1. Working Together for Solutions AGP – Agricultural Conference 21-23 June 2009 Harkány How to react on challenges facing the pork industry today? The advantages of HiPro soymeal for pork feeding Zsarnóczay Sándor, Pig-DATA Kft. – Danisco Animal Nutrition

2. The HiPro soymeal’s advantages in practice

3. Nutrients Processing (extraction) Price Production Results The base for HiPro soymeal’s purchasing

4. Why the HiPro soymeal? High Extraction Standard High raw protein (min. 47,5 %) and lysine (min. 2,98 %) rate Low fibre content (max. 3,3 %) High energy rate - (A)ME poultry:2525 kcal/kg or 10.55 MJ/kg - ME pork:3385 kcal/kg or 14.15 MJ/kg Optimized production technology - Ureas activity 0.01-0.2 pH growth - Protein solvability in 0,2 % KOH solution: 73–87 % - PDI

5. HiProII. Diff. Raw Protein, %47,5 - 4944-464 Raw Fat, % min.0.50.50 Raw Fibre, % max.3,3-3,57,03,5 Moisture Content, % max.12,012,00 Regulations for Soymeal from the USA’s National Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA)

6. Raw Protein quantity in % in the 26357 HiPro sample (analytic trial) Average: 47,49 %, 1 SD 0,81

7. Comparison of Amino acid content of some Oilseed meals 44% soymeal HiPro soymeal Cottonseed meal Canola Arginin3.43.84.62.34.623.5 Lysine2.93.21.72.31.81.7 Methionine0.650.750.520.70.421.5 Cystin0.670.740.640.470.730.7 Tryptophan0.60.70.50.40.5 Hystidin1.11.31.1 111 Leucine3.43.82.42.63.72.6 Isoleucine2.52.61.31.51.82.1 Phenylalanine2.22.72.21.522.2 Threonine1.721.31.71.21.5 Valin2.42.71.9 2.3 Sunflower meal Peanut meal Rapeseed meal

8. inefficient heat treatment excessive heat treatment optimal temperature interval Protein and Amino acid Digestibility Effect of Heat Treatment on Protein and Amino acid Digestibility and on Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances

9. inefficient heat treatment excessive heat treatment optimal temperature interval Protein and Amino acid Digestibility Quality Assurance: Effect of Heat Treatment on Protein and Amino acid Digestibility and on Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances Time: 25 - - - 20 ------------------ 5 2 -------- 1 Ureáz:.3.02 - - - - - 0 0,2 % KOH: 70 85 - - 90 PDI: - - - 30 15 - -

10. The right extraction’s nutrition-preservative role Inefficient -Anti-nutritive factors Heat Treatment tripsyn inhibitors lectins lipoxygen (Ureáz test) Excessive-Proteins denature Heat Treatment Lysine ruins (KOH test for protein solvability)

11. Summary of Recommended Soymeal Quality Control Procedures Test Time Need (min) Expertise neededAccuracyGood figure Ureaz index20lowaverage0,02 – 0,30 0,2 % KOH solvability 20 low/ average 70-85% (70%) PDI10 low/ average good15-30% (< 45%) TIA (Trypsin Inhibitor Activity) > 24 hourshighgood< 5 mg/g Colouring (cresol red) <10lowweak 5,0–6,5 mg/g

12. Summary: 1.There is a wide variety of soya products available for the forage industry. 2.The characters of the soya are largely dependent on the country of origin and the used heat treatment technology. 3.The protein and amino acid digestibility and the concentration of anti-nutritive substances can be optimized with the right heat treatment. 4.With help of quality control procedures the heat treatment’s rate and the variability of nutritive substances can be established. 5.It is practical to use one of the presented tests in the factory, and the achieved results should be used for the recipe's composition. The base for the GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) could be developed with the help of these tests, too.

