Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGwen Dixon Modified over 9 years ago
1
Hecht WCGIC 2007 An Interim Analysis of Efficacy And Safety From A Randomized Controlled Trial of Panitumumab With Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab (Bev) for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) J. Randolph Hecht, 1 Tarek Chidiac, 2 Edith Mitchell, 3 Philip Stella, 4 Allen Cohn, 5 David McCollum, 6 Mansoor Saleh, 7 John Marshall, 8 Seta Shahin, 9 Robert Deeter 9 1 UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; 2 Mid Ohio Oncology/Hematology, Inc, Columbus, OH; 3 Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; 4 St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI; 5 Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; 6 Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; 7 Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta, GA; 8 Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; 9 Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
2
Hecht WCGIC 2007 2 Introduction Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) and is approved in the US for the treatment of refractory mCRC The US standard of care for first-line treatment of mCRC is the combination of bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin- or irinotecan- based chemotherapy (Ox-CT or Iri-CT) Preclinical and preliminary clinical studies have suggested that combining EGFr, VEGF inhibitors, and chemotherapy may improve efficacy 1,2 The PACCE study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and chemotherapy +/- panitumumab for first-line treatment of mCRC 1 Shaheen et al. Brit J Cancer 2001;85:584-589 2 Saltz LB et al. ASCO 2005. Abstract #3508 (BOND2)
3
Hecht WCGIC 2007 3 Study Schema PACCE: Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Phase 3b Trial Stratification Factors: ECOG score, prior adjuvant tx, disease site, Ox doses/Iri regimen, number of metastatic organs Tumor assessments: Q12W until disease progression or intolerability Panitumumab 6 mg/kg Q2W Ox-CT Bevacizumab Ox-based CT (eg, FOLFOX) N = 800 Inv choice Iri-basedCT (eg, FOLFIRI) N = 200 Inv choice Ox-CT Bevacizumab Panitumumab 6 mg/kg Q2W Iri-CTBevacizumab Iri-CTBevacizumab RANDOMIZERANDOMIZE 1:1 SCREENINGSCREENING
4
Hecht WCGIC 2007 4 Key Eligibility Criteria Age 18 years old Measurable mCRC per modified RECIST criteria ECOG status 0 or 1 Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function No prior chemotherapy or biologic therapy for mCRC No adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months No major surgery within 28 days of randomization or elective and/or planned major surgical procedures during the trial No clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 1 year prior to randomization No EGFr testing required
5
Hecht WCGIC 2007 5 Primary endpoint:* –Progression-free survival (PFS) by central review in the Ox-CT cohort Secondary endpoints: –Objective response rate by central review –Time to treatment failure (TTF) –Overall survival (OS) –Safety profile Design Characteristics –To detect a 30% improvement in median PFS in the panitumumab plus bev/Ox-CT vs the bev/Ox-CT 80% power and = 0.05 (2-sided) for 462 PFS events (disease progression or death) Planned interim analysis at ~231 PFS events Study Endpoints and Design Characteristics *Powered for oxaliplatin cohort only; descriptive for irinotecan cohort
6
Hecht WCGIC 2007 6 Independent DMC Analyses 25 Pts Safety 75 Pts 150 Pts SafetySafety RR Unplanned Safety Efficacy Safety RR Safety Efficacy 500 Pts 800 Pts ~231 PFS events ~231 OS Q3 07 DMC recommended continuation without protocol modification Mar 2005 Panitumumab dosing was discontinued DMC recommended changes to informed consent 1 st pt randomized
7
Hecht WCGIC 2007 7 Baseline Demographics and Characteristics pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) bev/Ox-CT (N=405) pmab+ bev/Iri-CT (N=68) bev/Iri-CT (N=67) Male, %57584963 Race, % White Black Hispanic 83 8 6 81 10 6 75 18 3 70 19 10 Age, median, years Range 61 28 - 88 62 27 - 89 60.5 37 - 84 57 23 - 80 Age 65, % 39434128 Baseline ECOG, % 0 1 62 38 59 41 60 40 63 37 Prior Adjuvant Therapy, %19 4037 Metastatic organs, % 1 >1 49 51 49 51 40 60 48 52
8
Hecht WCGIC 2007 8 PACCE INTERIM ANALYSIS: SAFETY
9
