC Meeting 18 th April Nottingham Natural analogues of CO 2 leakage from the Colorado Plateau Stuart Gilfillan, Stuart Haszeldine, Zoe Shipton and Mark Wilkinson
2
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Key Questions 1.How do natural CO 2 storage sites fail? - Faults, lithology, caprock seal and groundwater regime. 2.What are the pathways of CO 2 migration to the surface? - Can we predict/prevent leakage in engineered sites? 3.How long does CO 2 migration to the surface take? - CO 2 needs to be stored for 10,000 years. 4.Can leakage of CO 2 be monitored and quantified? - Which chemical tracers can be used. - How effective are they at monitoring natural CO 2 leakage?
3
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Colorado Plateau
4
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Colorado Plateau Green River Seeps and Salt Wash fault zone, Utah
5
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group -Cold water springs and geysers driven by pressure of CO 2. - Gas is 95 - 99% CO 2 - 0.5 - 3.5 % N 2 - Trace noble gases. -CO 2 release from > 80ka. -Where does this water and CO 2 originate from? -How is this CO 2 being transported to the surface? Green River Seeps and Salt Wash fault zone, Utah Crystal geyser, Utah Colorado Plateau
6
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Origin of the Water? -Salinity of erupted water indicates migration of water from deep aquifer.
7
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Deep aquifer Shallow aquifer Origin of the Water?
8
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group From Ballentine et al. 2002 Magmatic Component 3 He Origin of the CO 2 ?
9
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group From Ballentine et al. 2002 Magmatic Component 3 He Atmospheric Component Aquifer Recharge 20 Ne 36 Ar 84 Kr Formation Water Origin of the CO 2 ?
10
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group From Ballentine et al. 2002 Magmatic Component 3 He RadiogenicComponent In-situproduction 4 He 21 Ne 40 Ar Atmospheric Component Aquifer Recharge 20 Ne 36 Ar 84 Kr Formation Water Accumulate in groundwater Origin of the CO 2 ?
11
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Origin of the CO 2 – CO 2 / 3 He ratio Mantle CO 2 / 3 He range: 1 x 10 9 – 1 x 10 10 Measured from Mid Ocean Ridge Basalts - MORBs
12
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group 707580859095100 1.00e+6 1.00e+7 1.00e+8 1.00e+9 1.00e+10 1.00e+11 1.00e+12 CO 2 Concentration (%) Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 10 9 – 1 x 10 10 Above 1 x 10 10 : Crustal CO 2 Below 1 x 10 9 : CO 2 lost relative to 3 He. Origin of the CO 2 – CO 2 / 3 He ratio CO 2 / 3 He Ratio
13
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Predominantly crustal derived CO 2 erupted from the Green River seeps. Small mantle component 1 – 16% Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 10 9 – 1 x 10 10 1 - 16% Mantle CO 2 Origin of the CO 2 – CO 2 / 3 He ratio 707580859095100 1.00e+6 1.00e+7 1.00e+8 1.00e+9 1.00e+10 1.00e+11 1.00e+12 Green River Seeps CO 2 Concentration (%) CO 2 / 3 He Ratio Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 10 9 – 1 x 10 10
14
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Conclusions
15
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Other natural analogues of CO 2 leakage Hurricane Fault, Utah -Active, steeply dipping normal fault ~ 250 km long, ~2.5 km displacement. -CO 2 & 40°C water discharges from fault zone. -Noble gas and δ 13 C (CO 2 ) analysis underway. -No evidence of a CO 2 reservoir at depth. Hurricane fault looking north www.skytrailsranch.com
16
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Other natural analogues of CO 2 leakage Hurricane Fault, Utah -Active, steeply dipping normal fault ~ 250 km long, ~2.5 km displacement. -CO 2 & 40°C water discharges from fault zone. -Noble gas and δ 13 C (CO 2 ) analysis underway. -No evidence of a CO 2 reservoir at depth. St. Johns Dome -Large natural CO 2 reservoir (445 billion m 3 ). -CO 2 rich surface seeps and travertines. -Composition of deep gas and waters known. -Can natural CO 2 can be chemically tagged? e.g. using δ 13 C(CO 2 ) and/or noble gases.
17
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group St. Johns Dome Workflow -Water samples collected from 18 surface seeps - 14 C & tritium for groundwater dating. - Solute chemistry. - Noble gas, δ 13 C(CO 2 ), δ 18 O and δD isotopes. -Compare composition of surface seeps to known chemistry of reservoir fluids. -Use geochemical modeling to determine and quantify mineralogy changes as CO 2 migrates. -Reservoir models underway to investigate CO 2 migration pathways and timescales.
18
School of GeoSciences Subsurface Research Group Summary 1.How do natural CO 2 storage sites fail? - Primary mechanism is migration along fault planes. 2.What are the pathways of CO 2 migration to the surface? - CO 2 is dissolved into the groundwater and transported along faults. 3.How long does CO 2 migration to the surface take? - Unknown at present, dating of CO 2 deposits will hopefully provide a timeframe. 4.Can leakage of CO 2 be monitored and quantified? - Yes, a baseline geochemical survey helps a lot!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.