1. MODERN 1 st Year Review ENIAC-120003 MODERN Ref. Technical Annex MODERN_PartB Rev2 v2.4 WP1: Giuliana GangemiWP2: André Juge WP3: Wilmar HeuvelmanWP4: Davide Pandini WP5: Loris Vendrame Coordinator: Jan van Gerwen Date: June 22, 2010 (09.30 - 17.00 hrs) Review period: 2009-03-01 : 2010-02-28

2. CONFIDENTIAL 2 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Agenda General information (JvG) –Objectives –Consortium –Resources planned and used –Overview of deliverables and milestones status –Cooperation, dissemination and exploitation –Project management: progress, funding problems and amendments –Other issues, Q&A For WP1 (GG), WP2 (AJ), WP3 (WH), WP4 (DP) and WP5 (LV) –Relationship between workpackages –Progress, highlights and lowlights –Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) –Cooperation –Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation –Other issues, Q&A

3. CONFIDENTIAL 3 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Objectives The objective of the MODERN project is to develop new paradigms in integrated circuit design that will enable the manufacturing of reliable, low cost, low EMI, high-yield complex products using unreliable and variable devices. Specifically, the main goals of the project are:  Advanced, yet accurate, models of process variations for nanometre devices, circuits and complex architectures.  Effective methods for evaluating the impact of process variations on manufacturability, design reliability and circuit performance. oReliability, noise, EMC/EMI. oTiming, power and yield.  Design methods and tools to mitigate or tolerate the effects of process variations on those quantities applicable at the device, circuit and architectural levels.  Validation of the modelling and design methods and tools on a variety of silicon demonstrators. Layout and strain induced variability (Synopsys)

4. CONFIDENTIAL 4 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Consortium The MODERN Consortium features strong competence and expertise in the field of advanced technologies, with a well-balanced participation between Large Industries, SMEs, Research Centres and Universities from all over Europe. 9 Countries28 Partners

5. CONFIDENTIAL 5 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Resources planned and used

6. CONFIDENTIAL 6 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Overview of deliverables and milestones status (1)

7. CONFIDENTIAL 7 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Overview of deliverables and milestones status (2)

8. CONFIDENTIAL 8 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Overview of deliverables and milestones status (3)

9. CONFIDENTIAL 9 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Cooperation, dissemination and exploitation

10. CONFIDENTIAL 10 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Project management: progress, funding problems and amendments

11. CONFIDENTIAL 11 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Other issues Q&A

12. CONFIDENTIAL 12 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP1: Relationship between workpackages

13. CONFIDENTIAL 13 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP1: Progress, highlights and lowlights WP1 has the following specific objectives: –1. Clearly define the issues related to nano-electronic technologies that will be tackled in the MODERN project (e.g.,sensitivity of performances, power, yield, deficiencies of existing design techniques, etc). –2. Set the target technologies for which the above listed problems will be faced. –3. Define the specifications of the prototype tools, methods and flows that will come up as solutions of the previously listed problems. –4. Define the requirements of the integration work needed to embed the new tools into the existing design frameworks provided by the EDA partners within the flows in use at ST, NMX, IFX,THL, AMS and NXP. –5. Define up front all activities of all WPs of MODERN exception made of the management.

14. CONFIDENTIAL 14 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP1: Progress, highlights and lowlights Task T1.1 Problem Definition. Technology Definition Partners: ST-I, AMS, IFXA, NMX, NXP, THL,ST-F Description of the problems to be addressed in the project. Agree on the technologies to be used Task T1.2 Feasibility Study. Definition of Tool Specifications Partners: ST-I, AMS, IFXA, NMX, NXP, THL,ST-F Define a list of tools, methods and design practices to be developed in technical WPs. Feedback from WP2, WP3, and WP4 leaders will be needed in this task. For any of items (tools, methods and design practices) defined above, produce the relative specification. Task T1.3 Specification of Tool demonstration and validation Partners: ST-I, AMS, IFXA, NMX, NXP, THL,ST- F For each tool or method specified produce a verification plan or check list to check the tool not only meets the specification but also solve the problem defined in the problem definition Task 1.4