Hecht WCGIC 2007 9 Summary of Adverse Events (Ox-CT Cohort) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=401) bev/Ox-CT (N=392) Any event, %100 Grade 35352 Grade 42818 Grade 5* 43 Any serious (SAE), %5637 Ended first-line treatment due to AE, % 1920 Ended panitumumab treatment due to AE, % 26n/a Panitumumab treatment- related SAE, % 19n/a Safety set included all patients who were dosed. Graded per NCI CTCAE v3.0 *Not including disease progression (ie, neoplasms) n/a= not applicable
10
Hecht WCGIC 2007 10 Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events of Interest (Ox-CT Cohort) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=401), % bev/Ox-CT (N=392), % Gr 3Gr 4Gr 3Gr 4 Skin toxicity33<110 Diarrhea212121 Dehydration14241 Hypokalemia8231 Hypomagnesemia3100 Neutropenia1210177 Neuropathy9<110<1 Nausea1004<1 Infections a 16272 Deep venous thrombosis6070 Pulmonary embolism b 0604 MedDRA v9.0 preferred terms; Graded per NCI CTCAE v3.0 a Grade 5 infections occurred in 2 (1%) pmab + bev/Ox-CT pts and 3 (1%) bev/Ox-CT pts b Grade 5 pulmonary embolism occurred in 2 (1%) pmab + bev/Ox-CT pts
11
Hecht WCGIC 2007 11 Deaths (Ox-CT Cohort) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT N=401 n (%) bev/Ox-CT N=392 n (%) Deaths on study83 (20)58 (15) All cause deaths within 60 days of first dose 10 (2)6 (2) All cause deaths within 30 days of last dose of 1 st line tx 26 (6)13 (3) Safety set included all patients who were dosed
12
Hecht WCGIC 2007 12 PACCE INTERIM ANALYSIS: EFFICACY
13
Hecht WCGIC 2007 13 Objective Response Rate By Cohort (Central Review) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) % bev/Ox-CT (N=405) % pmab+ bev/Iri-CT (N=68) % bev/Iri-CT (N=67) % Best ORR39413831 Complete response 0<100 Partial response39403831 Stable disease31332637 Progressive disease6494 Not done/Unevaluable*24222627 ITT set *Included missing and unreadable scans
14
Hecht WCGIC 2007 14 Partial Response 39% Stable Disease 31% Progressive Disease 6% Pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=305) Max % Change in Sum of Longest Diameters bev/Ox-CT (N=310) Max % Change in Sum of Longest Diameters Maximum % Change in SLD of Target Lesions (Ox-CT Cohort, Central Review) Complete/Partial Response 41% Stable Disease 33% Progressive Disease 4%
15
Hecht WCGIC 2007 15 Objective Response Rate By Cohort (Investigator Review) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) % bev/Ox-CT (N=405) % pmab+ bev/Iri-CT (N=68) % bev/Iri-CT (N=67) % Best ORR49485440 Complete response 4574 Partial response44424736 Stable disease29342537 Progressive disease75410 Not done/Unevaluable*15131612 ITT set *Included missing and unreadable scans
16
Hecht WCGIC 2007 16 Interim Rates of Metastases Intervention (Ox-CT Cohort, Oct 2006 Data Cutoff) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) bev/Ox-CT (N=405) Resection or radiofrequency ablation of metastases (ie, liver, lung, other) 27 (7%)12 (3%) ITT set *Included missing and unreadable scans
17
Hecht WCGIC 2007 17 Interim PFS – Ox-CT Cohort (Central Review, Oct 2006 Data Cutoff) # PFS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 147 (36)8.8 (8.3-9.5) 110 (27)10.5 (9.4-12.0) HR=1.44 (95% CI: 1.13-1.85) p =0.004 Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT Proportion Progression-Free 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ITT set; for this planned interim analysis, the nominal alpha as specified by the Lan-DeMets alpha spending function and the O’Brien-Fleming stopping boundaries was 0.0053
18
Hecht WCGIC 2007 18 Limited Update of PFS – Ox-CT Cohort (Central Review, Apr 2007 Data Cutoff) # PFS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 206 (50)9.0 (8.5-10.4) 172 (42)10.5 (9.7-11.6) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT HR= 1.29 (95% CI: 1.05-1.58) Proportion Progression-Free 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ITT set
19
Hecht WCGIC 2007 19 Unplanned Interim Overall Survival (Ox-CT Cohort) # OS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 127 (31)18.6 (16.4- 20.6) 95 (23)NE Proportion Alive HR= 1.44 (95% CI: 1.10-1.88) *Interpretation of statistical significance is limited by the lack of a prespecified significance boundary Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT HR= 1.56 (95% CI: 1.11-2.17) Oct 2006 Data Cutoff*Apr 2007 Data Cutoff # OS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 83 (20)18.4 (13.8-NE) 58 (14)NE Proportion Alive Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT NE = not estimable; ITT set
