Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCandace Hudson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Episodic and High Mass Loss Events In Evolved Stars Roberta M. Humphreys University of Minnesota Intermediate Luminosity Red Transients Space Telescope Science Institute, June 2011
2
The evidence for episodic high mass loss events The Upper HR Diagram
3
In Evolved Massive Stars -- Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs) S Dor variability vs giant Eruptions -- Warm and Cool Hypergiants Humphreys and Davidson 1994
4
So what is an LBV? Distinguished by their photometric and spectroscopic variability In quiescence – hot, luminous star, sp. types late O to mid B, Of/WN7 Some emission lines H, He I, Fe II, P Cyg profiles mass loss rates – typical In “eruption” – rapid rise in apparent visual brightness -- weeks – months apparent shift in sp. type ( late A to early F) or apparent temp -- shift in bolometric correction ~ constant luminosity but … (abs. bol. mag.) star develops, slow, dense, optically thick wind mass loss rate increases ~ 10 x (10 -5 Msun/yr) this optically thick wind stage may last years -- decades R127 (Walborn et al. 2008)
5
S Doradus or LBV Instability StripWolf (1989) Note – in “eruption” – all about same temp ~ 7500 – 8000K Davidson (1987) – opaque wind model (as opacity and mass loss rate increase, temperature approaches a minimum)
6
The Cause of the Instability? Most explanations -- the star is near the Eddington Limit L Edd = 4 cGM sun / Edd = const (L/L sun ) (M/M sun ) -1 Opacity modified limit is temperature dependent 1. opacity – modified Eddington Limit (Davidson, Lamers, Appenzeller) as temp decreases, opacity increases (“bi-stability jump”, Pauldrach & Puls 1990 Lamers et al 1995) 2. Omega limit -- add rotation to the Eddington Limit (Langer) = v rot /v crit > 1, v 2 crit = (1 – ) GM/R 3. Vibration/Pulsation -- mechanism (in the core) no longer considered applicable to evolved stars -- mechanism in the envelope periods of weeks to months 4. Sub-photospheric – violent mode or strange mode instabilities Glatzel et al, Guzik, Stothers & Chin Caused by increase in opacity due to Fe at base of photosphere leading to ionization induced instability
7
Giant Eruptions and the Supernova Impostors Giant Eruption LBVs (Humphreys & Davidson (1994) -- increase their luminosity during the eruption! SN1954j
8
Examples of reflection nebulae associated with LBVs (K. Weis) ejecta and atmospheres are N and He rich Evolved post MS Same linear scale
9
Eta Car’s Second or lesser eruption 1888 -- 1895 Duration ~ 7 yrs Increase ~ 2mag in apparent brightness Spectrum - F supergiant abs lines plus H and Fe II em. First photographic spectra 1892- 93 (Walborn & Liller 1977, Humphreys et al. 2008 Max luminosity 10 6.7 L sun Total energy 10 48.6 ergs Mass lost ~ 0.2 M sun An LBV or S Dor – type “eruption”
10
Supernova Impostors What are they –giant eruptions of evolved massive stars,LBVs, or ?? Obj. Galaxy M v (proj) M Bol max Duration Comment eta Car MW -9.5 -- -10 -14.5 20yrs 2 nd eruption 50 yrs later SN1961v N1058 ~ -12 ? -16.5 ~ 1yr 2 nd eruption 3 yrs later SN1954j N2403 - 7.5 < -11.6 ~ 1 yr V12, max. not observed P Cyg MW - 8 -11 ~ 6 yrs 2 nd eruption 55 yrs later V 1 N2366 -5.6 - 12 > 8 yrs ongoing ? SN1978 N1313 -7.5: < -12 ~ 1 yr max. not observed SN1997bs M66 -8.1 -13.8 30d SN1999bw N3198 ? -12 30d SN2000ch N3432 -10.7: -12.7 ~ 10d second eruption 2009 SN2001ac N3504 ? -13.7 ~ 30d? SN2002kg N2403 -7.4 -11.3 ~ 2 yrs? = V37 SN2008S N6946 -(6.6) -13 < 1 yr optically obscured N300 – OT (2008) -(7.1) -12 to -13 < 1 yr optically obscured U2773 – OT (2009) ~-7.8 -12.8 > 1 yr ongoing ? SN2009ip N7259 ~ -10 -14.5 > 1 yr ongoing? SN2010da N300 ( -5.5) -10.4 optically obscured SN2010dn N3184 -12.9 optically obscured ? N3437 –OT (2011) -13.6
11
The Warm and Cool Hypergiants IRC+10420
12
Warm Hypergiants, post RSG evolution, the “Yellow” void, and a dynamical instability
13
The Intermediate-Luminosity Red Transients A small group of stars, a range of initial masses?, different origins for their instability/outbursts? What they have in common – cool/red, evolved V838 Mon V4332 Sgr V1309 Sco M31 Red Var M85 2006 red transient SN 2008s (N6946) -- optically obscured progenitor N300 2008 OT -- optically obscured progenitor SN 2010da (N300) -- optically obscured progenitor SN 2010dn (N3194) -- optically obscured progenitor? Binary merger (V1309 Sco) Photospheric instability? Supernova or failed supernova ? *
14
NGC 300 2008 OT SN2008s SN2010da Optically obscured, “cool” transients Prieto 2008Prieto et al 2008Khan et al., Berger et al. 2010 T= 350K BB L = 5.5 x 10 4 L sun, Mbol = -7.1 mag at maximum Mv = -12.1 or -12.9 mag L = 1.1 x 10 7 L sun T= 440K BB L = 3.5 x 10 4 L sun Mbol = -6.8 mag at maximum Mv = -13.6 mag L = 3 x 10 7 L sun T= 890 K BB L = 1.3 x 10 4 L sun Mbol = -5.5 mag at maximum Mv = -10.4 mag L = 1.1 x 10 6 L sun In “eruption” increased 100 – 1000 times
15
Spectra F-type supergiant absorption spectra plus strong H, Ca II and [CaII] emission– resemble IRC+10420 Bond et al. 2009 Berger et al. 2009
16
A post RSG star (supergiant OH/IR star), post AGB(OH/IR or C star), on a blue-loop Electron-capture SN (Thompson et al. 2009) Failed SN ? Binary interactions? SN2010da (SGXB, Binder et al. 2011) Photospheric instability (super-Edd wind (Smith et al.2009, Bond et al. 2009) Heger: “ the stars (on a blue loop) are not happy”
17
Outstanding Theoretical Problems in Massive Star Research A future meeting -- Minnesota Instiute for Astrophysics and Fine Theoretical Physics Institute University of Minnesota October 2012 IMPOSTOR !
18
3D Morphology and History of Asymmetric Mass Loss Events and Origin of Discrete Ejecta Arcs and Knots are spatially and kinematically distinct; ejected in different directions at different times; not aligned with any axis of symmetry. They represent localized, relatively massive (few x 10 -3 M sun ) ejections Large-scale convective activity Magnetic Fields From polarization of OH, H 2 O, SiO masers (Vlemmings et al. 2002, 2005)
19
V37 in N2403, Tammann & Sandage 1968 SN 2009ip ATEL 2897, Oct 1, 2010
20
Variable A in M33 – a warm or cool hypergiant ~ 45 years in eruption! Warm Hypergiants, post RSG evolution, the “Yellow” void, and a dynamical instability
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.