15. CONFIDENTIAL 15 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP1: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) 1 of 2 D1.1 due M6 delivered at M15 (June the 22 nd 2010) D1.2 due M12 delivered at M15 (June the 22 nd 2010) M1.1 Problem Definition and Tests due M12 delivered M15 (june the 22 nd 2010) CHANGES Description and Motivations –D1.1: “Specification of internal design flows, environments and existing tools interfaces and industrial requirements for upgrades “ –D1.2 “Verification of upgrades achieved by the MODERN deliverables according the specifications”

16. CONFIDENTIAL 16 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP1: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes) 2 of 2 Explanation: The specification activity has gone forward at Task level within each work Package. From Tools, Models,Design techniques specifications, done internally in each Work Package, we moved to the definition of the the Industrial requirements for upgrades. Chage of perspective due to the fact that now the partners requirements are different from what thought at proposal time and the WP1 activities have started trying to make converge all partners necessities and the synthesis requirements of the different WPs in the best format with respect to the day by day activities. The purpose to make the WP1 outcome more useful to the project and the partners has made necessary the decision to delay the deliverable D1.1 to the 15th of June 2010 (and consequently the D1.2 to end of July2010). A new template for D1.1 has been agreed and we require now all Silicon Vendors involved in the project to contribute to it.

17. CONFIDENTIAL 17 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP1: Cooperation WP leader: ST-I Strong dependence on partners: NXP,THL,IFX,AMS,ST-I,SNPS,ST-F Collaboration with partners: NXP,THL,IFX,AMS,ST-I,SNPS,ST-F, collaboration Telephone conferences with: NXP,THL,IFX,AMS,ST-I,SNPS,ST-F according requirements of deliverables. With WP Leaders weekly since the month of May.

18. CONFIDENTIAL 18 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP1: Other issues, Q&A

19. CONFIDENTIAL 19 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP2: Relationship between workpackages

20. CONFIDENTIAL 20 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Task T2.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader) : Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. WP2: Progress, high- and lowlights

21. CONFIDENTIAL 21 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP2: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes)

22. CONFIDENTIAL 22 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP2: Cooperation WP leader: STF2 If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when)

23. CONFIDENTIAL 23 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP2: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation

24. CONFIDENTIAL 24 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP2: Other issues, Q&A

25. CONFIDENTIAL 25 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP3: Relationship between workpackages

26. CONFIDENTIAL 26 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Task T3.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader) : Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. WP3: Progress, high- and lowlights

27. CONFIDENTIAL 27 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP3: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes)

28. CONFIDENTIAL 28 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP3: Cooperation WP leader: NXP If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when)

29. CONFIDENTIAL 29 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP3: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation

30. CONFIDENTIAL 30 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP3: Other issues, Q&A

31. CONFIDENTIAL 31 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP4: Relationship between workpackages

32. CONFIDENTIAL 32 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Task T4.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader) : Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. WP4: Progress, high- and lowlights

33. CONFIDENTIAL 33 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP4: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes)

34. CONFIDENTIAL 34 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP4: Cooperation WP leader: ST-I If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when)

35. CONFIDENTIAL 35 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP4: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation

36. CONFIDENTIAL 36 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP4: Other issues, Q&A

37. CONFIDENTIAL 37 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP5: Relationship between workpackages

38. CONFIDENTIAL 38 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 Task T5.x: Task name Partners (underlined task leader) : Explain in a few words: goal of task, what you did this period, what will be delivered and when. Explain in a few words: what went well, better than expected and what went worse than expected; describe corrective actions. WP5: Progress, high- and lowlights

39. CONFIDENTIAL 39 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP5: Technical status and achievements of deliverables (incl. changes)

40. CONFIDENTIAL 40 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP5: Cooperation WP leader: NMX If strong dependence on partners: list partners, describe dependence Collaboration with partners: list partners, collaboration (division of labor, role, …) Face to face meetings with: list partners (when) Telephone conferences with: list partners (when)

41. CONFIDENTIAL 41 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP5: Dissemination (publications, patents), exploitation

42. CONFIDENTIAL 42 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010 WP5: Other issues, Q&A

43. CONFIDENTIAL 43 MODERN 1st Year Review June 22, 2010