1. Speech Communication Assessment Day Critical Thinking

2. Introductions

6. Did you like these questions? 2. The speaker creates a thesis and message relevant to the audience. YES ___ NO ___ N/A ___ 3. The speaker reasons logically, providing evidence that supports the thesis. YES ___ NO ___ N/A ___ 4. The speaker provides oral reference to credible sources exposing bias as necessary (e.g., author/authority, title, date, website, data base, journal, book, etc.) YES ___ NO ___ N/A ___

7. 2014-2015 Results Total Response 3,176!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Speech Faculty are #1 We had more responses than anyone else

8. Best Practices How many used the Thinker’s Guide to Analytic Thinking? How many used the wheel? Who created a new assignment to prepare students for critical thinking assessment? Share? Please? What might you do in the future?

9. Supporting materials a. minimal or insufficient use or synthesis of supporting materials. b. partial or nearly sufficient use or synthesis of supporting materials. c. synthesis of appropriate supporting materials. d. synthesis of significant supporting materials. #AnswerResponse% 1A. Minimal or insufficient use or synthesis of supporting materials 2177% 2B. Partial or nearly sufficient use or synthesis of supporting materials 58019% 3C. Synthesis of appropriate supporting materials 1,04233% 4D. Synthesis of significant supporting materials 90629% 0E. Not Assessed38312% Total3,128100%

10. The speaker creates a thesis and message relevant to the audience. #AnswerResponse% 1Yes2,43978% 2No2117% 3N/A1806% 0Not Assessed2979% Total3,127100%

11. The speaker reasons logically, providing evidence that supports the thesis #AnswerResponse% 1Yes2,31974% 2No30310% 3N/A2097% 0Not Assessed2929% Total3,123100%

12. The speaker provides oral reference to credible sources exposing bias as necessary #AnswerResponse% 1Yes1,82358% 2No66321% 3N/A2608% 0Not Assessed37912% Total3,125100%

13. Discussion?

14. Break Eat Drink and Be Merry for 10 minutes and then sober up and get back to work

15. Interpersonal Communication Assessment Plan Liza Schellpfeffer and Tina Tan

16. Interpersonal Communication Assessment Plan (Liza Schellpfeffer and Tina Tan) 2014 – 2015 Researched/ reviewed available IC-type Assessment Tools Contact Kory Floyd for advise on any known IC Assessment Tools Reviewed 181-statement Spitzberg and Cupach measure Categorized relevant statement under five areas (Floyd’s Competent Communicator): Adaptability, Cognitive Complexity, Empathy, Ethics, Self Awareness Feedback from Mayra and Mollie on new categorization Laura Blasi advised we generate our own version of statements

17. Interpersonal Communication Assessment Plan (Liza Schellpfeffer and Tina Tan) 2015 – 2016 Plan Work with Laura Blasi’s team to create a Likert-scale tool with statements Pilot tool in Fall 2015 Implement tool in all 1017 classes in Spring 2016

18. Discuss and Revise 5 Year Goals Year 4: 2015-16 already targeted for Interpersonal Communication Year 5: 2016-17 Creating a rubric to measure communication competency from an interpersonal standpoint College-wide assessment of communication

19. We’re out of here Turning it over to Deidre Holmes DuBois and April Raneri