Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Network Clustering Experimental network mapping Graph theory and terminology Scale-free architecture Integrating with gene essentiality Robustness Lecturer:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Network Clustering Experimental network mapping Graph theory and terminology Scale-free architecture Integrating with gene essentiality Robustness Lecturer:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Network Clustering Experimental network mapping Graph theory and terminology Scale-free architecture Integrating with gene essentiality Robustness Lecturer: Trey Ideker

2 2 Measurements of molecular interactions Protein-protein interactions Yeast-two-hybrid Kinase-substrate assays Co-immunoprecipitation w/ mass spec Protein-DNA interactions ChIP-on-chip and ChIP-seq Genetic interactions Systematic Genetic Analysis

3 3 Yeast two-hybrid method Fields and Song

4 4 Kinase-target interactions Mike Snyder and colleagues

5 5 Protein interactions by protein immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry Gavin / Cellzome TEV = Tobacco Etch Virus proteolytic site CBP = Calmodulin binding peptide Protein A = IgG binding from Staphylococcus

6 ChIP measurement of protein→DNA interactions From Figure 1 of Simon et al. Cell 2001

7 Genetic interactions: synthetic lethals and suppressors Genetic Interactions: Widespread method used by geneticists to discover pathways in yeast, fly, and worm Implications for drug targeting and drug development for human disease Thousands are now reported in literature and systematic studies As with other types, the number of known genetic interactions is exponentially increasing… Adapted from Tong et al., Science 2001

8 8 Most recorded genetic interactions are synthetic lethal relationships Adapted from Hartman, Garvik, and Hartwell, Science 2001 ABAΔBΔBΔAΔABΔAΔAΔBΔB

9   A B Parallel Effects (Redundant or Additive) Sequential Effects (Additive) Single A or B mutations typically abolish their biochemical activities Single A or B mutations typically reduce their biochemical activities Interpretation of genetic interactions (Guarente T.I.G. 1990)   AB GOAL: Identify downstream physical pathways

10 Yeast protein-protein interaction network What are its network properties?

11 Graphs Graph G=(V,E) is a set of vertices V and edges E A subgraph G’ of G is induced by some V’  V and E’  E Graph properties: –Node degree –Directed vs. undirected –Loops –Paths –Cyclic vs. acyclic –Simple vs. multigraph –Complete –Connected –Bipartite

12 Paths A path is a sequence {x 1, x 2,…, x n } such that (x 1,x 2 ), (x 2,x 3 ), …, (x n-1,x n ) are edges of the graph.sequence edgesgraph A closed path x n =x 1 on a graph is called a graph cycle or circuit. graph cycle

13 Network measures Degree k i The number of edges involving node i Degree distribution P(k) The probability (frequency) of nodes of degree k Mean path length The avg. shortest path between all node pairs Network Diameter “The longest shortest path” How do the above definitions differ between undirected and directed networks?

14 WHAT DOES SCALE FREE REALLY MEAN, ANYWAY? P(k) is probability of each degree k For scale free: P(k) ~ k  What happens for small vs. large  ?

15 Random vs Preferential Attachment Erdos-Renyi Start with N nodes and connect each pair with equal probability p Scale-free Add nodes incrementally. New nodes connect to each existing node I with probability proportional to its degree: Scale-free networks have small avg. path lengths ~ log (log N)– this is called the ‘small world’ effect

16 Clustering coefficient The combination “k choose 2” # edges between node I’s neighbors # of neighbors of I The density of the network surrounding node I, characterized as the number of triangles through I. Related to network modularity C(k) = avg. clustering coefficient for nodes of degree k

17 Directionality and Degree What is the clustering coefficient of A in either case?

18 Integrating networks with functional gene information: Gene replacement for yeast & other model species Using HR-based gene replacement, genes can be replaced with drug resistance cassette, tagged with GFP, epitope tagged, etc.

19 Systematic phenotyping yfg1 Δ yfg2 Δ yfg3 Δ CTAACTCTCGCGCATCATAAT Barcode (UPTAG): Deletion Strain: Growth 6hrs in minimal media (how many doublings?) Rich media … Harvest and label genomic DNA

20 Systematic phenotyping with a barcode array Ron Davis and friends… These oligo barcodes are also spotted on a DNA microarray Growth time in minimal media: –Red: 0 hours –Green: 6 hours

21

22 The amazing result from that paper % Essential P(k) kk

23 Robustness Complex systems, from the cell to the Internet, can be amazingly resilient to component failure Network topology plays an important role in this robustness Even if ~80% of nodes fail, the remaining ~20% still maintain network connectivity This also leads to attack vulnerability if hubs are selectively targeted In yeast, only ~20% of proteins are lethal when deleted, and are 5 times more likely to have degree k>15 than k<5.

24 Network Motifs (Milo, Alon et al.) Motifs are “patterns of interconnections occurring in complex networks.” That is, connected subgraphs of a particular isomorphic topology The approach queries the network for small motifs (e.g., of < 5 nodes) that occur much more frequently than would be expected in random networks Significant motifs have been found in a variety of biological networks and, for instance, correspond to feed-forward and feed-back loops that are well known in circuit design and other engineering fields. Pioneered by Uri Alon and colleagues

25 Motif searches in 3 different contexts

26 All 3-node directed subgraphs What is the frequency of each in the network?

27 Outline of the Approach Search network to identify all possible n-node connected subgraphs (here n=3 or 4) Get # occurrences of each subgraph type The significance for each type is determined using permutation testing, in which the above process is repeated for many randomized networks (preserving node degrees– why?) Use random distributions to compute a p-value for each subgraph type. The “network motifs” are subgraphs with p < 0.001

28 Schematic view of network motif detection Networks are randomized preserving node degree

29 Concentration of feedforward motif: Mean+/-SD of 400 subnetworks (Num. appearances of motif divided by all 3 node connected subgraphs)

30 Transcriptional network results

31 Neural networks

32 Food webs

33 World Wide Web

34 Electronic circuits

35 Interesting questions Which networks have motifs in common? Which networks have completely distinct motifs versus the others? Does this tell us anything about the design constraints on each network? E.g., the feedforward loop may function to activate output only if the input signal is persistent (i.e., reject noisy or transient signals) and to allow rapid deactivation when the input turns off E.g., food webs evolve to allow flow of energy from top to bottom (?!**!???), whereas transcriptional networks evolve to process information


Download ppt "Network Clustering Experimental network mapping Graph theory and terminology Scale-free architecture Integrating with gene essentiality Robustness Lecturer:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google