Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byScot Bailey Modified over 9 years ago
1
Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND NO. 2011-XXXXP 2-D Electron and Metastable Density Profiles Produced in Helium FIW Discharges B. R. Weatherford and E. V. Barnat Sandia National Laboratories Z. Xiong and M. J. Kushner University of Michigan
2
Fast Ionization Waves (FIWs) Nanosecond-duration, overvoltage (> breakdown) E-fields Diffuse volume discharge at elevated pressures High-energy electrons efficiently drive inelastic processes Ideal for large volume, uniform, high pressure production of: Photons Charged particles Excited species Proposed Applications: Pulsed UV light sources / laser pumping High-pressure plasma chemistry Plasma-assisted combustion Runaway electron generation 2
3
Current Understanding of FIWs Axial FIW propagation studied extensively Capacitive probes Average E-fields, e - density Optical emission 2-D profiles, wave speeds Laser diagnostics Spatially resolved E-fields Radial variations important, but still unclear Varying E-field? Higher density or T e ? Photons? Applications may require volume uniformity What do profiles tell us about the physics? 3 Increasing Pressure Vasilyak (1994) Takashima (2011) Positive Polarity Negative Polarity Helium FIW, 20 Torr, 11 kV
4
Experimental Setup - Chamber Discharge Tube: 3.3 cm ID x 25.4 cm long HV electrode inside Teflon sleeve, grounded shield Imaged area: 20-140 mm from ground electrode Helium feed gas Pressure 1-20 Torr ~14 kV (open load) +HV pulses 20 ns duration, 3 ns rise time 1 kHz pulse rep rate 4
5
2-D LCIF Diagnostic Scheme 2-D maps of electron densities acquired from helium line intensity ratios Pump 2 3 S metastables to 3 3 P with 389 nm laser Electron collisions transfer from 3 3 P 3 3 D Image LIF @ 389 nm (3 3 P-2 3 S) and LCIF @ 588 nm (3 3 D-2 3 P) after the laser pulse Ratio depends linearly on e- density 5 Barnat (2009)
6
Electron Densities vs. Pressure Density maps @ fixed rep rate & voltage, 1-16 Torr ICCD delay time: 100 ns after FIW, 20 ns window Peak densities on scale of 10 11 cm -3 for all pressures Low P center-peaked High P wall-peaked Max uniformity, n e at intermediate pressure 6 Wavefront Motion Increasing Pressure Key Questions: What causes the transition in e - densities? Can we explain this with a model? Key Questions: What causes the transition in e - densities? Can we explain this with a model?
7
Metastable Densities vs. Pressure Helium 2 3 S metastable profiles, 1-16 Torr Relative densities from LIF intensities Laser absorption measurements for calibration (B. Yee) Same general trends, but less drastic than n e Center-peaked to volume- filling / uniform Similar FIW decay lengths 7 Wavefront Motion Increasing Pressure
8
Simulation Results - nonPDPSIM 2-D fluid simulation Photon transport Stepwise ionization Plasma chemistry EEDF calculated from two- term expansion of Boltzmann equation Same voltage pulse shape as in experiment Simulations produce similar results as LCIF N e ~ 10 11 -10 12 cm -3 Trend in radial profiles with variable pressure Wave velocities ~ cm/ns 8 1 Torr Profiles 16 Torr Profiles (Xiong and Kushner)
9
Electrons vs. Metastables 9 Experiment: n e, N He* have different radial profiles @ high pressure Metastables shifted to center Model: n e, N He* track each other Model results rule out: Volume photoionization Photoelectrons from wall nene 16 Torr Profiles - Simulation N He* Key Questions: Why are these profiles different? What does this say about FIW physics? Key Questions: Why are these profiles different? What does this say about FIW physics? He* Profiles - Experiment (Behind wavefront) nene N He* Top: Experiment Bottom: Simulation
10
E-field, Effective T e Distributions 10 Simulations Strong radial E near wall Exceeds runaway e- threshold (~210 Td in He) Radial E exceeds axial E in and behind FIW front 1 Torr: Mean e - energy nearly uniform E-field fills much of the volume 16 Torr: Mean e - energy highest at wall E-field drops rapidly away from wall Electrons cool via collisions 16 Torr – T e and E 1 Torr – T e and E Axis Axial & Radial E, 16 Torr Inside wavefront Wall Axial & Radial E, 16 Torr Behind wavefront Axis Wall
11
Effect of Runaway Electrons σ iz peaks near 150 eV, σ He* at 30 eV Radial fast e- flux in cylindrical geometry competing processes: Focusing of e - flux, scales as 1/r Loss of “fast” flux via inelastic collisions Cooling of fast electrons via elastic collisions 1-D production profiles estimated due to radial runaway e - flux from wall 11 Electron cooling separated e - and He* profiles Fixed energy vs. r captures pressure trend Ionization, 2 3 S Cross-sections 30 eV e-, constant energy 4 Torr, with collisional cooling Initial Energies
12
Summary 2-D maps of electron and 2 3 S metastable densities in a positive polarity He FIW measured using LCIF/LIF Center-peaked n e at low pressure, wall-peaked at high pressure Metastable profiles shift from center-peaked to volume-filling Intermediate pressures highest densities and uniformity 2-D fluid simulations capture similar trends in n e Peak e- densities of 10 11 -10 12 cm -3 ; shift in radial profiles Predicts metastable distributions which track e - densities Radial E-fields yielding runaway e - may explain the difference Runaway electrons are difficult to capture in fluid model Dropoff in E at high pressure fast e - from walls lose energy High energy ionization; Lower energy metastable production Energy decay along radius causes spatial separation in profiles 12
13
Thank you! Questions? Comments? This work was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Fusion Energy Science Contract DE-SC0001939. 13
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.