2. 2 2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2 Name OrganizationE-mailPhone Gerry VernonCity Manager (J.C.) gerry.vernon@jcks.com238-3103gerry.vernon@jcks.com Ron FehrCity Manager (Manhattan)fehr@cityofmhk.com 587-2404fehr@cityofmhk.com COL William Clark Fort Riley Garrison Cdr william.j.clark1.mil@mail.mil239-2092william.j.clark1.mil@mail.mil Ben BennettGeary County Commissionerben.bennett@gearycounty.org 226-5522ben.bennett@gearycounty.org Dave LewisRiley County Commissionerdlewis@rileycountyks.gov 313-0781dlewis@rileycountyks.gov John Armbrust Gov Mil CouncilJohn@manhattan.org776-8829John@manhattan.org ISP Core Advisory Body Senior Advisory Member Voting Members The Core Body is currently represented by Junction City, Manhattan, Geary County, Riley County, and Fort Riley. Role: Serves in an advisory capacity to guide and facilitate the ISP - Selects WG membership from Organization - Serves as Guides and Mentors for WG’s - Serves as a sounding board for issues raised by the WG’s - Votes whether to pursue concepts developed by the WG’s - Identifies potential topics for input into the WGs

3. 3 2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 3 Working Group Overview Core Body Public Works WG Transit WG Human Capital WG Recreation WG Emergency Svcs WG Business Ops/ Finance/Procurement WG - Six Working Group topics have been initially identified - Topic Leads have been identified for each of the six WGs

4. 4 2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 4 Process Overview ARFORGEN CALENDAR FY11-14 Monthly WG Meetings --in person initially…virtual meetings once WG matured Scheduled Bi-Monthly --meet as required Quarterly Updates to FHRC Inputs Outputs Ideas for specific partnership opportunities based on: Strengths, Capabilities, Gaps/Weaknesses Minutes/Notes to all members of the Core Body Recommendations to the Core Body regarding Mutual Aid Agreements (Service & Equip) Bulk Purchasing Opportunities Financial Transaction Processes & Agreements Challenges requiring higher level emphasis Cost Benefit Analysis of the Recommendations Consolidated Key Recommendations from the WG Meetings Final Legal Review of Recommendations Final Cost Benefit Analysis of Recommendations Advice & feedback to the WG members regarding planned agreements/partnerships New ideas for WG consideration Minutes/Notes to all members of the Core Body& WG Member Leads Highlights of Approved/ Recommended partnership opportunities to include: Anticipated impacts to the stakeholders Cost Benefit results of the partnership Stakeholder Awareness of Partnerships Strengthening Bonds within the CFHR Strategic Communications to internal and external Stakeholders regarding benefits of the Partnerships