Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRandell Daniels Modified over 9 years ago
1
Quality Improvement Initiatives
2
National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease-UK Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP)-USA National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-US Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry-Germany
3
Quality Improvement Initiatives Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS)-Canada Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary heart Disease database (APPROACH)-Canada Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment (EFFECT)-Canada
5
0 20 30 40 Teaching Hospital Community Hospital Small Hospital Time (minutes) Door-to-Needle time for thrombolytic therapy Benchmark 30 min 38 min37 min 40 min Ontario average = 37 min 12/44 hospitals met benchmark EFFECT STUDY
6
Type of physician caring for heart attack patients 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent Cardiologist General Internist Family Physician 32% 34% 30% EFFECT STUDY 4% are Other
7
Door-to-Needle Time Was 11 minutes less when Emergency physician made decision to administer thrombolytic therapy Was 10 minutes less when thrombolytic therapy was administered in Emergency Department rather than in CCU/ICU
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.