1. GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM GMS CEP-BCI Phase II Results Monitoring Framework GMS Environment Operations Center

2. GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Monitoring during Phase 1 Multiple different sets of monitoring – Program DMF – DPSIR monitoring framework developed to track BCI and other program elements (impact level) – Financial monitoring – Activity monitoring under LoAs Challenges and opportunities – Lack of consistent follow up and application of MF – Fragmentation of information collection and reporting Opportunities for Phase 2 – Transition from monitoring inputs and outputs / activity delivery to tracking results at a program level

3. GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Phase 2 Results Monitoring Framework Level 1: GMS development trends IMPACT LEVEL Tracked through: GMS Statistics Level 1: GMS development trends IMPACT LEVEL Tracked through: GMS Statistics Level 3: CEP-BCI operational efficiency INPUT LEVEL tracked through: Annual financial, administration reports and program evaluations Level 3: CEP-BCI operational efficiency INPUT LEVEL tracked through: Annual financial, administration reports and program evaluations Level 2: Effectiveness of CEP-BCI interventions OUTCOME AND OUTPUT LEVEL Tracked through: DMF annual updates, progress reporting Level 2: Effectiveness of CEP-BCI interventions OUTCOME AND OUTPUT LEVEL Tracked through: DMF annual updates, progress reporting How effective have CEP-BCI activities been in contributing to development outcomes? How efficient are CEP- BCI operations and staff? What progress has been made on development in the GMS?

4. GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Level 1: GMS Development Trends Tracks IMPACT level trends – Changes in these trends are a result of cumulative efforts of all partners over time. Adapted DPSIR framework from Phase 1; Applicable at four levels: Regional, National, Landscape / Provincial and Site level Examples of themes tracked: changing demographic situation, dependence on primary resources, climate change, land use change Tracked through: GMS-EOC interactive web tools (GMS Statistics, Interactive Atlas)

5. GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Level 2: Effectiveness of CEP-BCI interventions Tracks OUTPUTS and OUTCOMES which can be linked directly to CEP-BCI Components and subcomponents: Targets for 2016 outlined in program DMF; Annual milestones and indicators proposed in component strategies (2013 to 2015) Activity level indicators and targets developed during activity scoping Reported through EOC and NSU progress reporting to WGE, individual activity progress reporting

6. GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Level 3: Efficiency of EOC operations Tracks inputs and operational (financial and staff) efficiency of EOC Some examples: – Program performance (Timeliness of reporting, % of annual milestones met, effectiveness and relevance rating during program evaluation) – Financial mobilization (% overheads / EOC cost, annual disbursement and liquidation ratios) – EOC / NSU staff resources (gender, GMS nationals, NSU participation) Reported through EOC and NSU progress reports to WGE