Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBeatrix Harmon Modified over 9 years ago
3
Your meeting host team: Tom Hocking – National TPP Team Data Manager - TWHocking@gmail.com Notes/Report/FB Global TPP Page Lisa Oldendorp – In-call questions National TPP Team Chat Manager Your meeting host team: Tom Hocking – National TPP Team Data Manager - TWHocking@gmail.com MoveOn Regional Organizer, PA Notes/Report/FB Global TPP Page Lisa Oldendorp – In-call questions MoveOn Regional Organizer, NY National TPP Team Chat Manager eslsk8r@optonline.net Mara Cohen – Returning soon MoveOn Regional Organizer, IL MCMoveOn@gmail.com
6
Copy and paste this link to send a letter: http://bit.ly/IO9hXO Email us a link to your published letter so we can share it: amiller6210@gmail.com amiller6210@gmail.com
11
Emilianne Slaydon Director, Social Media @TPP Media March TPP Tuesday Twitter Storms eslaydon@mac.com Special Tweets this week: http://bit.ly/1cLBYlQ
13
http://www.prosperousamerica.org Report on Congressional Fly-in Week Visits to 100 members of Congress Manufacturing in the Golden State Conference in L.A. March 19, 2014 Shortened event link: http://bit.ly/1p02Yhx
15
www.citizen.org
20
Document that new trade deals will NOT add to trade deficit Document the likely net effect on overall employment Document the net effect on pay and living standards Ensure no diminishment of consumer protections Ensure that all trading partners comply with ILO principles and conventions Ensure that environmental standards are not degraded and are enforceable Ensure that these social goals are enforceable Ensure that Congress plays a meaningful role in setting and enforcing priorities on the USTR
21
TPP Countries Not Adopting Either Convention U.S., Vietnam, Brunei TPP Countries Not Adopting Freedom of Association U.S. Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, Singapore TPP Countries Not Adopting Right to Organize and Collectively Bargain U.S., Vietnam, Brunei, Canada
23
Daily Minimum Wages (January 2013 in Dollars)
24
Employers are now twice more likely to use ten or more coercive tactics in their anti-union campaigns than they were before the adoption of NAFTA in 1993. Employer threats made during organizing campaigns to close plants if workers voted for a union rose from 29% in the mid- 1980s to 50% in the two years following the adoption of NAFTA to 57% during the mid-2000s. Actual plant closings where these threats were made following union elections rose from 2% to 15% during this period. While there are many reasons for plant closings, the incentives to off-shore jobs and investment due to trade agreements are clearly important. The example of the movement of auto-assembly plants from the U.S. to Mexico is well documented. Source: Kate Bronfenbrenner, “No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing, American Rights at Work and Economic Policy Institute, 2009
25
FavorOppose Not sure 62% Strongly 43% 28% Strongly 12%
27
More likely to vote for candidate Less likely to vote for candidate Democrats Independents GOP Conserv. GOP Northeast South Midwest West 17 47 68 74 46 44 39 43 Less Likely to Vote For
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.