Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

201 529 5151 www.hydroqual.com SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "201 529 5151 www.hydroqual.com SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006."— Presentation transcript:

1 201 529 5151 www.hydroqual.com SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006

2 2 2 SJR Models – Study Area Downstream  DSM2-delta  ECOMSED/RCA  Tidal portion from Vernalis to Jersey Island Upstream  DSM2-sjr  Free-flowing portion from Stevinson to Vernalis Source: Kratzer, et al. (2004) USGS WRI-03-4127

3 3 3 Model Grid R2 R5 TB RSAN058 R4 R3 R1

4 4 4 Modeling Effort Models calibrated/validated from 2000- 2001 on a continuous basis Hydrodynamic model includes tidal transport and calculation of temperature Water quality model uses tidal transport and includes the following parameters:  EC, BOD, DO, eutrophication (nutrients & phytoplankton), TSS

5 5 5 Model Calibration Period Flows USGS Vernalis Gage Model Period Annual Average Summer Average (J-S) 2001 1923-2002

6 6 6

7 7 7

8 8 8 DWSC Hydrodynamic Modeling Hydrodynamic model calibration:  Model output compared to observed stage, flow & temperature  Compares well with data and DSM2 output  Reproduces daily temperature stratification  Further work may be needed in the Turning Basin & near Old River/Mossdale

9 9 9 Temperature Calibration

10 10 Temperature Calibration 2002 Data near R5 2001 Model near R5

11 11 Flow Calibration Increased Old River flow between Jun-Aug by 530 cfs

12 12 DWSC Water Quality Modeling Water quality model calibration:  Model output compared to observed DO, BOD, nutrients, chl-a, TSS & EC  Focus on reproducing low DO events, stratification & algal dynamics  Includes a sediment flux submodel  Post-processor to view output (HIMS) u Including web-based viewer

13 13 Light Extinction (Lehman, 2005) Ideally – light data with depth Determine Ke using:  I = I o e -KeH Actuality – secchi depth data Determine Ke using:  Ke = 1.8/secchi

14 14 Light Extinction Relationship Used coupled secchi, TSS & chla data to develop relationship (Di Toro, 1978)  Ke = 0.052NVSS + 0.174VSS + 0.031Chla  VSS = 0.2TSS (based on Vernalis data)  Ke = 0.0764TSS + 0.031Chla Model calculates Ke as a function of modeled TSS and Chla

15 15 Spatial Variation Secchi depth increases in DWC (lower chla & TSS) Decreased Ke in DWSC vs upstream SJR

16 16 Algal Stoichiometry Data from Vernalis  Limited POC data in DWSC Redfield ratios  C/N = 5.7 (Data – 3.1)  C/P = 41 (Data - 32) C/Chl Range = 20-100  Data – 37, Lehman – 40 Used Redfield & C/Chl=40

17 17 Other Model Inputs Solar radiation – CIMIS Lodi West  100-700 ly/d, variations due to weather events Boundary Conditions:  Upstream based on Vernalis  Downstream based on Jersey & Potato Pt  Internal sloughs based on river data Atmospheric Reaeration  Based on wind speed formula (Banks, 1975 & Banks & Herrera, 1977)

18 18 Hourly Wind Speed and KL at R&R Island Source: DWR 2000 2001

19 19 Model Settling/Deposition Water column settling – 2.5 m/d Deposition to sediment – variable  DWSC: 0.25-0.5 m/d (higher in TB)  SJR: 0-0.05 m/d w/ adjustments to assist in TSS & chla calibration Settling rates set based on calibration

20 20 Model Parameters

21 21 Stockton RWCF Effluent

22 22 DWSC SOD Data & Model Output (Litton, 2003)

23 23 DO & Chla Calibration Vernalis (BC) Mossdale

24 24 R1 R2

25 25 R3 R4

26 26 R5 R6

27 27 R7 R8

28 28 Spatial DO & Chla Transects (June-October Average) 2000 2001

29 29 Spatial Nutrient Transects 2000 2001

30 30 DO Deficit Components (R5) Source Sink Ka – Source SOD - Sink

31 31 Summary DWSC WQ Model calibration completed & final report issued (Task 4 – May 2006) Provides finer temporal & vertical resolution than previous modeling studies  Stratification, diurnal variation, DO components Can be used to assess DO aeration device impacts (e.g., location, spreading, benefit) Links upstream & downstream water quality for assessing management alternatives

32 32 Recommendations Further testing of models to more recent DWSC data (hydro & WQ)  Different flow regimes, DO levels, etc. More detailed data/modeling of the Mossdale/Old River area of the SJR  Algal growth between Vernalis & Mossdale More information on carbon dynamics  POC/DOC data, internal loads, DO effects

33 33 Recommendations Investigate algal dynamics (2 species)  Studies have shown different algal species  Include more than 1 species in model with different algal growth dynamics  May help Vernalis-Mossdale algal growth Use models in adaptive management approach  Use models (as currently calibrated) to investigate potential controls while still collecting data & completing modeling to improve the effective use of the DWSC model as a management tool

34 34 Questions & Answers Contact info: Andy Thuman Laurie De Rosa HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ (201) 529-5151 x7184 athuman@hydroqual.com lderosa@hydroqual.com

35 35 Light Extinction Comparison


Download ppt "201 529 5151 www.hydroqual.com SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google