Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMagnus Mason Modified over 9 years ago
1
VELO2 Full Metrology Girish Patel University of Liverpool 16/11/12
2
Each fiducial made of 4 circles, centre of each was measured Measure 5x4 = 20 fiducial points, plus 8 more over surface of silicon. Measure all upstream sensors on all modules, then all downstream. This means that R and Phi sensors are alternately measured VELO2 Full Metrology2G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
3
Take all measured points (almost 1300) and plot the Z value versus measurement number for ALL measurements. Measurements on a single silicon plane should all have same Z, then jump by separation between modules to next silicon plane. All upstream planes followed by all downstream planes explains the overall structure of the plot. However, quite a few anomalies, from single rogue points in a group of 28 to several points, differing by fractions of mm to 30mm! Executive Summary – Data as it stands is not useable VELO2 Full Metrology3G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
4
VELO A-side Points with incorrect z Missing sensor at z=-36 LHCb Z-value Point Measurement Number -767 -717 -667 -617 -467 -37 -734 -684 -634 -584 -277 -434 Sensor pairs on a module are separated by ~2mm. Measurements do not match cf -767 and -734, are co-ordinate systems changed during measurements? VELO2 Full Metrology4G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
5
VELO C-side Points with incorrect z Missing sensor at z=139 VELO2 Full Metrology5G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
6
VELO2 Full Metrology6G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
7
I then ordered the measurement by the mean Z per plane and calculated dZ between adjacent planes. This should be the z-separation between silicon planes on a module (~2mm)alternating with the separation between modules nominally 30, 50, 150 and 160mm. In other words this mixes up the upstream and downstream measurements. This should not matter if the co-ordinate reference frame is unchanged over all measurements. VELO2 Full Metrology7G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
8
VELO2-C Expected separation on a module Missing plane OR Z mismatch Separation between modules ~30, 50, 150, 160 VELO2 Full Metrology8G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
9
VELO2-A Expected separation on a module Missing plane OR Z mismatch Odd separation on a module Separation between modules ~30, where are others VELO2 Full Metrology9G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
10
I calculate a mean x,y,z for each of the five fiducials on each sensor from the four centres I then calculate the mean x,y,z of the five fiducials and arrive at a set of numbers for each sensor. The nominal expected values are given in table above. With the VELO1 metrology the coordinate system of the metrology was very close to the LHCb system with x=y=0 at the centre of the silicon. The mean fiducial position could therefore be compared with the nominal designed average fiducial position and this is shown in the next slide and matched reasonably well. R0.0-20.90 Phi0.6-20.85 Each fiducial made of 4 circles, centre of each was measured R fids symmetric VELO2 Full Metrology10G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
11
VELO1 C-side Expect -20.90 Expect -20.85 Expect 0.6 Expect 0.0 Expect -0.6 VELO2 Full Metrology11G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
12
VELO2 Full Metrology12G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
13
VELO2 Full Metrology13G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
14
VELO2 Full Metrology14G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
15
VELO2 Full Metrology15G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
16
Calculate STDEV of all Z measurements on a silicon plane. Zero if silicon flat AND vertical. A-side mean = 0.063 C-side mean = 0.036 Outliers have points that differ in z by ~0.5mm! VELO1 Mean RMS 0.044 below. Z planarity VELO2 Full Metrology16G. D. Patel, University of Liverpool
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.