20
Hecht WCGIC 2007 20 PACCE INTERIM ANALYSIS: ADDITIONAL ANALYSES (Ox-CT Cohort )
21
Hecht WCGIC 2007 21 No PD PD Alive Died Exposure-Adjusted Adverse Event Incidence (Events per month) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bev/Ox-CT Pmab + Bev/Ox-CT 4.8 5.8 5.0 6.9 3.9 3.8 Number of events per month
22
Hecht WCGIC 2007 22 Overall Survival By Age ( 80 yr vs >80) (Exploratory Analysis) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, <80 yrs n=389Bev/Ox-CT, <80 yrs n=395 Months Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, >80 yrs n=18Bev/Ox-CT, >80 yrs, n=10 Proportion Surviving
23
Hecht WCGIC 2007 23 Overall Survival By Comorbidities (0 vs 1+) (Exploratory Analysis) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, Comobidity 0 n=119Bev/Ox-CT, Comobidity 0 n=104 Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, Comorbidity 1+ n=288Bev/Ox-CT, Comorbidity 1+ n=301 Proportion Surviving Months
24
Hecht WCGIC 2007 24 Overall Survival of ECOG (0 vs 1) (Exploratory Analysis) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 0 n=254Bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 0 n=237 Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 1 n=153Bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 1 n=168 Months Proportion Surviving
25
Hecht WCGIC 2007 25 Treatment Exposure (Ox-CT Cohort) Dose Delays % Pts Dose Reductions % Pts Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) % pmab+ bev/Ox n=401 bev/Ox n=392 pmab+ bev/Ox n=401 bev/Ox n=392 pmab+ bev/Ox n=401 bev/Ox n=392 Panitumumab62n/a31n/a870 Bevacizumab57493292 Oxaliplatin554626258488 5-FU52 a 45 a 23 a 16 a 82 b 87 b % Pts Inf 5-FU/ Ox/Bev ≥ 85% n/a 3644 a Bolus 5-FU b Infusional 5-FU n/a=not applicable
26
Hecht WCGIC 2007 26 Reasons for First-Line Treatment Discontinuation (Ox-CT Cohort) Patients discontinued first-line tx, n/ N total pmab + bev/Ox-CT (300/407) bev/Ox-CT (293/405) Progressive events, n (%)108 (36)79 (27) Disease progression91 (30)68 (23) Deaths17 (6)11 (4) Non-progressive events, n (%)192 (64)214 (73) Adverse events69 (23)76 (26) Protocol violation9 (3)5 (2) Refused treatment47 (16)55 (19) Other67 (22)78 (27)
27
Hecht WCGIC 2007 27 Time to Treatment Failure (Ox-CT Cohort) HR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.87-1.21) Survival Distribution Function Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT Patients at risk: Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT
28
Hecht WCGIC 2007 28 SUMMARY This phase 3b open-label, US community-based study investigated the potential benefit of adding an anti-EGFr antibody (panitumumab) to an anti-VEGF-A antibody (bevacizumab) and chemotherapy for first-line mCRC A planned interim analysis on the Ox cohort demonstrated an unfavorable risk:benefit profile for panitumumab+ bev/Ox-CT based on reduced PFS time and additional toxicity These efficacy data suggest that there is a lack of biological synergy between panitumumab and bevacizumab in combination with Ox-CT Additional toxicity was observed in the panitumumab + bev/Ox-CT arm –Dual pathway inhibition may have potentiated toxicity Lower dose intensity was observed in the panitumumab + bev/Ox- CT arm
29
Hecht WCGIC 2007 29 SUMMARY (cont.) In an exploratory, post-hoc analysis, specific populations, particularly patients who were elderly, had poor performance status, or had comorbidities > 1, had worse outcomes Most patients withdrew due to non-progressive events (64% on panitumumab + bev/Ox-CT arm, 73% on bev/Ox-CT arm) Further data collection and analyses are ongoing, including subset analyses based on biomarkers Phase 3 registrational studies are currently ongoing to investigate panitumumab with chemotherapy alone in first- and second-line mCRC –Independent data monitoring committees for these studies have recommended continuation without protocol modification
30
Hecht WCGIC 2007 30 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Patients who participated in this study and their families All investigators, co-investigators, and study staffs at 194 sites across the US The Amgen study team
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.