13. Better quality Protein Carriers - even though their price per ton is higher- reward the ambitious and good thinking professional who does not only want to “produce” a broiler but also a profit. - Dr. Németh Boldizsár -

14. Main Ingredients Parameters of HiPro and II. class soymeal (%) Ingredient ParametersII. Class soymealHiPro soymeal Dry Component88 ME poultry MJ/kg9,8210,55 ME pork MJ/kg13,4614,15 Raw Protein44-4647,5 min. Raw Fibre5,603,30 max. Lysine2,802,98 min. Methionine0,620,67 Threonine1,721,87 Tryptophan0,74 Calcium0,290,27 Whole Phosphor0,27 Potassium2,001,98

15. Soymeal Energy levels HiProII. classDifference Poultry (A)ME MJ/kg 10,559,820,73 Pork ME MJ/kg 14,1513,460,69

16. How to count?

17. Counting with real figures on base of ideal digestibility Figures of digestible lysine, threonine, methionine and tryptophan.

18. Why is it more practical to calculate on base of digestibility? Amino acids of different ingredients are utilized differently. E.g. lysine of soymeal is 85-91% digestible… (meat powder only 70-75%!) The “traditional” formula does not take this into account. The traditionally formed forage’s expected efficiency is not good enough… The comparison of ingredients on base of digestibility is much more objective. Production and expenses of forage formed this way are more efficient…

19. Real ideal digestibility of main amino-acids of HiPro, II.class soymeal, barley, wheat and corn (%)– monogastric livestock % Raw protein LysineMethionineThreonineTryptophan HiPro89,1091,5091,9587,7091,50 II. class86,5088,9090,6085,2587,00 Barley79,7076,9584,7577,8079,65 Wheat88,4075,9583,9576,3081,20 Corn 86,2078,8590,6582,3582,00

20. Pork and Broiler requirements – using the previous data, and recommended by the sources shown below: On base of ideal digestibility NRC, Degussa, INRA, AFZ, ITCF, ADISSEO, Ajinomoto, AmiPig és SwinePro

21. MIN. - MAX. ME Kcal/(MJ) /kg Raw Fibre % Raw Protein % Digestible Lysine % Digestible Methionine % Digestible Threonin % Digestible Tryptophan % Broiler starter 3150 (13,17) Max. 3,0 Min. 21,5 Min. 1,10 Min. 0,45 Min. 0,69 Min. 0,17 Broiler Grower 3200 (13,38) Max. 3,5 Min. 20,0 Min. 0,98 Min. 0,37 Min. 0,64 Min. 0,16 Broiler Finisher 3250 (13,59) Max. 3,8 Min. 18,0 Min. 0,86 Min. 0,35 Min. 0,57 Min. 0,15 Pork starter I. Under 10 kg 3400 (14,21) Max. 3,0 Min. 23,5 Min. 1,30 Min. 0,50 Min. 0,75 Min. 0,28 Pork starter II. 10-19 kg 3350 (14,00) Max. 3,3 Min. 22,0 Min. 1,20 Min. 0,45 Min. 0,70 Min. 0,25 Pork starter III. 20-30 kg 3300 (13,80) Max. 3,6 Min. 20,5 Min. 1,10 Min. 0,40 Min. 0,67 Min. 0,21 88% solid content,on base of feeding with ready-made forage (DEGUSSA+AVENTIS, 2001)

22. What can we establish? The HiPro soymeal is more efficient ingredient (even though it is more expensive), compared to the II. class soymeal. By using the HiPro soymeal the recipe’s fibre content is lower, therefore it is more likely that better digestibility of the forage could be guaranteed; and the raw protein does not limit either(!). That means, that for production of 1 kg livestock forage expenses could be lower !

23. What lesson to draw? In each case in the recipes the HiPro replaced the II. class soymeal, if we did not limit the raw protein. The HiPro had a higher proportion in recipes even in the case of raw protein limitation. In any case the HiPro is a more profitable digestible amino-acid source than the II. class soymeal.

24. Summary: Today every single penny(!) is important for breeders! It was proved that –in most of the cases – usage of a more expensive ingredients could be more profitable than similar but cheaper ingredients! The HiPro soymeal is not only more profitable, but it is a more digestible forage for animals, too!

25. Thank You for Your Attention!